Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789798885174
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
SURVEY OF US HIGHER EDUCATION FACULTY 2023, USE OF GOOGLE SCHOLAR.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789798885174
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789798885174
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Survey of US Higher Education Faculty 2023, Use of Google Scholar
Author: Primary Research Group Inc.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Survey of US Higher Education Faculty 2023, Use of Academic Libraries Other Than One's Own
Author: Primary Research Group Inc.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
This study looks at how often academics use the libraries of other institutions, and in general how aware are scholars about arrangements allowing them to use other academic libraries. The study also presents data on faculty satisfaction with their access to the libraries of other institutions. In an era of extensive cross-institution scholarly collaboration, the report also details the satisfaction level of faculty with the ease with which faculty from other institutions can use the home libraries of their collaborators. This study is based on data from a survey of 806 higher education faculty randomly chosen from nearly 500 colleges and universities in the USA. Data is broken out by personal variables such as work title, gender, personal income level, academic discipline, age and other variables, as well as institutional indicators such as college or university type or Carnegie class, enrollment size, public or private status and others. Just a few of this 65-page report's many findings are that: ?Use of other institutions libraries was greatest among faculty in history and journalism, of which 73.68% and 76.92% of faculty respectively had used the academic library of another institution.?Faculty from BA-level institutions were more aware than those of other types of colleges and universities of the existence of resource-sharing agreements between their own and other institution's libraries.?By academic title, adjuncts were the least satisfied with resource-sharing arrangements.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
This study looks at how often academics use the libraries of other institutions, and in general how aware are scholars about arrangements allowing them to use other academic libraries. The study also presents data on faculty satisfaction with their access to the libraries of other institutions. In an era of extensive cross-institution scholarly collaboration, the report also details the satisfaction level of faculty with the ease with which faculty from other institutions can use the home libraries of their collaborators. This study is based on data from a survey of 806 higher education faculty randomly chosen from nearly 500 colleges and universities in the USA. Data is broken out by personal variables such as work title, gender, personal income level, academic discipline, age and other variables, as well as institutional indicators such as college or university type or Carnegie class, enrollment size, public or private status and others. Just a few of this 65-page report's many findings are that: ?Use of other institutions libraries was greatest among faculty in history and journalism, of which 73.68% and 76.92% of faculty respectively had used the academic library of another institution.?Faculty from BA-level institutions were more aware than those of other types of colleges and universities of the existence of resource-sharing agreements between their own and other institution's libraries.?By academic title, adjuncts were the least satisfied with resource-sharing arrangements.
Survey of US Higher Education Faculty 2023, Use of Academic Libraries Other Than One’s Own
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789798885174
Category : Academic libraries
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
"This study looks at how often academics use the libraries of other institutions, and in general how aware are scholars about arrangements allowing them to use other academic libraries. The study also presents data on faculty satisfaction with their access to the libraries of other institutions. In an era of extensive cross-institution scholarly collaboration, the report also details the satisfaction level of faculty with the ease with which faculty from other institutions can use the home libraries of their collaborators. This study is based on data from a survey of 806 higher education faculty randomly chosen from nearly 500 colleges and universities in the USA. Data is broken out by personal variables such as work title, gender, personal income level, academic discipline, age and other variables, as well as institutional indicators such as college or university type or Carnegie class, enrollment size, public or private status and others." -- from publisher website
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789798885174
Category : Academic libraries
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
"This study looks at how often academics use the libraries of other institutions, and in general how aware are scholars about arrangements allowing them to use other academic libraries. The study also presents data on faculty satisfaction with their access to the libraries of other institutions. In an era of extensive cross-institution scholarly collaboration, the report also details the satisfaction level of faculty with the ease with which faculty from other institutions can use the home libraries of their collaborators. This study is based on data from a survey of 806 higher education faculty randomly chosen from nearly 500 colleges and universities in the USA. Data is broken out by personal variables such as work title, gender, personal income level, academic discipline, age and other variables, as well as institutional indicators such as college or university type or Carnegie class, enrollment size, public or private status and others." -- from publisher website
SURVEY OF US HIGHER EDUCATION FACULTY 2023, USE OF CHATGPT IN SCHOLARLY APPLICATIONS.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789798885174
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789798885174
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Survey of US Higher Education Faculty 2023, Posting Scholarly Articles to Twitter and LinkedIn
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Online social networks
