The Effect of an Instructional Model Utilizing Hands-On Learning and Manipulatives on Math Achievement of Middle School Students in Georgia PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download The Effect of an Instructional Model Utilizing Hands-On Learning and Manipulatives on Math Achievement of Middle School Students in Georgia PDF full book. Access full book title The Effect of an Instructional Model Utilizing Hands-On Learning and Manipulatives on Math Achievement of Middle School Students in Georgia by Kara White. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Kara White
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Mathematics
Languages : en
Pages : 113
Get Book Here
Book Description
The concepts and ideas of mathematics is a major element of educational curriculum. Many different instructional strategies are implemented in mathematics classrooms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of an instructional model utilizing hands-on learning and use of manipulatives on mathematics achievement of middle school students. A quasi-experimental non-equivalent control-group design was used to examine 145, seventh-grade students from a North Georgia middle school. Data was collected to analyze if changes were experienced in pretest/posttest scores. A Mann-Whitney test was run and revealed initial group differences between the whole control and whole experimental groups, and also between average-achieving control participants and average-achieving experimental participants. An ANCOVA was then run to analyze the null hypotheses for the first and third research questions, revealing that there was no significant difference between posttest scores of the control and experimental groups when compared as whole groups. In addition, no significant differences were found between posttest scores of average-achieving participants in the control and experimental groups. Individual Mann-Whitney tests were used to examine the second and fourth research questions. The results showed that there were no significant differences between two of the subgroups (low-achieving control versus low-achieving experimental, high-achieving control versus high-achieving experimental) of the control and experimental groups.
Author: Kara White
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Mathematics
Languages : en
Pages : 113
Get Book Here
Book Description
The concepts and ideas of mathematics is a major element of educational curriculum. Many different instructional strategies are implemented in mathematics classrooms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of an instructional model utilizing hands-on learning and use of manipulatives on mathematics achievement of middle school students. A quasi-experimental non-equivalent control-group design was used to examine 145, seventh-grade students from a North Georgia middle school. Data was collected to analyze if changes were experienced in pretest/posttest scores. A Mann-Whitney test was run and revealed initial group differences between the whole control and whole experimental groups, and also between average-achieving control participants and average-achieving experimental participants. An ANCOVA was then run to analyze the null hypotheses for the first and third research questions, revealing that there was no significant difference between posttest scores of the control and experimental groups when compared as whole groups. In addition, no significant differences were found between posttest scores of average-achieving participants in the control and experimental groups. Individual Mann-Whitney tests were used to examine the second and fourth research questions. The results showed that there were no significant differences between two of the subgroups (low-achieving control versus low-achieving experimental, high-achieving control versus high-achieving experimental) of the control and experimental groups.
Author: David Ramenofsky
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Mathematics
Languages : en
Pages : 106
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Crystal Heyward Gantt
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Academic achievement
Languages : en
Pages : 320
Get Book Here
Book Description
Educators are faced with diverse populations, and determining the best way to meet the needs of all students has posed a challenge. This task has been compounded in math classes because nationwide, students have math deficits. The Math Workshop Model provides a classroom structure where the instructional time is chunked into three major components: mini-lesson, student centered, and closure. Each component is focused on strategically and purposefully introducing and practicing content at or near student ability levels. This multimethod research study investigated the impact of the Math Workshop Model on classroom instruction and student achievement in a southeastern suburban school district. The study examined seventh-grade students’ math MAP Growth scores on assessments before and after the implementation of the Math Workshop Model. A Repeated Measures ANOVA test was run to determine if the Math Workshop Model had a significant impact on student achievement based on four spring MAP assessments. Teacher survey data were used to gather information on how teachers use the Math Workshop Model and its effectiveness on student achievement. The results of the study showed that the Math Workshop Model has a significant impact on student achievement. Most subgroups of students’ MAP scores decreased as a result of receiving instruction through the Math Workshop Model structure. Gifted students’ scores increased when the Math Workshop Model was in place. Teacher perception surveys showed that teachers think using the Math Workshop is an effective strategy to increase differentiated instruction, student collaboration, student engagement, and student achievement.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 732
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Crystal Allen
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 18
Get Book Here
Book Description
The purpose of this study is to find out if meaningful educational activities and the use of a manipulative in those activities might have an impact on student achievement. Using manipulative as cognitive tools should improve the teaching and learning process, and encourage student reflections on retaining the information. It has been claimed that the usage of a manipulative not only increases student achievement, but also allows them to improve their conceptual understanding and problem solving skills. The use of a manipulative can also promote a student to have a positive attitude toward mathematics. The research was completed was an action research project with one fifth grade math class over the course of three days. The subjects in this group participate in program by the name of Everyday Math, which they are required to take a pretest and posttest before they are taught any lessons in that unit. Each unit consists of hands-on manipulative, games, partner activities, and everyday mathematics tools. The research was based off of a pretest given the first day, and introduction to the unit using manipulatives on the second day, and a posttest on the third day. All students were given the exact instructions on using pattern blocks to understand the relationship of interior angles in various polygons. All students were given the same pretest and posttest. The results of my study revealed that students using a manipulative improved their level of achievement, increased their understanding, and promoted a positive attitude to a mathematical concept that they previously struggled with before using a manipulative. (Pre-Test and Post-Test Scores/Changes/Averages are appended.).
