Author: Jeffrey R. Casterella
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 34
Get Book Here
Book Description
This paper examines the association between audit-firm characteristics and audit-related litigation risk. Previous litigation risk studies have been limited to examining audit-client characteristics, as audit-firm data has generally been unavailable, or available only for a very small set of homogeneous firms (e.g., the Big 4). Using data from an insurance company specializing in providing professional liability insurance to a wide range of accounting firms, we develop and test a model of litigation risk that includes audit-firm characteristics likely to be related to audit failure and/or litigation: firm expertise, audit-process quality/consistency, compliance with professional standards, and general attitudes regarding independence and risk. We find evidence that four of these five characteristics are associated with litigation risk. We also find that firm size, litigation history, and jurisdiction are strongly associated with audit-related litigation risk.
Author: Kevin M. Raedy
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 129
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Dana Roger Hermanson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 246
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher: ScholarlyEditions
ISBN: 1464966974
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 317
Get Book Here
Book Description
Issues in Accounting, Administration, and Corporate Governance: 2011 Edition is a ScholarlyEditions™ eBook that delivers timely, authoritative, and comprehensive information about Accounting, Administration, and Corporate Governance. The editors have built Issues in Accounting, Administration, and Corporate Governance: 2011 Edition on the vast information databases of ScholarlyNews.™ You can expect the information about Accounting, Administration, and Corporate Governance in this eBook to be deeper than what you can access anywhere else, as well as consistently reliable, authoritative, informed, and relevant. The content of Issues in Accounting, Administration, and Corporate Governance: 2011 Edition has been produced by the world’s leading scientists, engineers, analysts, research institutions, and companies. All of the content is from peer-reviewed sources, and all of it is written, assembled, and edited by the editors at ScholarlyEditions™ and available exclusively from us. You now have a source you can cite with authority, confidence, and credibility. More information is available at http://www.ScholarlyEditions.com/.
Author: Joginderpal Singh Kundi
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Auditing
Languages : en
Pages : 278
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Edgar Kent St. Pierre
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 144
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Paul J. Beck
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 61
Get Book Here
Book Description
Using D&O insurance premia from the 2001-2004 Tillinghast D&O insurance surveys as a proxy for litigation risk, we show that audit fees are positively associated with litigation risk even after controlling for several quantitative risk factors known to influence both the insurance premium and audit fee. We attribute this positive association to the parallel development of risk assessment expertise by both D&O insurers and auditors and to their overlapping sources of qualitative risk information. The significant association between D&O premia and audit fees also provides external validation for the auditor's risk assessment process. Finally, we partition accounting firms based on their audit methodologies and find that the audit fees charged by risk-based auditors are more strongly associated with litigation risk than those charged by firms using more traditional audit approaches.
Author: Ananth Seetharaman
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 25
Get Book Here
Book Description
This study re-examines the relationship between litigation risk and audit pricing. Two necessary ingredients to empirically examine this relationship are (a) a litigious legal environment, and (b) publicly disclosed auditor remuneration. Prior studies have not been able to comprehensively examine this relationship because the most litigious country in the world, the U.S., does not require auditor remuneration to be publicly disclosed. Conversely, countries that require companies to disclose auditor remuneration in their financial statements (e.g., Hong Kong, Australia, and the UK) typically have a relatively benign litigation environment. In this study, we straddle publicly disclosed auditor remuneration and a highly litigious environment by focusing on UK firms cross-listed on U.S. stock exchanges. We find that, after controlling for other factors, UK firms tend to charge higher fees for their services when their clients are cross-listed on major U.S. stock exchanges. We, however, find no evidence of higher audit fees when UK firms cross-list on non-U.S. foreign exchanges. These findings are consistent with the prediction that audit fees will reflect risk differences across liability regimes.
Author: Christiane Strohm
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 3835091158
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 247
Get Book Here
Book Description
Christiane Strohm investigates the effects of the Sarbanes-Oxley-Act and the revised 8th EU-Directive on auditing. She shows that there is a difference in the communication and safeguarding effects of a regulation, depending on the precision of its wording and that safeguarding effects also depend on auditors' monetary incentives and on perceived costs of litigation.
Author: Jayanthi Krishnan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Litigation against auditors has increased dramatically in recent years. Auditors can offset litigation risk in a number of ways, including improved audit quality and planning, increases in audit fees and increases in the issuance of modified opinions. Auditors can also adjust their client portfolios by becoming more selective in their choice of new clients and by withdrawing from high-risk engagements. We test the hypothesis that litigation risk motivates auditor resignations by comparing resignation companies with two groups of client companies that dismissed their auditors: one matched with the resignation companies on industry and year, and the other matched on year alone. We find resignation companies differ from dismissal companies along dimensions that capture the probability of litigation: financial distress, variance of abnormal returns, auditor independence, tenure and a modified (particularly going-concern) opinion. We also construct a litigation proxy based on a prior litigation-prediction model and find that the proxy is positively associated with the probability that the auditor will resign rather than be dismissed from the engagement. Our analysis is consistent with concerns expressed by the accounting profession that litigation pressures lead to the withdrawal of audit services for a segment of the market.
