Ohio's Opinion on K-12 Education and School Choice. School Choice Survey in the State PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Ohio's Opinion on K-12 Education and School Choice. School Choice Survey in the State PDF full book. Access full book title Ohio's Opinion on K-12 Education and School Choice. School Choice Survey in the State by Paul DiPerna. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Paul DiPerna
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 44
Get Book Here
Book Description
This statistically representative survey of 1,200 likely Ohio voters illustrates public opinion on a wide range of K-12 education issues. Ohioans have shared their views about "school choice," which includes school vouchers, tax-credit scholarships, charter schools, homeschooling and virtual schools. Survey responses are at odds with how Ohioans enroll their children in schools. There is a very large divide between parental schooling preferences and actual school enrollments. Forty-five percent of K-12 parents said they would like to send their child to a private school. In reality, however, approximately 10 percent of Ohio's K-12 students attend private schools. Twenty-seven percent of Ohio parents said they would like to send their child to a charter school. It is estimated nearly 4 percent of the state's K-12 student population enroll in charter schools. Sixteen percent of Ohio parents said they would choose a regular public school for their child. Approximately 86 percent of Ohio's K-12 students attend regular public schools. Ohio appears to lack a sufficient school choice system to satisfy parents' schooling preferences. Findings reinforce some conclusions drawn in an Ohio survey report released recently by the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, Catalyst Ohio, and the FDR Group. The two surveys differ in question design and ordering, as well as sampling protocols and methodology--these are important considerations for any cross-survey comparisons. However, it is generally observed in both surveys that Ohioans are not satisfied with the status quo public school system; they support the Educational Choice Scholarship Program and are open to school vouchers; they favor charter schools rather than oppose them; and they are skeptical about new public school spending. (Contains 3 footnotes.) [This poll was released jointly by the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, School Choice Ohio, Alliance for School Choice, Agudath Israel of America, Association of Christian Schools International - Ohio River Valley Region, Center for Education Reform, Children's Scholarship Fund of Greater Cincinnati, Democrats for Education Reform, and Ohio BAEO - Black Alliance for Educational Options. The poll was conducted by Strategic Vision.].
Author: Paul DiPerna
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 44
Get Book Here
Book Description
This statistically representative survey of 1,200 likely Ohio voters illustrates public opinion on a wide range of K-12 education issues. Ohioans have shared their views about "school choice," which includes school vouchers, tax-credit scholarships, charter schools, homeschooling and virtual schools. Survey responses are at odds with how Ohioans enroll their children in schools. There is a very large divide between parental schooling preferences and actual school enrollments. Forty-five percent of K-12 parents said they would like to send their child to a private school. In reality, however, approximately 10 percent of Ohio's K-12 students attend private schools. Twenty-seven percent of Ohio parents said they would like to send their child to a charter school. It is estimated nearly 4 percent of the state's K-12 student population enroll in charter schools. Sixteen percent of Ohio parents said they would choose a regular public school for their child. Approximately 86 percent of Ohio's K-12 students attend regular public schools. Ohio appears to lack a sufficient school choice system to satisfy parents' schooling preferences. Findings reinforce some conclusions drawn in an Ohio survey report released recently by the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, Catalyst Ohio, and the FDR Group. The two surveys differ in question design and ordering, as well as sampling protocols and methodology--these are important considerations for any cross-survey comparisons. However, it is generally observed in both surveys that Ohioans are not satisfied with the status quo public school system; they support the Educational Choice Scholarship Program and are open to school vouchers; they favor charter schools rather than oppose them; and they are skeptical about new public school spending. (Contains 3 footnotes.) [This poll was released jointly by the Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice, School Choice Ohio, Alliance for School Choice, Agudath Israel of America, Association of Christian Schools International - Ohio River Valley Region, Center for Education Reform, Children's Scholarship Fund of Greater Cincinnati, Democrats for Education Reform, and Ohio BAEO - Black Alliance for Educational Options. The poll was conducted by Strategic Vision.].
