Strategic Opportunities in the Property and Liability Insurance Industry PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Strategic Opportunities in the Property and Liability Insurance Industry PDF full book. Access full book title Strategic Opportunities in the Property and Liability Insurance Industry by Serng Jae Kim. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Serng Jae Kim
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Insurance
Languages : en
Pages : 424
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Serng Jae Kim
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Insurance
Languages : en
Pages : 424
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: J. David Cummins
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 9400956584
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 321
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Geneva Association and Risk Economics The Geneva Association The Geneva Association (International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics) commenced its activities in June 1973, on the initiative of twenty-two members in eight European countries. It now has fifty-four members in sixteen countries in Europe and in the United States. The members of the association are insurance companies which provide financial support for its activities. The aims and strategy of the Geneva Association were clearly defined in 1971 by the founding committee. They were set forth in the first report to the Assembly of Members in 1974: "To make an original contribution to the progress of insurance by objective studies on the interdependence between economics and insurance." In pursuit of this objective, the Association strives to place insurance problems in the context of the modern economy and to overcome the antagonism between different groups and institutions by showing that they all have a common interest in tackling the problem of risk in a changing world. In consequence, the studies made by the Association had to move away from the subjects familiar to insurance professionals and explore related fields, dealing with opinions and behavior falling outside the profession's vii FOREWORD viii traditional framework of analysis. It is in this direction that the Association's preoccupations have been directed from the beginning, towards areas in which insurance activities come into contact with those of other economic sectors such as government, banking, manufacturing, and households.
Author: Beverly J. Frickel
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 326
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: J David Cummins
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 71
Get Book Here
Book Description
The paper examines efficiency and productivity of US property-liability (P-L) insurers using data envelopment analysis (DEA). We estimate pure technical, scale, cost, revenue and profit efficiency over the period 1993-2011. Insurers' adjacent year total factor productivity changes and their contributing factors are also investigated. In particular, we explore the relationship of insurers' efficiency with their ownership structure, product and distribution strategies. Regression analyses are also performed to explore the relationships between firm characteristics, efficiency and productivity. The results indicate US P-L insurance industry has improved its efficiency and productivity over time. Insurers' product strategy, distribution system, and diversification strategy are important determinants of insurers' efficiency and productivity, along with other firm characteristics.
Author: Yuan Du
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 80
Get Book Here
Book Description
This dissertation consists of two chapters. Chapter 1 focuses on the barriers that diversifying companies could face and explore how barriers to entry differ across different types of entry. Chapter 2 turns the attention to the market competition among insurance companies that are already in a market and examines how product bundling impact insurers' market power. Chapter 1 proposes and estimates a multi-agent model of entry. The prior literature often treats the number of companies in a market as an exogenous measure of market structure. However, the number of companies is endogenously decided by the market structure and other participants. Thus, I propose a structural model of entry to address the endogenous entry decision. In addition, the estimations are conducted at each market-year level, therefore, it provides an opportunity to delineate the relative importance of barriers to entry across three dimensions: geographic, product, and time. I find that barriers to entry exist in the financial services industry, and can be quite substantial to the \textit{de novo} entrants. Overall, I find \textit{de novo} entrants are the ones most subject to barriers to entry across all markets. Expanding within a state is as costly as expanding within a product line. Upon further examination, I discover that product-specific knowledge, such as underwriting expertise, pricing schemes, and coverage designs, plays a critical role in a successful expansion. This information is also relatively more important than state-specific connections, such as how well the company knows its customers and connections with distribution channels. Among all product lines, I find that expertise in mortgage guaranty insurance creates the most barriers, and these barriers are most subject to impacts of the financial crisis. In Chapter 2, I turn the focus to the market competition \emph{within} a market and explore the impact of product bundling on market power. Product bundling is a popular way for companies to retain their customers and keep up with fast-changing market demand. In this chapter, I will specifically examine the impact of bundling on price elasticity for personal lines of insurance. Insurance demand estimation is well-explored in the literature because it is difficult to obtain individual-level data. I overcome this hurdle by using a random coefficients logit model, which incorporates flexible consumer preferences over companies' characteristics. The second difficulty in insurance demand estimation is that it is hard to find a good instrument for the endogenous price. Therefore, I propose a novel instrument, which exploits an idiosyncrasy in insurance tax laws for identification. I find that bundling, on average, can reduce consumers' price sensitivity. Thus, companies that can offer bundle-able products experience a less elastic demand and achieve market power. However, product bundling has differential impacts on the auto insurance and homeowners' insurance markets. Auto insurers that offer bundled packages experience less elastic demand in response to price increases. However, we do not observe similar patterns in the homeowners' insurance market, where doing so intensifies price elasticity. With a closer examination, we discover that the different valuation in homeowners is not driven by the financial ratings of insurers. This indicates that homeowners tend to value other characteristics, such as claims management and the quality of service, more than just price of the contract.
Author: avi fiegenbaum and howard thomas
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 56
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Kenneth David Wilson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business planning
Languages : en
Pages : 152
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Arthur D. Little, Inc
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Insurance
Languages : en
Pages : 50
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Patty Duijm
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Martin F. Grace
Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield
ISBN: 0815703864
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 244
Get Book Here
Book Description
A Brookings Institution Press and Georgia State University publication Important changes have buffeted the insurance industry over the past decade. The 1999 repeal of key provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act unleashed a wave of conglomeration in financial services, as bank holding companies acquired insurance and securities businesses and, to a much lesser degree, insurance companies acquired securities firms and banks. Rivalry within the sector has intensified: insurance companies have developed products that compete directly with the offerings of banks and securities firms and vice versa. In addition, the industry has become increasingly global. Against this backdrop, pressure has been building for fundamental changes to the structure of insurance regulation in the United States. Despite several court challenges over the years, insurance continues to be regulated by the states. Many insurance companies view state regulation as an increasing drag on their efficiency and competitiveness and support a federal regulatory system. However, powerful stakeholders, including state officials, state and regional insurance companies, and many insurance agents, oppose federal regulation. As a result, proposals to establish an optional federal charter (OFC) for insurance companies and agents remain mired in fierce debate. The Future of Insurance Regulation in the United States gathers some of the country's leading experts on financial regulation to assess the case for an enhanced federal role in the insurance sector. They pay particular attention to the merits of an OFC and how it might be designed. They also consider the principles that should guide insurance regulatory policies, regardless of the institutional framework, and examine the implications of financial convergence and the internationalization of insurance markets for an optimal regulatory structure. The debate over insurance regulation has only grown in complexity and intensity since the financial crisis began in the fall of 2008. This book will both inform and help to shape those critical discussions. Contributors: John A. Cooke (International Financial Services London), Robert Detlefsen (National Association of Mutual Insurance Companies), Martin F. Grace (Georgia State University), Robert W. Klein (Georgia State University), Robert E. Litan (Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation and Brookings Institution), Phil O’Connor (PROactive Strategies), Hal S. Scott (Harvard Law School), Harold D. Skipper (Georgia State University), Peter J. Wallison (American Enterprise Institute).
