The Difference in Self-efficacy Scores Among Students who Participate in Work-based Learning and Those who Do Not Based on Their Disability Status in Community College Programs

The Difference in Self-efficacy Scores Among Students who Participate in Work-based Learning and Those who Do Not Based on Their Disability Status in Community College Programs PDF Author: Kimberly Brown
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : College students with disabilities
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book Here

Book Description
Students with disabilities are attending higher education institutes at an increasing rate due to the programs and retention practices developed in k-12 classrooms. A concern for community colleges is the student’s ability to transition into the workforce after graduation. A high percentage of students with disabilities are unemployed. It is essential to study factors that can contribute to a student’s ability or inability to successfully transition into employment after matriculation. Self-efficacy has been associated with academic success and could be a determinate for employment status. The purpose of this study was to determine if self-efficacy levels differ between students with and without disabilities who do or do not participate in work-based learning. Work-based learning is a program-specific internship experience designed to develop students’ hard and soft skills, job awareness, and professional network. The causal-comparative study determined the effect of work-based learning and disability status on students’ self-efficacy. Self-efficacy was measured using the General Self-Efficacy Scale. The data was collected from 14 North Carolina community colleges using convenience sampling. The data was analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The two-way ANOVA yielded no statistical significance between self-efficacy scores between students with and without disabilities who did or did not participate in work-based learning. The difference between self-efficacy scores in students with and without disabilities was statistically significant and therefore support previous research studies’ assertations. Future studies should compare students’ self-efficacy scores over a semester to determine if there is a positive or negative change.

The Difference in Self-efficacy Scores Among Students who Participate in Work-based Learning and Those who Do Not Based on Their Disability Status in Community College Programs

The Difference in Self-efficacy Scores Among Students who Participate in Work-based Learning and Those who Do Not Based on Their Disability Status in Community College Programs PDF Author: Kimberly Brown
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : College students with disabilities
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book Here

Book Description
Students with disabilities are attending higher education institutes at an increasing rate due to the programs and retention practices developed in k-12 classrooms. A concern for community colleges is the student’s ability to transition into the workforce after graduation. A high percentage of students with disabilities are unemployed. It is essential to study factors that can contribute to a student’s ability or inability to successfully transition into employment after matriculation. Self-efficacy has been associated with academic success and could be a determinate for employment status. The purpose of this study was to determine if self-efficacy levels differ between students with and without disabilities who do or do not participate in work-based learning. Work-based learning is a program-specific internship experience designed to develop students’ hard and soft skills, job awareness, and professional network. The causal-comparative study determined the effect of work-based learning and disability status on students’ self-efficacy. Self-efficacy was measured using the General Self-Efficacy Scale. The data was collected from 14 North Carolina community colleges using convenience sampling. The data was analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The two-way ANOVA yielded no statistical significance between self-efficacy scores between students with and without disabilities who did or did not participate in work-based learning. The difference between self-efficacy scores in students with and without disabilities was statistically significant and therefore support previous research studies’ assertations. Future studies should compare students’ self-efficacy scores over a semester to determine if there is a positive or negative change.

Resources in Education

Resources in Education PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 760

Get Book Here

Book Description


Dissertation Abstracts International

Dissertation Abstracts International PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dissertations, Academic
Languages : en
Pages : 796

Get Book Here

Book Description


Accessible Health Programs Promoting Physical Activity and Fitness Level

Accessible Health Programs Promoting Physical Activity and Fitness Level PDF Author: Guoxin Ni
Publisher: Frontiers Media SA
ISBN: 2832519849
Category : Medical
Languages : en
Pages : 153

Get Book Here

Book Description


Exceptional Child Education Resources

Exceptional Child Education Resources PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Special education
Languages : en
Pages : 702

Get Book Here

Book Description


Index Medicus

Index Medicus PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Medicine
Languages : en
Pages : 2098

Get Book Here

Book Description
Vols. for 1963- include as pt. 2 of the Jan. issue: Medical subject headings.

Current Index to Journals in Education

Current Index to Journals in Education PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 1264

Get Book Here

Book Description


The Complete Book of Colleges, 2013 Edition

The Complete Book of Colleges, 2013 Edition PDF Author: Princeton Review
Publisher: Princeton Review
ISBN: 0307944921
Category : Study Aids
Languages : en
Pages : 1418

Get Book Here

Book Description
Profiles every four-year college in the United States, providing detailed information on academic programs, admissions requirements, financial aid, services, housing, athletics, contact names, and campus life.

Abstracts ... Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association and Related Organizations

Abstracts ... Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association and Related Organizations PDF Author: American Public Health Association. Annual Meeting
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Public health
Languages : en
Pages : 426

Get Book Here

Book Description


Social Foundations of Thought and Action

Social Foundations of Thought and Action PDF Author: Albert Bandura
Publisher: Prentice Hall
ISBN:
Category : Juvenile Nonfiction
Languages : en
Pages : 644

Get Book Here

Book Description
Models of human nature and causality; Observational learning; Enactivelearning; Social diffusion and innovation; Predictive knowledge and forethought; Incentive motivators; Vicarious motivators; Self-regulatory mechanisms; Self-efficacy; Cognitive regulators.