Planning and Budgeting for the Federal Coal Management Program PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Planning and Budgeting for the Federal Coal Management Program PDF full book. Access full book title Planning and Budgeting for the Federal Coal Management Program by United States. Bureau of Land Management. Office of Coal Management. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Office of Coal Management
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Coal leases
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
"This report updates a report with the same title (dated June 18, 1979) which was prepared for the period fiscal year (FY) 1979 through FY 1982. The purpose of this report is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM's) coal program workload schedules and costs by state and FY through FY 1985. The report will provide the basis for the BLM FY 1981 Annual Work Plan (AWP) and will provide necessary information to allow other agencies supporting the BLM coal program to project their position and funding needs. Coal program cost projections for agencies other than the BLM are not included in this report. The report provides information on coal related land-use and activity planning schedules, a brief description of each of the components of the coal program along with the projected number to be processed and an estimate of the personnel and funding cost for processing of each component"--Page 1.
Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Office of Coal Management
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Coal leases
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
"This report updates a report with the same title (dated June 18, 1979) which was prepared for the period fiscal year (FY) 1979 through FY 1982. The purpose of this report is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the Bureau of Land Management's (BLM's) coal program workload schedules and costs by state and FY through FY 1985. The report will provide the basis for the BLM FY 1981 Annual Work Plan (AWP) and will provide necessary information to allow other agencies supporting the BLM coal program to project their position and funding needs. Coal program cost projections for agencies other than the BLM are not included in this report. The report provides information on coal related land-use and activity planning schedules, a brief description of each of the components of the coal program along with the projected number to be processed and an estimate of the personnel and funding cost for processing of each component"--Page 1.
Author: United States. Department of the Interior. Office of Coal Leasing, Planning, and Coordination
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Coal leases
Languages : en
Pages : 28
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Coal leases
Languages : en
Pages : 752
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 284
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Coal leases
Languages : en
Pages : 292
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Office of the Assistant Secretary for Land and Water Resources. Office of Coal Leasing, Planning and Coordination
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 23
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Robert Henry Nelson
Publisher: Durham, NC : Duke University Press
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 288
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Making of Federal Coal Policy provides a unique record of--as well as important future perspectives on--one of the most significant ideological conflicts in national policymaking in the last decade. The management of federally owned coal, almost one-third of the U.S.'s total coal resources, has furnished an arena for the contest between energy development and environmental protection, as well as between the federal government and the states. Robert H. Nelson has written an important historical document and a useful guide for policy analysts.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs. Subcommittee on Mines and Mining
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Coal
Languages : en
Pages : 858
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Coal leases
Languages : en
Pages : 1318
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 23
Get Book Here
Book Description
GAO reviewed the Department of the Interior's regulations for the management of existing federal coal leases and preference right lease applications (PRLA's). The objective was to identify regulatory modifications that could simplify and ultimately enhance the timely and orderly development of coal on existing coal leases and PRLA's. The subjects of principal concern to GAO were: (1) the difficulties in implementing requirements for maximum economic recovery (MER); (2) the regulatory requirements for diligent development; (3) the designation of leases as logical mining units (LMU's); (4) duplication of effort in environmental review of coal mine plans; and (5) the lack of data needed to meet regulatory requirements for processing PRLA's. GAO found that: (1) the existing and proposed regulations on MER were unnecessarily burdensome and almost impossible to administer; (2) the lack of flexibility in regulations directed at achieving more diligent development of existing federal coal leases could be adversely affecting certain leases; (3) many of the leases designated as LMU's do not qualify as such, and the Interior authority for making these designations is questionable; (4) in some instances, the mine plan review process was being reviewed by more than one organization, resulting in duplicate documents; and (5) the processing of many leases could be expedited by waiving certain regulations that were not in effect at the time the lease applications were submitted.