Author: Charles Moore
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Mathematics
Languages : en
Pages : 154
Get Book Here
Book Description
Educators are seeking ways to improve student academic achievement in math and to increase math standardized test scores because of the requirements of the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, known as the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and Race to the Top initiative (RTTT). One such intervention in middle school is a direct-instruction math program. This causal-comparative study examined the relationship between a direct-instruction math intervention and math achievement on standardized test scores of at-risk middle school students. This study compared the differences in the mean scale scores for at-risk middle-school students who received a direct-instruction math intervention and at-risk middle school students who did not receive a direct-instruction math intervention on the math subtest of the 2012 Georgia Criterion Referenced Competency Test, while using the 2011 scores as a control variable to control for previous math ability using a one-way between-groups analysis of covariate (ANCOVA) statistical test. Further, this study compared the relationship, by gender, between a direct-instruction math intervention and math achievement on standardized test scores. The data from the study suggests that the direct-instruction mathematic intervention did result in the intervention group having a significantly higher mean scale score on the 2012 mathematic subtest of the Georgia CRCT than the control group for both genders.
Author: Jean Lowery
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Mathematical ability
Languages : en
Pages : 66
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Curtis T. L. Hunter
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Academic achievement
Languages : en
Pages : 260
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dissertation abstracts
Languages : en
Pages : 776
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Jadwiga Domino
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 126
Get Book Here
Book Description
Even though there numerous books, articles, research studies, and other publications written since National Council of Teacher of Mathematics (NCTM) published Curriculum and Evaluation Standards of School Mathematics in 1989 have advocated the use of manipulatives in the teaching of mathematics, there is no conclusive evidence showing that the use of manipulatives helps students attain higher achievement in mathematics. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to investigate the overall effect of using manipulatives in mathematics instruction, compared to traditional instructional methods, on students' achievement in mathematics in kindergarten through Grade 6. After formulating the research question, the following steps were undertaken: developing a coding form, gathering research studies by searching the literature, coding the appropriate information from each study, calculating effect sizes, and analyzing and interpreting the effect sizes.^The coding form developed for this study included study characteristics such as year of publication, type of publication, study design, student ability level, SES of the students, type of community, type of measuring instrument, and duration of treatment. These nine study characteristics became the moderator variables of this study and it was found that they had a significant impact on the overall mean effect size. Eight electronic data bases and 12 peer-reviewed journals were searched to locate both published and unpublished studies conducted in the U.S. between 1989 and 2010. Eligible studies met the following search criteria: manipulative use was compared to manipulative nonuse, students were in kindergarten through Grade 6, sufficient information was reported for the calculation of effect sizes, and a control group/treatment group design was used.^The search of online databases and education journals revealed 1035 articles about manipulatives and yielded 31 primary studies that met the search criteria. These studies represented 5288 students and produced 35 effect sizes. The mean effect size was 0.50 with a confidence interval between 0.34 and 0.65. These results indicate that students who used manipulatives during mathematics instruction had statistically significant higher mathematics achievement than students who were taught by traditional teaching methods. A 0.50 effect size can be interpreted to mean that students who used manipulatives scored one-half of a standard deviation higher on mathematics achievement tests than students who did not use manipulatives. This improvement in achievement implies that the average student who used manipulatives performed better than 69% of the students who did not use manipulatives.^An implication of this research study is that there is evidence that student achievement in mathematics in kindergarten through Grade 6 can be improved as a result of using manipulatives. Implications for practice are that curriculum supervisors can confidently recommend policies that include manipulatives in the teaching of mathematics, teacher educators should guide future teachers in the proper use of manipulatives, and professional development personnel can encourage and prepare teachers to incorporate the use of manipulatives in their teaching practices.
