Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel-First Interim Report

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel-First Interim Report PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 83

Get Book Here

Book Description
Predicting the performance of a repository at Yucca Mountain is a technically challenging task. As is noted in Section II, the analysis involves the modeling of complex hydrologic, thermal, chemical, and mechanical interactions over times spanning tens to hundreds of thousands of years. Many of the technical questions that are necessarily addressed in this analysis, for example, the distribution of the time for corrosion to breach the waste canisters, are at the forefront of the capabilities of present day science. With these complexities in mind, the TSPA Peer Review Panel has evaluated work that has been done and that is in progress. This first interim report reflects the Panel's initial review, subject to the following significant limitations: The Total System Performance Assessment (TSPA) supporting the Viability Assessment (VA) has not yet been written and, thus, the Panel is reviewing a work in progress. The Panel has available to it previous TSPA reports and various technical reports prepared in support of TSPA. The Panel also has been given briefings on the work being done for the TSPA-VA and has sent Panel members to abstraction meetings conducted by the TSPA-VA team to assign priorities to key technical issues and provide simplified versions of analyses suitable for an integrated analysis of the site as a whole. Members of the Panel have also attended other project workshops. The design of the repository is evolving. A number of aspects of the design have changed since the Panel's first meeting or are under review. Examples include the use of Alloy 625 instead of Alloy 825 as the inner corrosion resistant material of the waste canisters, the potential use of a gravel or sand backfill in the drifts, and consideration of alternative configurations for spent fuel containing highly enriched uranium. The Panel is still in an orientation phase. This is a large and technically diverse project with a long history. In the few months since the Panel's first meeting, members have not had sufficient time to review all relevant documents or to learn of all the work that is being done to support the TSPA-VA.

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel-First Interim Report

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel-First Interim Report PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 83

Get Book Here

Book Description
Predicting the performance of a repository at Yucca Mountain is a technically challenging task. As is noted in Section II, the analysis involves the modeling of complex hydrologic, thermal, chemical, and mechanical interactions over times spanning tens to hundreds of thousands of years. Many of the technical questions that are necessarily addressed in this analysis, for example, the distribution of the time for corrosion to breach the waste canisters, are at the forefront of the capabilities of present day science. With these complexities in mind, the TSPA Peer Review Panel has evaluated work that has been done and that is in progress. This first interim report reflects the Panel's initial review, subject to the following significant limitations: The Total System Performance Assessment (TSPA) supporting the Viability Assessment (VA) has not yet been written and, thus, the Panel is reviewing a work in progress. The Panel has available to it previous TSPA reports and various technical reports prepared in support of TSPA. The Panel also has been given briefings on the work being done for the TSPA-VA and has sent Panel members to abstraction meetings conducted by the TSPA-VA team to assign priorities to key technical issues and provide simplified versions of analyses suitable for an integrated analysis of the site as a whole. Members of the Panel have also attended other project workshops. The design of the repository is evolving. A number of aspects of the design have changed since the Panel's first meeting or are under review. Examples include the use of Alloy 625 instead of Alloy 825 as the inner corrosion resistant material of the waste canisters, the potential use of a gravel or sand backfill in the drifts, and consideration of alternative configurations for spent fuel containing highly enriched uranium. The Panel is still in an orientation phase. This is a large and technically diverse project with a long history. In the few months since the Panel's first meeting, members have not had sufficient time to review all relevant documents or to learn of all the work that is being done to support the TSPA-VA.

Site Characterization Progress Report

Site Characterization Progress Report PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Radioactive waste disposal in the ground
Languages : en
Pages : 840

Get Book Here

Book Description


Viability Assessment of a Repository at Yucca Mountain: Total system performance assessment

Viability Assessment of a Repository at Yucca Mountain: Total system performance assessment PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Radioactive waste disposal in the ground
Languages : en
Pages : 528

Get Book Here

Book Description


Energy and Water Development Appropriations for 1999

Energy and Water Development Appropriations for 1999 PDF Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Energy development
Languages : en
Pages : 1014

Get Book Here

Book Description


Energy and Water Development Appropriations for 1999: Department of Energy fiscal year 1999 budget justifications

Energy and Water Development Appropriations for 1999: Department of Energy fiscal year 1999 budget justifications PDF Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Energy development
Languages : en
Pages : 3256

Get Book Here

Book Description


Report to the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Secretary of Energy

Report to the U.S. Congress and the U.S. Secretary of Energy PDF Author: United States. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Radioactive waste disposal
Languages : en
Pages : 172

Get Book Here

Book Description


Energy and Water Development Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2000

Energy and Water Development Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2000 PDF Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 888

Get Book Here

Book Description


Progress Report on the Scientific Investigation Program for the Nevada Yucca Mountain Site

Progress Report on the Scientific Investigation Program for the Nevada Yucca Mountain Site PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Radioactive waste disposal in the ground
Languages : en
Pages : 180

Get Book Here

Book Description


Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel

Total System Performance Assessment Peer Review Panel PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description


Peer Review in the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology

Peer Review in the Department of Energy-Office of Science and Technology PDF Author: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309174457
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 67

Get Book Here

Book Description
The Office of Science and Technology (OST) of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE's) Office of Environmental Management (EM) recently has instituted a peer review program that uses the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), with administrative and technical support provided by the Institute for Regulatory Science (RSI), to conduct peer reviews of technologies (or groups of technologies) at various stages of development. OST asked the NRC to convene an expert committee to evaluate the effectiveness of its new peer review program and to make specific recommendations to improve the program, if appropriate. This is the first of two reports to be prepared by this committee on OST's new peer review program. OST requested this interim report to provide a preliminary assessment of OST's new peer review program. In the final report, the committee will provide a more detailed assessment of OST's peer review program after its first complete annual cycle.