Storm Sewer System Evaluation (AREE 70) Report. Base Realignment and Closure Environmental Evaluation (BRAC EE) Fort Devens, Massachusetts. Volume II, Revision 2, Appendix A. PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Storm Sewer System Evaluation (AREE 70) Report. Base Realignment and Closure Environmental Evaluation (BRAC EE) Fort Devens, Massachusetts. Volume II, Revision 2, Appendix A. PDF full book. Access full book title Storm Sewer System Evaluation (AREE 70) Report. Base Realignment and Closure Environmental Evaluation (BRAC EE) Fort Devens, Massachusetts. Volume II, Revision 2, Appendix A. by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 657
Get Book Here
Book Description
Appendix A contains a list of methods and analyte CRLs and Laboratory and field QC sample results related to the evaluation of the Storm Sewer System at Fort Devens, Massachusetts.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 657
Get Book Here
Book Description
Appendix A contains a list of methods and analyte CRLs and Laboratory and field QC sample results related to the evaluation of the Storm Sewer System at Fort Devens, Massachusetts.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 346
Get Book Here
Book Description
Fifty-five storm sewer systems and three surface water bodies were evaluated as part of the Base Realignment and Closure Environmental Evaluation (BRAC EE) at Fort Devens. The purpose of this evaluation was to identify potential sources of contamination that were not identified through previous investigations. This evaluation also provides data on potential contaminant pathways that can be used to supplement other investigations/evaluations at Fort Devens. The 55 storm sewer systems and three surface water bodies were located on the Main and North Posts of Fort Devens. Each storm sewer system was route verified to identify the system's flow location and direction. All AREEs, Study Areas (SAs), and Areas of Concern (AOCs) associated with the storm systems were identified. Sediment and surface water samples were collected in locations that best captured potential upstream sources of contaminants.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 12
Get Book Here
Book Description
Basewide environmental investigations were performed on Fort Devens from 1993 through 1995 in support of Base Realignment and Closure Environmental Evaluation activities. Seven basewide programs or Areas Requiring Environmental Evaluation (AREEs), were investigated during this time period. Supplemental sampling at select sites was recommended in the final reports for two AREEs, AREE 70 (Storm Sewer Evaluation) and AREE 69 (Past Spill Sites). This supplemental sampling event was performed in support of those recommendations.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 52
Get Book Here
Book Description
This decision document has been prepared to support a no further action decision at Study Area 58 - Buildings 2648 and 2650 Fuel Oil Spills (SA 58) at Fort Devens, Massachusetts. The report was prepared as part of the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) program to assess the nature and extent of contamination associated with site operations at Fort Devens. In conjunction with the Army's Installation Restoration Program (IRP), Fort Devens and the U.S. Army Environmental Center (USAEC; formerly the U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency) initiated a Master Environmental Plan (MEP) in 1988. The MEP consists of assessments of the environmental status of SAS, specifies necessary investigations, and provides recommendations for response actions with the objective of identifying priorities for environmental restoration at Fort Devens. SA 58 was identified in the MEP as a potential source of contamination. On December 21, 1989, Fort Devens was placed on the National Priorities List under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 284
Get Book Here
Book Description
This report presents the results of the Community Environmental Response Facilitation Act (CERFA) investigation conducted by Arthur D. Little, Inc. at Fort Devens, a U.S. Government property selected for closure by the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Commission. The primary objective of this investigation as required under CERFA, is for federal agencies to expeditiously identify real property offering the greatest opportunity for immediate reuse and redevelopment. The property examined under this investigation is a 9,280-acre site located approximately 35 miles northwest of Boston, Massachusetts. Arthur D. Little reviewed existing investigation documents, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), state, and county regulatory records, environmental data bases, and title documents pertaining to Fort Devens during this investigation. This information was used to divide the installation into four categories of parcels: CERFA parcels, CERFA parcels with qualifiers, CERFA disqualified parcels, and CERFA excluded parcels. Arthur D. Little's investigation and subsequent parcelization of the installation determined that approximately 2,526 acres of the facility fall within the CERFA parcel category. Approximately 566 acres of the facility were identified as CERFA parcels with qualifiers, approximately 1,305 acres of installation property are identified as CERFA disqualified parcels, and approximately 4,883 areas of the facility were identified as CERFA excluded parcels, essentially the entire South Post.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 38
Get Book Here
Book Description
Investigations of Study Area 10 (Construction Debris Area) at Fort Devens, Massachusetts, have resulted in the decision that no further studies or remediation are required at this site. Study Area 10 was identified in the Federal Facilities Agreement between the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Defense as a potential site of contamination. Fort Devens was placed on the National Priorities List under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act on December, 21, 1989. In addition, under Public Law 101-510, the Defense Base Realignment and Closure Act of 1990, Fort Devens was selected for cessation of operations and closure. In accordance with these acts and to support the overall mission of environmental restoration and base closure, numerous studies have been conducted that address Study Areas at Fort Devens, including a Master Environmental Plan, an Enhanced Preliminary Assessment, and Site Investigation Reports.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 26
Get Book Here
Book Description
Investigations of Study Area 59 (Bridge 526) at Fort Devens, Massachusetts, have resulted in the decision that no further studies or remediation are required at this site. Study Area 59 was identified in the Federal Facilities Agreement between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Department of Defense as a potential site of contamination. Fort Devens was placed on the National Priorities List under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act on December, 21, 1989. In addition, under Public Law 101-510, the Defense Base Realignment and Closure Act of 1990, Fort Devens was selected for cessation of operations and closure. In accordance with these acts and to support the overall mission of environmental restoration and base closure, numerous studies have been conducted that address study areas at Fort Devens, including a Master Environmental Plan (Argonne National Laboratory, 1992), an Enhanced Preliminary Assessment (Weston, 1992), and Site Investigation Reports (ABB, 1992 and Arthur D. Little, 1993a).
