Representing Plaintiffs in Title VII Actions PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Representing Plaintiffs in Title VII Actions PDF full book. Access full book title Representing Plaintiffs in Title VII Actions by Kent Spriggs. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Kent Spriggs
Publisher: Aspen Publishers
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 664
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Kent Spriggs
Publisher: Aspen Publishers
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 664
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Kent Spriggs
Publisher: Panel Pub
ISBN: 9780735501577
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 3672
Get Book Here
Book Description
Building on a landmark in legal publishing, Representing Plaintiffs in Title VII Actions, Second Edition offers you a wide array of legal tools for mastering the basic theories, case management methods, discriminatory practices, class actions, dispositions, and remedies in this vital area of the law. Written in clear, concise language, this unique two-volume set includes a wealth of updated information on Title VII cases, including: Summary judgment A greatly expanded discussion of jury trials A groundbreaking chapter on religious discrimination A section on race and national origin An important chapter on choice of forum An expanded discussion of sexual harassment litigation with an explanation of new decisions from the Supreme Court Extensive analysis of damages and the preserving of damage awards And more. Representing Plaintiffs in Title VII Actions also discusses and analyzes cases that illustrate the use of expert witnesses, showing you how to prepare and present those witnesses to your best advantage. Representing Plaintiffs in Title VII Actions allows you to acquire the expertise you need to build and win your Title VII case.
Author: Robert E. McKnight
Publisher: Aspen Publishers
ISBN: 9780735562011
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 576
Get Book Here
Book Description
Representing Plaintiffs in Title VII Actions, Third Edition offers you a wide array of legal tools for mastering the basic theories, case management methods, discriminatory practices, class actions, dispositions, and remedies in this vital area of the law. Written in clear, concise language, this unique resource includes a wealth of updated information on Title VII cases, including: Summary judgment A greatly expanded discussion of jury trials A groundbreaking chapter on religious discrimination A section on race and national origin An important chapter on choice of forum An expanded discussion of sexual harassment litigation with an explanation of new decisions from the Supreme Court Extensive analysis of damages and the preserving of damage awards And more. Representing Plaintiffs in Title VII Actions also discusses and analyzes cases that illustrate the use of expert witnesses, showing you how to prepare and present those witnesses to your best advantage. Representing Plaintiffs in Title VII Actions allows you to acquire the expertise you need to build and win your Title VII case. Representing Plaintiffs in Title VII Actions has been updated to include: New chapters on attorney's fees/costs and ethical issues in representing plaintiffs Supreme Court coverage: new case discussion including Thompson v. N. American Stainless, LP; Staub v. Proctor Hospital; AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion; Fox v. Vice; Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes; Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. Winn; and Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson Religion discrimination: coverage of case now before the Supreme Court, Hosanna-Tabor Church v. EEOC, 597 F.3d 769 (6th Cir. 2010), cert. granted, No. 10-553 (U.S. March 28, 2011) New discovery topics including plaintiffs' use of social networking Discussion of emerging issues in the law of mixed-motives causation Thorough coverage of Title VII protected categories, including reasonable accommodation for religion and equal pay based on sex Consolidated discussion of harassment - all Title VII protected categories covered in one chapter Procedural guides - getting through the EEOC and getting into court, and dealing with dispositive motions once you're there
Author: Robert E. McKnight (Jr.)
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781454857969
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 1128
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Kent Spriggs
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780471192428
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 850
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Kent Spriggs
Publisher: Wiley Law Publications
ISBN: 9780471148821
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 602
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Kent Spriggs
Publisher: Wiley Law Publications
ISBN: 9780471115281
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 272
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Landmark Publications
Publisher: Independently Published
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 540
Get Book Here
Book Description
THIS CASEBOOK contains a selection of U. S. Court of Appeals decisions that analyze and discuss the elements of a Title VII prima facie case. Volume 2 of the casebook covers the Sixth through the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. In order to establish a prima facie case of retaliation under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a), [a plaintiff] must show that "(1) he engaged in activity protected by Title VII; (2) his exercise of such protected activity was known by the defendant; (3) thereafter, the defendant took an action that was 'materially adverse' to the plaintiff; and (4) a causal connection existed between the protected activity and the materially adverse action." Laster, 746 F.3d at 730 (quoting Jones v. Johanns, 264 F. App'x 463, 466 (6th Cir. 2007)). [...] To prove causation in a Title VII retaliation case, a plaintiff must show that the employee's protected activity was a "but for" cause of the employer's adverse action against her, meaning the adverse action would not have occurred absent the employer's desire to retaliate. Univ. of Tex. Sw. Med. Ctr. v. Nassar, 570 U.S. 338, 352, 360, 133 S.Ct. 2517, 186 L.Ed.2d 503 (2013). In other words, "a plaintiff must produce sufficient evidence from which an inference could be drawn that the adverse action would not have been taken had the plaintiff not filed a discrimination action" or otherwise engaged in protected activity. Nguyen v. City of Cleveland, 229 F.3d 559, 563 (6th Cir. 2000). At the prima facie stage, this burden "is not onerous," and can be met through "evidence that defendant treated the plaintiff differently from similarly situated employees or that the adverse action was taken shortly after the plaintiff's exercise of protected rights." Id. George v. Youngstown State University, 966 F. 3d 446 (6th Cir. 2020)
Author: Landmark Publications
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781981063826
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 546
Get Book Here
Book Description
THIS CASEBOOK contains a selection of U. S. Court of Appeals decisions that analyze and discuss the elements of a prima facie case under Title VII. * * * In addition to facing liability by creating a hostile work environment, an employer is liable under Title VII and § 1981 when it subjects an employee to disparate treatment. To show a prima facie case of disparate treatment, a plaintiff must offer evidence that "give[s] rise to an inference of unlawful discrimination." Sischo-Nownejad v. MercedCmty. Coll. Dist., 934 F.2d 1104, 1110 (9th Cir. 1991) (quoting Tex. Dep't of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 250, 253, 101 S.Ct. 1089, 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981)). One way to establish an inference of discrimination is by satisfying the prima facie elements from McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973): (1) the plaintiff belongs to a protected class, (2) he was performing according to his employer's legitimate expectations, (3) he suffered an adverse employment action, and (4) similarly situated employees were treated more favorably, or other circumstances surrounding the adverse employment action give rise to an inference of discrimination. Hawn v. Exec. Jet Mgmt., Inc., 615 F.3d 1151, 1156 (9th Cir. 2010); Godwin v. Hunt Wesson, Inc., 150 F.3d 1217, 1220 (9th Cir. 1998) (citing McDonnell Douglas, 411 U.S. at 802, 93 S.Ct. 1817). * * * Under the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework, when the plaintiff demonstrates his prima facie case, the burden shifts to the defendant to provide a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the adverse employment action. Hawn, 615 F.3d at 1155. If the defendant meets this burden, then the plaintiff "must then raise a triable issue of material fact as to whether the defendant's proffered reasons ... are mere pretext for unlawful discrimination." Id.
Author: United States. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Affirmative action programs
Languages : en
Pages : 368
Get Book Here
Book Description
