Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Roads
Languages : en
Pages : 160

Get Book Here

Book Description

Author: Rawan Ramadhan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Roads
Languages : en
Pages : 52

Get Book Here

Book Description
In 1960, there were 74,431,800 vehicles registered in the United States. Looking at the most recent data currently available shows that in 2016 there were 268,799,083 registered vehicles in the United States. Roadway facilities constructed in the 1960s were not designed to handle vehicular traffic of these proportions. The ever increasing volumes of motor vehicle traffic at heavily traveled interchanges and intersections heighten the risk of single or multiple vehicle crashes particularly when they are not designed to manage high volumes. Traffic engineers from state and federal departments of transportation have responded to calls for safer roads and interchanges in some areas that have been identified as dangerous because of an increase in fatal and non-fatal motor vehicle crashes. In the road network the highway system and the local street system are related. According to the Federal Highway Administration, "the term interchange means the junction of two or more streets requiring partial or complete grade separation." Interchanges located in urban areas are utilized to facilitate traffic flow between arterial roadways and freeways on- and off-ramps. Congestion and safety are the two main objectives traffic engineers consider while remodeling an interchange design. Several types of renovated interchanges are normally considered to meet the growing population mobility needs. The Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) is one of the solutions has been considered since 1974 but it was flourished and implemented in the 1990s. The other innovative interchange solution appeared first in France in the mid-1970s known as Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI). Likewise, the DDIs did not gain popularity back then until in the 2000s. The first DDI in the United States was constructed in 2009 in Springfield, Missouri.The main aim of this study is to compare the performance of traffic flow between SPUI and DDI based on existing traffic data for a peak hour retrofitting an existing Conventional Diamond Interchange (CDI). The analysis of the two interchange designs in conjunction with the existing design are used in the comparison study to identify which interchange design performs best among each other. The Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs) used in this study include queue delay, queue length, vehicle delay and stopped delay. This study obtain traffic turning movements and signal timing data from the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT). The turning movement counts (TMC) were taken from ODOT's Transportation Data Management System for the year 2017. VISSIM version 11 software was used for microscopic simulation. The optimum signal phasing for the three interchange designs were obtained from SYNCHRO 10 software based on the PM peak hour traffic data. The virtual interchange network design geometry in both software programs were almost identical. Several assumptions were made to stay consistent as much as possible while comparing the three designs since they have completely different geometric layouts. For example, the existing CDI data included the through movements from off-ramps to on-ramps. Since the two alternative designs (SPUI and DDI) exclude the through movements from off-ramps to on-ramps, their data were added to the right turn movements. Moreover, the speed limit was set to be in the range of 30 mph while driving in the interchange to meet all three design specifications.The analysis of results show that there are significant advantages and disadvantages associated with each design (CDI, SPUI and DDI). During implementation, various factors such as cost, efficiency, safety, delay, etc., need to be considered when attempting to select the best design, which would be the most appropriate method as these may vary from situation to situation. However, in the current study, a DDI performed best, followed by a SPUI, and then CDI was last. Moreover, CDI with its signal timing optimized very highly improved all MOEs considered when compared with the CDI with existing signal timing.

Author: Afia Sultana
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781622604692
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Service interchanges connect freeways to arterial roads and are the backbone of the U.S. road network. Improving the operations of service interchanges is possible by applying one of several new solutions: diverging diamond, single point interchanges, and double or single roundabout diamonds.VISSIM was used to perform 13,500 experiments to simulate the traffic performance of the studied alternative interchanges during a typical day for a wide range of geometry and traffic scenarios. Five performance measures were investigated: daily-average delay, level of service of critical movement, daily-average number of stops, longest off-ramp queue, and longest crossing road queue. The obtained daily-average delays at the alternative interchanges were consistent with expectations. Roundabouts had the highest average delay while single-point interchanges had the lowest average delays. Roundabouts exhibited the lowest numbers of stops among all the alternatives in the low traffic range up to non-freeway 30,000 veh/day. Diverging diamonds tended to have the shortest and roundabouts tended to have the longest queues on their off-ramps. Overall, single-point interchanges had the shortest queues among all the alternatives.The study developed guidelines for early stage screening of alternative diamond. The guidelines exhibit performance measures for 25 traffic and geometric scenarios and a wide range of traffic volumes. The guidelines provide a fair comparison procedure for alternative diamond interchanges in the preliminary planning and conceptual design stages.

Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Express highway interchanges
Languages : en
Pages : 71

Get Book Here

Book Description
Tight diamond interchanges (TDI) and single point urban interchanges (SPUIs) are generally types of interchanges that can be used interchangeably in areas where right-of-way is constrained. There are limited amount of research conducted regarding the operational analysis and comparison of these two interchanges. The research that has been done regarding this topic are outdated and generally conclude that SPUIs perform better or about the same. Without knowing the true performances of the two interchange designs, it would make it difficult for engineers and planners to choose between the two interchanges. This research study will use the current updated version of the micro-simulation software, PTV VISSIM to analyze and compare the performance of the SPUI and the tight diamond interchange. The research will look at reconstructing a current tight diamond interchange into a SPUI in Wilsonville, Oregon to see how it will perform. The analysis was conducted for 7 varying volume levels for both the interchanges including the existing volume conditions. The volume conditions include multiplying the ramp volumes by 0.75, 1.25, and 1.4 as well as doing the same for the eastbound and westbound movements. The results of the analysis shows that the SPUI performs similarly compared to the tight diamond interchange for lower volume conditions, but perform very poorly for higher volume conditions. The SPUI in this location is more sensitive to volume change and does not perform as well as the tight diamond interchange. The SPUI performs better than the TDI by only 1.4 seconds for low ramp volume conditions with regards to average delay per vehicle and performs 31.2 seconds worst for high ramp volume conditions. Therefore, the SPUI should not be implemented at this location as it is not feasible for high volumes and not cost effective. SPUIs should be implemented carefully as it is not suitable for all places.

Author: Carroll J. Messer
Publisher: Transportation Research Board
ISBN: 9780309048682
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 116

Get Book Here

Book Description

Author: Nicholas J. Garber
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Roads
Languages : en
Pages : 116

Get Book Here

Book Description
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the safety and operational characteristics of the single point urban interchange (SPUI) and the diamond interchange (DI) and develop guidelines that identify traffic and/or geometric conditions that favor one type of interchange over the other. State traffic engineers across the country were surveyed as to their experiences and opinions of the two types of interchanges in terms of operational performance and safety. Accident and operational data were also obtained for nine SPUIs and eight DIs. The interchange operations were studied using both field data and the computer simulation program TRAF-NETSIM. In addition, for each DI simulated, an SPUI counterpart was designed with the same geometric and traffic conditions for further comparison. No significant differences were found in the off-ramp, cross road, and overall interchange average delay. Ten volume scenarios were then developed and simulated for both interchanges at low- and high-volume conditions to analyze the effect of various traffic patterns on the relative operational performance of each interchange type. The accident data for the SPUIs and DIs were compared according to severity, collision type, and location on the interchange. No significant differences were found between the severity distribution and rates of the two interchange types. However, the proportion of on-ramp and off-ramp accidents was greater at the SPUI, and the proportion of accidents occurring in the center of the signalized intersection was greater at the DI. The proportion of angle accidents was greater at DIs than at SPUIs, whereas the proportions of rearend on-ramp, sideswipe, and fixed object accidents were greater at SPUIs. Vehicle conflicts at four interchanges in Virginia were also investigated and used along with the accident analysis results. The operational results, safety analyses, literature review, and survey of state engineers were used to develop guidelines to aid traffic engineers in the selection and design of the appropriate interchange type.

Author: Jim C. Lee
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Roads
Languages : en
Pages : 218

Get Book Here

Book Description
This research compares two interchange types, the Tight Urban Diamond Interchange (TUDI) and the Four Phase Single Point Urban Interchange (40SPUI). The 40SPUI is referred to in this report as a Single Point Urban Interchange with Frontage Roads (SPUI/F). The objectives of this research were to: (1) evaluate the SPUI/F based on available accident data and conflict analysis techniques, right-of-way and construction costs, and operating efficiency; (2) compare the performance of the SPUI/F and the TUDI; (3) evaluate current SPUI/F design assumptions and operation and recommend design and/or operational changes to enhance performance; and (4) evaluate the interchange form selection (pre-design) process and recommend changes where appropriate. The research found no significant difference in the safety aspects of the two interchange types. The SPUI/F generally did not perform as well operationally as the TUDI, with increased SPUI/F delay as the distance between frontage roads increased.

Author: Afia Sultana
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781622604708
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Service interchanges connect freeways to arterial roads and are the backbone of the U.S. road network. Improving the operations of service interchanges is possible by applying one of several new solutions: diverging diamond, single point interchanges, and double or single roundabout diamonds.VISSIM was used to perform 13,500 experiments to simulate the traffic performance of the studied alternative interchanges during a typical day for a wide range of geometry and traffic scenarios. Five performance measures were investigated: daily-average delay, level of service of critical movement, daily-average number of stops, longest off-ramp queue, and longest crossing road queue. The obtained daily-average delays at the alternative interchanges were consistent with expectations. Roundabouts had the highest average delay while single-point interchanges had the lowest average delays. Roundabouts exhibited the lowest numbers of stops among all the alternatives in the low traffic range up to non-freeway 30,000 veh/day. Diverging diamonds tended to have the shortest and roundabouts tended to have the longest queues on their off-ramps. Overall, single-point interchanges had the shortest queues among all the alternatives.The study developed guidelines for early stage screening of alternative diamond. The guidelines exhibit performance measures for 25 traffic and geometric scenarios and a wide range of traffic volumes. The guidelines provide a fair comparison procedure for alternative diamond interchanges in the preliminary planning and conceptual design stages.

Author: James Allen Bonneson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Roads
Languages : en
Pages : 482

Get Book Here

Book Description

Author: James A. Bonneson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Roads
Languages : en
Pages : 76

Get Book Here

Book Description