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 714
Get Book Here
Book Description
Harding Lawson Associates (HLA) has prepared this Remedial Investigation (RI) Report on Area of Contamination (AOC) 57 to support Task Order 001 of Contract DACA-31-94-D-0061 under the oversight of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers - New England District. This RI Report details the results of the RI and previous investigations completed at AOC 57 Areas 1, 2, and 3. Fort Devens was identified for cessation of operations and closure under Public Law 101-510, the Defense Base Realignment and Closure Act of 1990, and was officially closed in September 1996. Portions of the property formerly occupied by Fort Devens were retained by the Army for reserve forces training and renamed the Devens Reserve Forces Training Area (RFTA). Areas not retained as part of the Devens RFTA were, or are in the process of being, transferred to new owners for reuse and redevelopment. AOC 57 is located in an area planned for transfer to the Massachusetts Government Land Bank for industrial/trade related development and recreation/open space.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 640
Get Book Here
Book Description
These appendices concern remedial investigations at Fort Devens Sudbury Training Annex in Maynard, Massachusetts. Items shown are geotechnical data, geophysical surveys, water level measurements, groundwater elevation data, aquifier hydraulic characterization, groundwater model report, Sudbury background data, ecological investigation field forms, and water quality parameters.
Author: United States. Department of Defense. Office of the Deputy Inspector General for Policy and Oversight
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Military bases
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
On October 13, 2010, the DoD IG Technical Assessment Directorate initiated a detailed independent engineering assessment of the sufficiency of the Army's Final Environmental Assessment Implementation of 2005 Base Realignment and Closure Recommendation 133, dated July 2008 (BRAC 133 EA), and the Transportation Management Plan for BRAC 133 at the Mark Center, dated July 2010 (BRAC 133 TMP). The assessment was undertaken in response to a requirement of the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011, Section 2704, "Transportation Plan for BRAC 133 Project under Fort Belvoir, Virginia, BRAC Initiative," (Public Law 111-383). The Act directed that the DoD IG "submit to the congressional defense committees a report evaluating the sufficiency and coordination conducted in completing the requisite environmental studies associated with the site selection of the BRAC 133 project." We issued a draft report, considered your comments, and are releasing our final findings, recommendations, and report. As reported in the February 24, 2011 draft, we determined that the proposed traffic mitigations in the BRAC 133 EA may not be sufficient to support the Finding of No Significant Impact (FNSI) and recommended that the Army perform a reassessment of the transportation effects, including a traffic impact analysis and monitoring program. The Army responded to our draft stating that they do not intend to perform any new traffic analyses because recent studies sufficiently support the suggested improvements. However, we found that the recent studies were inadequate to support the FNSI and are standing by our recommendation. We also found that the 2010 BRAC 133 TMP did not include or sufficiently address several critical travel demand management strategies and recommended that that the Army revise and update the BRAC 133 TMP and conduct a more technically robust, standalone traffic impact analysis. The Army agreed to revise the TMP; but did not agree to conduct a more technically robust traffic impact analysis, stating that more recent traffic studies were sufficient. However, the recent traffic studies did not adequately address existing and projected peak hour traffic volumes; appropriate site variables; and effects of BRAC 133 traffic on additional intersections and interchanges beyond the narrowly defined BRAC 133 EA and/or TMP study limits. Therefore, we are standing by our recommendations.
