Public Opinion and the Rehnquist Court

Public Opinion and the Rehnquist Court PDF Author: Thomas R. Marshall
Publisher: State University of New York Press
ISBN: 0791478815
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 284

Get Book

Book Description
Public Opinion and the Rehnquist Court offers the most thorough evidence yet in favor of the U.S. Supreme Court representing public opinion. Thomas R. Marshall analyzes more than two thousand nationwide public opinion polls during the Rehnquist Court era and argues that a clear majority of Supreme Court decisions agree with public opinion. He explains that the Court represents American attitudes when public opinion is well informed on a dispute and when the U.S. Solicitor General takes a position agreeing with poll majorities. He also finds that certain justices best represent public opinion and that the Court uses its review powers over the state and federal courts to bring judicial decision making back in line with public opinion. Finally, Marshall observes that unpopular Supreme Court decisions simply do not endure as long as do popular decisions.

Public Opinion and the Rehnquist Court

Public Opinion and the Rehnquist Court PDF Author: Thomas R. Marshall
Publisher: State University of New York Press
ISBN: 0791478815
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 284

Get Book

Book Description
Public Opinion and the Rehnquist Court offers the most thorough evidence yet in favor of the U.S. Supreme Court representing public opinion. Thomas R. Marshall analyzes more than two thousand nationwide public opinion polls during the Rehnquist Court era and argues that a clear majority of Supreme Court decisions agree with public opinion. He explains that the Court represents American attitudes when public opinion is well informed on a dispute and when the U.S. Solicitor General takes a position agreeing with poll majorities. He also finds that certain justices best represent public opinion and that the Court uses its review powers over the state and federal courts to bring judicial decision making back in line with public opinion. Finally, Marshall observes that unpopular Supreme Court decisions simply do not endure as long as do popular decisions.

American Public Opinion and the Modern Supreme Court, 1930-2020

American Public Opinion and the Modern Supreme Court, 1930-2020 PDF Author: Thomas R. Marshall
Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield
ISBN: 1793623317
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 205

Get Book

Book Description
The United States Supreme Court is commonly thought to be an institution far removed from American public opinion. Yet nearly two-thirds of modern Supreme Court decisions reflect popular attitudes. Comparing over 500 Supreme Court decisions with timely nationwide poll questions since the mid-1930s, Thomas R. Marshall shows that most Supreme Court decisions agree with poll majorities or pluralities across time and across issues and often represent Americans’ views to the same degree as federal policymakers. This book looks beyond the litigants, economic interests, social movements, organized interest groups, or units of governments typically involved and instead examines how well the Court or the justices represent Americans’ views. Using nationwide public opinion, broken down by key subgroups, race, gender, education, and party affiliation, better describes exactly whom Supreme Court decisions and the justices’ individual votes best represent. His book will be of interest to scholars in political science, legal studies, history, and sociology.

A Court Divided

A Court Divided PDF Author: Mark V. Tushnet
Publisher: W. W. Norton & Company
ISBN: 9780393058680
Category : Constitutional law
Languages : en
Pages : 392

Get Book

Book Description
In this authoritative reckoning with the eighteen-year record of the Rehnquist Court, Georgetown law professor Mark Tushnet reveals how the decisions of nine deeply divided justices have left the future of the Court; and the nation; hanging in the balance. Many have assumed that the chasm on the Court has been between its liberals and its conservatives. In reality, the division was between those in tune with the modern post-Reagan Republican Party and those who, though considered to be in the Court's center, represent an older Republican tradition. As a result, the Court has modestly promoted the agenda of today's economic conservatives, but has regularly defeated the agenda of social issues conservatives; while paving the way for more radically conservative path in the future.

