Supersonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Proposed Assured Crew Return Capability (ACRC) Lifting-body Configuration

Supersonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Proposed Assured Crew Return Capability (ACRC) Lifting-body Configuration PDF Author: George M. Ware
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aerodynamics, Supersonic
Languages : en
Pages : 80

Get Book Here

Book Description

Supersonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Proposed Assured Crew Return Capability (ACRC) Lifting-body Configuration

Supersonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Proposed Assured Crew Return Capability (ACRC) Lifting-body Configuration PDF Author: George M. Ware
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aerodynamics, Supersonic
Languages : en
Pages : 80

Get Book Here

Book Description


Supersonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Proposed Assured Crew Return Capability (Acrc) Lifting-Body Configuration

Supersonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Proposed Assured Crew Return Capability (Acrc) Lifting-Body Configuration PDF Author: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781722791339
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 76

Get Book Here

Book Description
An investigation was conducted in the Langley Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel at Mach numbers from 1.6 to 4.5. The model had a low-aspect-ratio body with a flat undersurface. A center fin and two outboard fins were mounted on the aft portion of the upper body. The outboard fins were rolled outboard 40 deg from the vertical. Elevon surfaces made up the trailing edges of the outboard fins, and body flaps were located on the upper and lower aft fuselage. The center fin pivoted about its midchord for yaw control. The model was longitudinally stable about the design center-of-gravity position at 54 percent of the body length. The configuration with undeflected longitudinal controls trimmed near 0 deg angle of attack at Mach numbers from 1.6 to 3.0 where lift and lift-drag ratio were negative. Longitudinal trim was near the maximum lift-drag ratio (1.4) at Mach 4.5. The model was directionally stable over Mach number range except at angles of attack around 4 deg at M = 2.5. Pitch control deflection of more than -10 deg with either elevons or body flaps is needed to trim the model to angles of attack at which lift becomes positive. With increased control deflection, the lifting-body configuration should perform the assured crew return mission through the supersonic speed range. Ware, George M. Langley Research Center...

Aerodynamic Characteristics and Control Effectiveness of the HL-20 Lifting Body Configuration at Mach 10 in Air

Aerodynamic Characteristics and Control Effectiveness of the HL-20 Lifting Body Configuration at Mach 10 in Air PDF Author: William I. Scallion
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Airplanes
Languages : en
Pages : 62

Get Book Here

Book Description
A 0.0196-scale model of the HL-20 lifting body, one of several configurations proposed for future crewed spacecraft, was tested in the Langley 31-Inch Mach 10 Tunnel. The purpose of the tests was to determine the effectiveness of fin-mounted elevons, a lower surface flush-mounted body flap, and a flush-mounted yaw controller at hypersonic speeds. The nominal angle-of-attack range, representative of hypersonic entry, was 20 to 41 degrees, the sideslip angles were 0, 2, and -2 degrees, and the test Reynolds number was 1.06 x 10[factor 6] based on model reference length. The aerodynamic, longitudinal, and lateral control effectiveness along with surface oil flow visualizations are presented and discussed. The configuration was longitudinally and laterally stable at the nominal center of gravity. The primary longitudinal control, the fin-mounted elevons, could not trim the model to the desired entry angle of attack of 30 degrees. The lower surface body flaps were effective for roll control and the associated adverse yawing moment was eliminated by skewing the body flap hinge lines. A yaw controller, flush-mounted on the lower surface, was also effective, and the associated small rolling moment was favorable.

Subsonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of the HL-20 Lifting-body Configuration

Subsonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of the HL-20 Lifting-body Configuration PDF Author: George M. Ware
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aerodynamics
Languages : en
Pages : 36

Get Book Here

Book Description


Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports

Scientific and Technical Aerospace Reports PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aeronautics
Languages : en
Pages : 482

Get Book Here

Book Description


Transonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Proposed Assured Crew Return Capability (ACRC) Lifting-body Configuration

Transonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Proposed Assured Crew Return Capability (ACRC) Lifting-body Configuration PDF Author: George M. Ware
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aerodynamics, Transonic
Languages : en
Pages : 80

Get Book Here

Book Description


NASA Technical Memorandum

NASA Technical Memorandum PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aeronautics
Languages : en
Pages : 364

Get Book Here

Book Description


Transonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Proposed Assured Crew Return Capability (Acrc) Lifting-Body Configuration

Transonic Aerodynamic Characteristics of a Proposed Assured Crew Return Capability (Acrc) Lifting-Body Configuration PDF Author: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781722847289
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 74

Get Book Here

Book Description
The investigation was conducted in the Calspan 8-Ft Transonic wind tunnel at Mach numbers from 0.6 to 1.2. The 0.07-scale model had a low aspect ratio body with a flat undersurface. A center fin and two tip fins were mounted on the aft upper body. The tip fins were rolled outboard 40 deg from the vertical. Elevon surfaces made up the trailing edges of the outboard fins and body flaps were located on the upper and lower aft fuselage. Results of the investigation indicated that the model was longitudinally and laterally stable about a center-of-gravity position of 0.54 body length. The maximum trimmed lift-drag ratio was about 3.1 at M = 0.6. The small center fin contributed only a small positive increment to lateral stability but was effective as a yaw control device. Protuberances on the forebody had little effect on the aerodynamic characteristics of the configuration. The model with pitch controls undeflected had desirable longitudinal trim characteristics. Ware, George M. Langley Research Center...

Control Effectiveness and Tip-fin Dihedral Effects for the HL-20 Lifting-body Configuration at Mach Numbers from 1.6 to 4.5

Control Effectiveness and Tip-fin Dihedral Effects for the HL-20 Lifting-body Configuration at Mach Numbers from 1.6 to 4.5 PDF Author: Christopher I. Cruz
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aerodynamics
Languages : en
Pages : 96

Get Book Here

Book Description


Large Space Structures & Systems in the Space Station Era

Large Space Structures & Systems in the Space Station Era PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Large space structures (Astronautics)
Languages : en
Pages : 356

Get Book Here

Book Description