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Online social networks
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
SURVEY OF US HIGHER EDUCATION FACULTY 2023, POSTING SCHOLARLY ARTICLES TO TWITTER & LINKEDIN.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789798885174
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789798885174
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Survey of US Higher Education Faculty 2023, Use of Course Reserves
Author: Primary Research Group Inc.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
This study gives extensive data on how US higher education faculty use course reserves, particularly through their academic libraries. The study helps its readers to answer questions such as: which faculty use course reserves? How much? How satisfied are they with the services academic libraries provide for course reserves? Do they put print materials on course reserve? Digital materials? How easy is it to use course reserves? How easy is it to integrate course reserves with course management systems? What can be done to improve course reserve systems? This 70-page study is based on data from a survey of 806 higher education faculty randomly chosen from nearly 500 colleges and universities in the USA. Data is broken out by personal variables such as work title, gender, personal income level, academic discipline, age and other variables, as well as institutional indicators such as college or university type or Carnegie class, enrollment size, public or private status and others. Just a few of this report's many findings are that: 34.43% of adjunct faculty in the sample put materials on course reserve in the academic library. 37.22% of faculty felt it was very easy to put materials on course reserve. Faculty of Asian origin were much more likely than others to worry that they were abrogating copyright or licensing strictures when they put materials on course reserve. Faculty at the smallest colleges were particularly dissatisfied with the ease of integrating content on course reserve into course management systems.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
This study gives extensive data on how US higher education faculty use course reserves, particularly through their academic libraries. The study helps its readers to answer questions such as: which faculty use course reserves? How much? How satisfied are they with the services academic libraries provide for course reserves? Do they put print materials on course reserve? Digital materials? How easy is it to use course reserves? How easy is it to integrate course reserves with course management systems? What can be done to improve course reserve systems? This 70-page study is based on data from a survey of 806 higher education faculty randomly chosen from nearly 500 colleges and universities in the USA. Data is broken out by personal variables such as work title, gender, personal income level, academic discipline, age and other variables, as well as institutional indicators such as college or university type or Carnegie class, enrollment size, public or private status and others. Just a few of this report's many findings are that: 34.43% of adjunct faculty in the sample put materials on course reserve in the academic library. 37.22% of faculty felt it was very easy to put materials on course reserve. Faculty of Asian origin were much more likely than others to worry that they were abrogating copyright or licensing strictures when they put materials on course reserve. Faculty at the smallest colleges were particularly dissatisfied with the ease of integrating content on course reserve into course management systems.
Survey of US Higher Education Faculty 2023, Use of Proxies to Retrieve Items at the Academic Library
Author: Primary Research Group Inc.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
This study looks closely at the use of proxies by higher education faculty to retrieve items from or represent them at academic libraries. Such programs have become more popular in recent years as more faculty work remotely and visit the library less. Some libraires have found them useful in maintaining faculty links to the library, particularly to print and audio-visual items. The report gives detailed data on the percentage and type of faculty who have used such proxy programs, and the extent of their use. In addition, Just a few of the findings from this 43-page report are that: ?Older faculty tended to be more aware of this policy than younger ones; 68.01% of faculty over age 60 felt such a policy existed vs. only 46.67% of faculty under age 30.?Use was greater by faculty who considered themselves political conservatives than those on the left wing of the political spectrum. Data in the report is based on a survey of 954 higher education faculty from nearly 500 institutions; data is broken out by a broad range of personal and institutional variables including age, gender, work title, academic field, personal income level, type of higher education institution, and other useful variables.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
This study looks closely at the use of proxies by higher education faculty to retrieve items from or represent them at academic libraries. Such programs have become more popular in recent years as more faculty work remotely and visit the library less. Some libraires have found them useful in maintaining faculty links to the library, particularly to print and audio-visual items. The report gives detailed data on the percentage and type of faculty who have used such proxy programs, and the extent of their use. In addition, Just a few of the findings from this 43-page report are that: ?Older faculty tended to be more aware of this policy than younger ones; 68.01% of faculty over age 60 felt such a policy existed vs. only 46.67% of faculty under age 30.?Use was greater by faculty who considered themselves political conservatives than those on the left wing of the political spectrum. Data in the report is based on a survey of 954 higher education faculty from nearly 500 institutions; data is broken out by a broad range of personal and institutional variables including age, gender, work title, academic field, personal income level, type of higher education institution, and other useful variables.
SURVEY OF US HIGHER EDUCATION FACULTY
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789798885174
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789798885174
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description