The Will of the People

The Will of the People PDF Author: Barry Friedman
Publisher: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
ISBN: 1429989955
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 623

Get Book

Book Description
In recent years, the justices of the Supreme Court have ruled definitively on such issues as abortion, school prayer, and military tribunals in the war on terror. They decided one of American history's most contested presidential elections. Yet for all their power, the justices never face election and hold their offices for life. This combination of influence and apparent unaccountability has led many to complain that there is something illegitimate—even undemocratic—about judicial authority. In The Will of the People, Barry Friedman challenges that claim by showing that the Court has always been subject to a higher power: the American public. Judicial positions have been abolished, the justices' jurisdiction has been stripped, the Court has been packed, and unpopular decisions have been defied. For at least the past sixty years, the justices have made sure that their decisions do not stray too far from public opinion. Friedman's pathbreaking account of the relationship between popular opinion and the Supreme Court—from the Declaration of Independence to the end of the Rehnquist court in 2005—details how the American people came to accept their most controversial institution and shaped the meaning of the Constitution.

The Unpublished Opinions of the Rehnquist Court

The Unpublished Opinions of the Rehnquist Court PDF Author: the late Bernard Schwartz
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0195357620
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 501

Get Book

Book Description
In the last twenty years, the veil of secrecy surrounding the workings of the United States Supreme Court has been lifted. Justice Thurgood Marshall's controversial decision to make his papers available to the public ushered in a new era of openness about the operation of the Court--but not without criticism from Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist. The Unpublished Opinions of the Rehnquist Court provides a behind-the- scenes look at the Supreme Court, showing how changes between the drafts and the Justices' final opinions have created substantial differences in the outcome of the Court's decisions. As with his two previous works The Unpublished Opinions of the Warren Court and the Unpublished Opinions of the Burger Court, author Bernard Schwartz uses private court papers to follow these decisions and explore the key role and responsibility of the Chief Justice. Among the ten cases examined by Schwartz are key abortion cases Hodgson v. Minnesota and Webster v. Reproductive Health Services-- the original draft of which would have virtually overruled Roe v. Wade--as well as a civil rights case, Patterson v. McLean Credit Union. Schwartz considers the draft opinions and explains why the drafts were not issued as the final opinions and dissents in these cases. In particular, he shows what would have happened if the draft opinions had come down as the final opinions. The Unpublished Opinions of the Rehnquist Court serves to clarify and explore the actual operation of the judicial decision-making process. It will be fascinating and informative reading for attorneys, judges, law students, politicians and anyone interested in the mechanics of the nation's highest Court.

Public Opinion and the Supreme Court

Public Opinion and the Supreme Court PDF Author: Thomas R. Marshall
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 9780044970477
Category : Judicial process
Languages : en
Pages : 214

Get Book

Book Description
Very Good,No Highlights or Markup,all pages are intact.

The Center Holds

The Center Holds PDF Author: James F. Simon
Publisher: Simon and Schuster
ISBN: 1439143250
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 342

Get Book

Book Description
The Center Holds provides an intimate look at who the Supreme Court justices are, how they have made critical decisions, and why, ultimately, the Rehnquist Revolution failed. Focusing on four key areas of civil rights and liberties—racial discrimination, abortion, criminal law, and First Amendment freedoms—The Center Holds provides an in-depth look at the Supreme Court documents that illustrate the battle between the old liberal order and emerging conservative majority, beginning in the early 1980s. James F. Simon, a former Time correspondent and contributing editor, ex-dean of New York Law School, and nationally recognized scholar of constitutional law, examines key decisions on civil rights and civil liberties in a readable, intimate look at some key Supreme Court Cases and includes absorbing descriptions of confidential memos and drafts gleaned from sources from within the court.

Supreme Court

Supreme Court PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 1362

Get Book

Book Description


The Unpublished Opinions of the Rehnquist Court

The Unpublished Opinions of the Rehnquist Court PDF Author: Bernard Schwartz
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
ISBN: 0195093321
Category : Judicial opinions
Languages : en
Pages : 501

Get Book

Book Description
Schwartz provides the draft opinions prepared by Justices in key cases during the Rehnquist Court, together with short histories, commentaries, and analyses of what happened once the drafts were circulated.

The Partisan

The Partisan PDF Author: John A. Jenkins
Publisher: Public Affairs
ISBN: 1586488872
Category : Biography & Autobiography
Languages : en
Pages : 370

Get Book

Book Description
Follows Rehnquist's career as a young lawyer in Arizona through his journey to Washington though the Warren and Burger courts to his twenty-year tenure as a Supreme Court Chief Justice who favored government power over individual rights.