Environmental Impact Statement of the Construction and Operation of a Proposed Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Environmental Impact Statement of the Construction and Operation of a Proposed Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina PDF full book. Access full book title Environmental Impact Statement of the Construction and Operation of a Proposed Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility at the Savannah River Site, South Carolina by . Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author:
Publisher: Government Printing Office
ISBN: 9780160732621
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 1104
Get Book Here
Book Description
Evaluates the potential environmental impacts of a proposed mixed oxide fuel (MOX) fabrication facility that would convert depleted uranium and weapons-grade plutonium into MOX fuel.
Author:
Publisher: Government Printing Office
ISBN: 9780160732621
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 1104
Get Book Here
Book Description
Evaluates the potential environmental impacts of a proposed mixed oxide fuel (MOX) fabrication facility that would convert depleted uranium and weapons-grade plutonium into MOX fuel.
Author: Mary Beth Reed
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 728
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Radioactive waste disposal in the ground
Languages : en
Pages : 1204
Get Book Here
Book Description
The purpose of this environmental impact statement (EIS) is to provide information on potential environmental impacts that could result from a Proposed Action to construct, operate and monitor, and eventually close a geologic repository for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste at the Yucca Mountain site in Nye County, Nevada. The EIS also provides information on potential environmental impacts from an alternative referred to as the No-Action Alternative, under which there would be no development of a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 504
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 512
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Appropriations. Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Energy development
Languages : en
Pages : 1018
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 592
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 592
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 790
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309101700
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 214
Get Book Here
Book Description
DOE Tank Waste: How clean is clean enough? The U.S. Congress asked the National Academies to evaluate the Department of Energy's (DOE's) plans for cleaning up defense-related radioactive wastes stored in underground tanks at three sites: the Hanford Site in Washington State, the Savannah River Site in South Carolina, and the Idaho National Laboratory. DOE plans to remove the waste from the tanks, separate out high-level radioactive waste to be shipped to an off-site geological repository, and dispose of the remaining lower-activity waste onsite. The report concludes that DOE's overall plan is workable, but some important challenges must be overcomeâ€"including the removal of residual waste from some tanks, especially at Hanford and Savannah River. The report recommends that DOE pursue a more risk-informed, consistent, participatory, and transparent for making decisions about how much waste to retrieve from tanks and how much to dispose of onsite. The report offers several other detailed recommendations to improve the technical soundness of DOE's tank cleanup plans.
