Superfund Contracts

Superfund Contracts PDF Author: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Hazardous waste sites
Languages : en
Pages : 68

Get Book Here

Book Description

Superfund Contracts

Superfund Contracts PDF Author: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Hazardous waste sites
Languages : en
Pages : 68

Get Book Here

Book Description


Superfund Contracts

Superfund Contracts PDF Author: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Conflict of interests
Languages : en
Pages : 44

Get Book Here

Book Description


Assessing contractor use in Superfund : a background paper of OTA's assessment on Superfund implementation.

Assessing contractor use in Superfund : a background paper of OTA's assessment on Superfund implementation. PDF Author:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428922113
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 48

Get Book Here

Book Description


The Status of the Superfund Contracting Program and Its Relation to Surety Bonding Issues

The Status of the Superfund Contracting Program and Its Relation to Surety Bonding Issues PDF Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Environment and Public Works. Subcommittee on Superfund, Ocean, and Water Protection
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Contractors
Languages : en
Pages : 106

Get Book Here

Book Description


Superfund Contracts

Superfund Contracts PDF Author: U S Government Accountability Office (G
Publisher: BiblioGov
ISBN: 9781289144432
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 42

Get Book Here

Book Description
In response to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the adequacy of the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) system for preventing conflicts of interest among its Superfund contractors. GAO found that: (1) prior to 1988, EPA did little before contract award to determine whether its Superfund contractors had procedures to prevent conflicts of interest; (2) although EPA periodically reviewed its contractors' performance, the reviews did not routinely verify contractor compliance with EPA conflict-of-interest requirements; (3) EPA did not properly document conflict-of-interest cases, case resolutions, or actions on contractor private-party work requests in its contract files, as required; (4) EPA did not provide contractors with specific guidance for avoiding conflicts beyond its regulations and contract clauses; and (5) EPA contracting officers differed on the information they required contractors to include in their private-party work requests, due to lack of formal guidelines and definitive criteria for evaluating contractor requests.

Superfund

Superfund PDF Author: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Hazardous substances
Languages : en
Pages : 56

Get Book Here

Book Description


Superfund

Superfund PDF Author: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Hazardous waste sites
Languages : en
Pages : 32

Get Book Here

Book Description


Superfund Program Management

Superfund Program Management PDF Author: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental policy
Languages : en
Pages : 48

Get Book Here

Book Description


Superfund Contracts

Superfund Contracts PDF Author: U S Government Accountability Office (G
Publisher: BiblioGov
ISBN: 9781289147785
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 70

Get Book Here

Book Description
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed contractor performance at 43 hazardous waste sites to determine if the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had established adequate controls to ensure high-quality, cost-effective, and timely work under its Superfund remedial study contracts. GAO found that EPA: (1) lacked adequate information to evaluate contractors' work plans and proposed costs; (2) did not adequately monitor contractors' expenditures; (3) did not always perform required contract administration duties, such as reviewing contractor invoices and maintaining complete work assignment files; (4) believed that inadequate contractor performance resulted in cost increases at 22 sites, but challenged cost increases at only 4 sites; (5) believed that cost challenges were difficult and time-consuming and that the contracts required it to pay for costs the contractor incurred; (6) focused on timeliness and quality of remedial studies, rather than their costs; and (7) had options for dealing with increased costs, including negotiating with the contractor to absorb costs, authorizing the increase but not a corresponding increase in the base or award fee, not authorizing the increase, terminating the contract, or disallowing the questionable cost. GAO also found that the award fee process EPA used with remedial study contractors: (1) allowed a contractor to earn the majority of an award during the first phase of the award fee process, before it completed the study and before EPA could assess its quality; and (2) contributed to overall contracting difficulties, since EPA performance evaluation criteria did not require assessment of subcontracting management.

Superfund: Interagency Agreements and Improved Project Management Needed to Achieve Cleanup Progress at Key Defense Installations

Superfund: Interagency Agreements and Improved Project Management Needed to Achieve Cleanup Progress at Key Defense Installations PDF Author: John B. Stephenson
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1437937926
Category : Reference
Languages : en
Pages : 73

Get Book Here

Book Description
Before the passage of federal environmental legislation in the 1970s and 1980s, DoD activities contaminated millions of acres of soil and water on and near DoD sites. The EPA has oversight authorities for cleaning up contaminants on federal property, and has placed 1,620 of the most contaminated sites -- including 141 DoD installations -- on its National Priorities List (NPL). As of Feb. 2009, after 10 or more years on the NPL, 11 DoD installations had not signed the required interagency agreements (IAG) to guide cleanup with EPA. This report examined: (1) the status of DoD cleanup of hazardous substances at selected installations that lacked IAGs; and (2) obstacles, if any, to cleanup at these installations. Figures. This is a print on demand publication.