Nomination of Judge Clarence Thomas to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Nomination of Judge Clarence Thomas to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States PDF full book. Access full book title Nomination of Judge Clarence Thomas to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States by United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 1044
Get Book
Book Description
Sept. 10 - Oct. 13, 1991.
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 1044
Get Book
Book Description
Sept. 10 - Oct. 13, 1991.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judges
Languages : en
Pages : 540
Get Book
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Constitutional law
Languages : en
Pages : 628
Get Book
Book Description
Sept. 10 - Oct. 13, 1991.
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780160408380
Category : Judges
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judges
Languages : en
Pages : 170
Get Book
Book Description
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judges
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book
Book Description
Sept. 10 - Oct. 13, 1991.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judges
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Get Book
Book Description
Author: Denis S. Rutkus
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1437931790
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 63
Get Book
Book Description
Contents: (1) Pres. Selection of a Nominee: Senate Advice; Advice from Other Sources; Criteria for Selecting a Nominee; Background Invest.; Recess Appoint. to the Court; (2) Consid. by the Senate Judiciary Comm.: Background: Senators Nominated to the Court; Open Hear.; Nominee Appear. at Confirm. Hear.; Comm. Involvement in Appoint. Process; Pre-Hearing Stage; Hearings; Reporting the Nomin.; (3) Senate Debate and Confirm. Vote; Bringing Nomin. to the Floor; Evaluate Nominees; Filibusters and Motions to End Debate; Voice Votes, Roll Calls, and Vote Margins; Reconsid. of the Confirm. Vote; Nomin. That Failed to be Confirmed; Judiciary Comm. to Further Examine the Nomin.; After Senate Confirm.
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Judges
Languages : en
Pages : 1604
Get Book
Book Description
Author: Michael Comiskey
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 304
Get Book
Book Description
In the long shadows cast by the Robert Bork and Clarence Thomas nominations, Supreme Court confirmations remain highly contentious and controversial. This is due in part to the Senate's increasing reliance upon a much lengthier, much more public, and occasionally raucous confirmation process—in an effort to curb the potential excesses of executive power created by presidents seeking greater control over the Court's ideological composition. Michael Comiskey offers the most comprehensive, systematic, and optimistic analysis of that process to date. Arguing that the process works well and therefore should not be significantly altered, Comiskey convincingly counters those critics who view highly contentious confirmation proceedings as the norm. Senators have every right and a real obligation, he contends, to scrutinize the nominees' constitutional philosophies. He further argues that the media coverage of the Senate's deliberations has worked to improve the level of such scrutiny and that recent presidents have neither exerted excessive influence on the appointment process nor created a politically extreme Court. He also examines the ongoing concern over presidential efforts to pack the court, concluding that stacking the ideological deck is unlikely. As an exception to the rule, Comiskey analyzes in depth the Thomas confirmation to explain why it was an aberration, offering the most detailed account yet of Thomas's pre-judicial professional and political activities. He argues that the Senate Judiciary Committee abdicated its responsibilities out of deference to Thomas's race. Another of the book's unique features is Comiskey's reassessment of the reputations of twentieth-century Supreme Court justices. Based on a survey of nearly 300 scholars in constitutional law and politics, it shows that the modern confirmation process continues to fill Court vacancies with jurists as capable as those of earlier eras. We have now seen the longest period without a turnover on the Court since the early nineteenth century, making inevitable the appointment of several new justices following the 2004 presidential election. Thus, the timing of the publication of Seeking Justices could not be more propitious.
