The Michigan Accountability Model PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download The Michigan Accountability Model PDF full book. Access full book title The Michigan Accountability Model by Michigan. Department of Education. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Michigan. Department of Education
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Educational accountability
Languages : en
Pages : 16
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Michigan. Department of Education
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Educational accountability
Languages : en
Pages : 16
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Christopher J. Adams
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Educational accountability
Languages : en
Pages : 150
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Kent John Chabotar
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Educational accountability
Languages : en
Pages : 80
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Michigan. Experimental and Demonstration Centers Program
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Educational accountability
Languages : en
Pages : 2
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Michigan. Department of Education
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Educational accountability
Languages : en
Pages : 48
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Ernest R. House
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Educational accountability
Languages : en
Pages : 42
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Catherine L. Stehly
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 278
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Harvey Bleecher
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Educational accountability
Languages : en
Pages : 598
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Jennifer A. Gruber
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electronic dissertations
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
School accountability is the primary method the United States public education system uses to monitor the quality of local and state education systems and promote positive educational outcomes. The current accountability system under the Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015 (ESSA) grants states the autonomy to design their own policies and metrics for school and district performance. Researchers and educators have raised concerns about these accountability systems, including their approach to identifying schools and districts that need improvement, their potential harmful consequences, and their lack of attention to the structural causes of educational inequities. School is only one system-albeit an impactful, important one-within a student's social ecology. Schools with lower performance are often situated within contexts that perpetuate inequities and limit their ability to respond to the barriers their students face.Using two sources of publicly available education data that report various student-, school-, and district-level characteristics (MI School Data and Civil Rights Data Collection), I conducted an exploratory study of schools in 12 public school districts that-as of September 2021-had a partnership agreement with the Michigan Department of Education (i.e., were the focus of state-level intervention under the current Michigan school accountability system). Specifically, I used multilevel modeling to examine school- and district-level measured indicators of structural factors (e.g., school staff-to-student ratios; district finances) and student achievement (e.g., test scores) and disciplinary (e.g., suspensions) outcomes and their relations over time in schools in these 12 school districts relative to a matched comparison sample. I also incorporated an explicit focus on equity by examining the extent to which these relationships differed across student subgroups by race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and disability status.My primary aims were to examine the extent to which: (1) partnership district schools differed from matched comparison district schools on student outcomes over time; (2) proxies for structural factors (e.g., enrollment, financial status) impacted student outcomes; and (3) partnership district schools differed from matched comparison district schools in terms of equity.℗ For my first aim, I found that partnership district schools had worse average academic outcomes than matched comparison district schools, but the differences between the schools were stable throughout the years of data included in my study. Given the stability of these differences, comprehensive school reform or community-level supports might be the best approach to address deeply rooted barriers faced by schools. For my second aim, I found that several structural factors (e.g., student mobility, the enrollment of historically marginalized students) accounted for academic outcomes over and above school accountability metrics. Given the potential consequences schools face if they do not meet the specific goals outlined in the agreements, it is important to consider how data on these structural factors could be leveraged to identify areas to best support schools or to account for factors outside of a school's control. Less clear patterns emerged for disciplinary outcomes, which might be an important area for future research and consideration. For my third aim, I was only able to examine differences across student subgroups for one outcome (math growth percentiles). I found that all student subgroups except Latine students had worse math growth percentiles in partnership district schools compared to matched comparison district schools, but few structural factors emerged as statistically significant to explain these differences. Overall, my findings suggest specific areas of promise for Michigan and other states to better align their school accountability systems with ESSA's goals of providing an equitable, holistic education.
Author: Kwangyhuyn Lee
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 16
Get Book Here
Book Description
Michigan is designing a new accountability system that combines high standards and statewide testing within a school accreditation framework. Sound assessment techniques are critical if the accountability system is to provide relevant information to schools and policymakers. One important component of a sound assessment system is measurement of student learning during the school year. Two primary ways of assessing student learning are absolute measures of achievement and value-added assessment. Value-added assessment attempts to distinguish learning that occurs because of factors that the school can control from learning that is affected by uncontrollable factors. By measuring the value that was added to a student's achievement by a school, rather than by factors outside of the school's control, a school can be held accountable for the performance of students in that building. Absolute measures of student achievement such as average scores provide a snapshot of learning but do not allow separation of school and non-school influences on student achievement. This paper is divided into three sections. Section I examines the background of value-added assessment and discusses why it should be part of Michigan's accountability system. Section II compares the implementation of value-added testing in several states and examines similarities and differences between the models. Section III outlines steps that would be necessary to implement a value-added system in Michigan. Michigan has recognized that its current accountability system is inadequate. The state has begun the process of developing an accountability system that includes construction of a Single Record Student Database and the development of an annual testing program, use of multiple indicators in evaluating student progress, and instituting a set of rewards for schools where students meet state goals for progress. While there is no one best system of accountability, the fairness of the system must be a key concern. When educators perceive a system as fair, they are more likely to accept and support the system. When teachers are provided with fair assessments of student achievement, they can use the information in a thoughtful manner to reflect on and improve their instruction. An important component of any fair accountability system is the inclusion of a value-added testing program. Value-added testing responds to the state superintendent's request that, before implementing any new program, the question is asked, "What does this do to help teachers teach and students learn?" By providing teachers, parents, legislators, and the general public with a fair measure of student learning, value-added testing helps to ensure that the accountability system is a tool for improved teaching and learning. (Contains 2 footnotes and 1 table.).
