A Selection of Cases on the Law of Torts. By J.B. Ames and Jeremiah Smith ... Second Edition PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download A Selection of Cases on the Law of Torts. By J.B. Ames and Jeremiah Smith ... Second Edition PDF full book. Access full book title A Selection of Cases on the Law of Torts. By J.B. Ames and Jeremiah Smith ... Second Edition by James Barr Ames. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: James Barr Ames
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: James Barr Ames
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: James Barr Ames
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: James Barr Ames
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Torts
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Jeremiah Smith
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Torts
Languages : en
Pages : 184
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: James Barr Ames
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Torts
Languages : en
Pages : 916
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: James Barr Ames
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Torts
Languages : en
Pages : 165
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: James Barr Ames
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: James Barr Ames
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Torts
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: James Barr Ames
Publisher: Legare Street Press
ISBN: 9781019666166
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
A Selection of Cases on the Law of Torts is a respected and widely-used legal textbook that presents key cases and doctrines in the field of tort law. This book is a valuable resource for law students and practitioners seeking to deepen their knowledge of this important area of the law. This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work is in the "public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
Author: James Barr Ames
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780674288850
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 1040
Get Book Here
Book Description
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1910. Excerpt: ... decided. By the common law of England it is only a person of unsound mind and dangerous to himself or others that may be restrained of his liberty by another. Such is taken to be law from the case in Bro. Abr. down to the last case on the subject. Mr. Bovill has gravely contended that the plea showed that the plaintiff pretended to be a madman expressly that he might be shut up in an asylum; for that is what his argument amounted to. But no such meaning can be put upon it: it merely states that he acted as a person of unsound mind. Then, shall it be said that the fact of any person acting so as to appear of an unsound mind is to be a justification for another locking him up as a lunatic? It would be most dangerous to the liberty of the subject if such a doctrine were to prevail. Ira furor brevis est; and there are many persons of eccentric habits, but still entirely in possession of their faculties, as we know from cases of contested wills, yet they may be said to be of unsound mind; and it would be monstrous to say that, because some persons chose to suppose they were lunatics, they might be locked up as such. The plea goes on to allege that a certificate of two physicians had been obtained. But where is the authority at common law for saying that if one or two men, physicians, if you will, say that another is a lunatic, that will justify a third person in taking him and confining him as a lunatic? On the other hand, the statute, instead of being of any service to the defendant, affords an argument against him; for the protection given by it to persons acting under certain circumstances in pursuance of it in regard to alleged lunatics would be unnecessary if the merely acting as a person of unsound mind would be sufficient to justify another in arresting...