Author: Ohio. State School Survey Commission
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 416
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Donald J. Mook
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 368
Get Book Here
Book Description
Ohio's school funding system is complex. The average taxpayer has at best a limited understanding about how their public schools' revenues and expenditures are collected, distributed, and expended. Overlay on the already complicated funding model with a myriad of school choice options with various funding mechanisms and amounts results in increased complexity. Even educational professionals and policy makers lack a clear appreciation of all the mechanics and implications of school choice and fiscal strain it can place on local school district budgets. This study focuses on the economic impact that Ohio school choice programs have on local public school districts and its potentially deequalizing effects. A literature review traces the evolution of choice programs and their prevalence nationally, before describing Ohio's school choice options and their financing. A quantitative review of the impact of school choice programs on 11 school districts in one of Ohio's 88 counties reveals the flow of public tax dollars among public districts and between public school districts, community academies, private schools, and other educational providers. Findings illuminate the widely unrecognized interaction between school choice and the state school finance system. It furthermore reveals the potentially de-equalizing effects when local revenues, as contrasted to the state formula aid, are sent to other districts or providers, while other districts retain state aid for students they do not educate. Additionally, findings clarify the consequences for traditional public school budgets bearing pressure over local programs, decision-making, and the delivery of a "thorough and efficient" education that students are guaranteed by the Ohio Constitution.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 40
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Ohio. School Survey Committee
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Public schools
Languages : en
Pages : 84
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 11
Get Book Here
Book Description
For the past two decades, lawmakers from both parties in Ohio have invested heavily in the public education sector. As a consequence, total K-12 education funding, measured in constant dollars, has grown by over 60 percent since 1997, even as Ohio's K-12 student enrollment has shrunk by more than 24,000 students (1.4 percent) during that same time. Under Republican leadership from the mid-1990s to 2007, Ohio launched multiple school choice programs (including both charter schools and vouchers), wrote new academic standards, built accountability systems, and gave birth to STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) and Early College programs. Despite all this worthy effort, however, Ohio's young people are not nearly as well educated as they need to be and the academic payoff from Ohio's whopping investment in public education has been disappointing, to put it mildly. Yet opportunity is also at hand--the opportunity to build upon yesterday's better policy decisions, to rectify poor ones, and to make lemonade out of sour circumstance. Ohio's education system could be transformed into an effective, efficient engine of individual opportunity, academic achievement, and economic growth, even as the money flowing into it diminishes. This can only happen, however, if the state's new leadership team is prepared to defy special interests, to alter entrenched but dysfunctional practices, to end low-payoff activities and invest in those that matter, to make sweeping changes in both education funding and "HR," and to stick to its guns in the face of what will surely be intense opposition. The bad news is that pulling this off will be incredibly hard. The good news is that persevering with it might secure the state's future. To move Ohio forward in education, while spending less, this paper recommends seven policy priorities: (1) Strengthen results-based accountability for schools and those who work in them; (2) Replace the so-called "Evidence-Based Model" of school funding with a rational allocation of available resources in ways that empower families, schools, and districts to get the most bang for these bucks; (3) Invest in high-yield programs and activities while pursuing smart savings; (4) Improve teacher quality, reform teacher compensation, and reduce barriers to entering the profession; (5) Expand access to quality schools of choice of every kind; (6) Turn around or close persistently low-performing schools; and (7) Develop modern, versatile instructional-delivery systems that both improve and go beyond traditional schools.
Author: Ohio. School survey commission
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 164
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Ohio State University. College of Education
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 414
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Michael Q. McShane
Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield
ISBN: 1475857985
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 143
Get Book Here
Book Description
All across the country, in traditional public, public charter, and private schools, entrepreneurial educators are experimenting with the school day and school week. Hybrid Homeschools have students attend traditional classes in a brick-and-mortar school for some part of the week and homeschool for the rest of the week. Some do two days at home and three days at school, others the inverse, and still others split between four days at home or school and one day at the other. This book dives deep into hybrid homeschooling. It describes the history of hybrid homeschooling, the different types of hybrid homeschools operating around the country, and the policies that can both promote and thwart it. At the heart of the book are the stories of hybrid homeschoolers themselves. Based on numerous in-depth interviews, the book tells the story of hybrid homeschooling from both the family and educator perspective.
Author: Ohio State University. Bureau of Educational Research
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 392
Get Book Here
Book Description
