Leading Court Decisions Pertinent to Public School Desegregation

Leading Court Decisions Pertinent to Public School Desegregation PDF Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Segregation in education
Languages : en
Pages : 188

Get Book Here

Book Description

Leading Court Decisions Pertinent to Public School Desegregation

Leading Court Decisions Pertinent to Public School Desegregation PDF Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Segregation in education
Languages : en
Pages : 188

Get Book Here

Book Description


Leading Court Decisions Pertinent to Public School Desegregation

Leading Court Decisions Pertinent to Public School Desegregation PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description


Leading Court Decisions Pertinent to Public School Desegregation, 92Nd Congress, 2Nd Session, 1972

Leading Court Decisions Pertinent to Public School Desegregation, 92Nd Congress, 2Nd Session, 1972 PDF Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 200

Get Book Here

Book Description


Brown v. Board of Education

Brown v. Board of Education PDF Author: James T. Patterson
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0199880840
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 318

Get Book Here

Book Description
2004 marks the fiftieth anniversary of the Supreme Court's unanimous decision to end segregation in public schools. Many people were elated when Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren delivered Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka in May 1954, the ruling that struck down state-sponsored racial segregation in America's public schools. Thurgood Marshall, chief attorney for the black families that launched the litigation, exclaimed later, "I was so happy, I was numb." The novelist Ralph Ellison wrote, "another battle of the Civil War has been won. The rest is up to us and I'm very glad. What a wonderful world of possibilities are unfolded for the children!" Here, in a concise, moving narrative, Bancroft Prize-winning historian James T. Patterson takes readers through the dramatic case and its fifty-year aftermath. A wide range of characters animates the story, from the little-known African Americans who dared to challenge Jim Crow with lawsuits (at great personal cost); to Thurgood Marshall, who later became a Justice himself; to Earl Warren, who shepherded a fractured Court to a unanimous decision. Others include segregationist politicians like Governor Orval Faubus of Arkansas; Presidents Eisenhower, Johnson, and Nixon; and controversial Supreme Court justices such as William Rehnquist and Clarence Thomas. Most Americans still see Brown as a triumph--but was it? Patterson shrewdly explores the provocative questions that still swirl around the case. Could the Court--or President Eisenhower--have done more to ensure compliance with Brown? Did the decision touch off the modern civil rights movement? How useful are court-ordered busing and affirmative action against racial segregation? To what extent has racial mixing affected the academic achievement of black children? Where indeed do we go from here to realize the expectations of Marshall, Ellison, and others in 1954?

Understanding School Desegregation

Understanding School Desegregation PDF Author: United States Commission on Civil Rights
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Segregation in education
Languages : en
Pages : 24

Get Book Here

Book Description


Brown V. Board of Education

Brown V. Board of Education PDF Author: Tim McNeese
Publisher: Infobase Publishing
ISBN: 1438103328
Category : African Americans
Languages : en
Pages : 145

Get Book Here

Book Description
Today, integration is as much a part of America's public school system as Friday night football and complaints about cafeteria food. But America has not always opened the doors of its schools to all races. School integration occurred through the tireless efforts of countless men and women - some white, many black - who took their ideals and dreams about America and what it represents and worked to make them not only the law of the land, but acceptable to the vast majority of citizens. Here is the story of the relentless legal campaign launched by the NAACP civil rights organization and a persistent black lawyer named Thurgood Marshall, and how it changed history forever. Brown v. Board of Education was one of the most important Supreme Court decisions of the 20th century.

Social Science in Court

Social Science in Court PDF Author: Mark A. Chesler
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 314

Get Book Here

Book Description
The 1954 landmark school desegregation decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, Brown v. Board of Education, was part of one of the most extensive and tumultuous social/legal movements in the nation's history. The authors of this study employ the school desegregation movement to examine the role of social scientists, and social science, in the litigation process. Covering seventeen desegregation cases in litigation after 1970, they bring together the perspectives of judges, lawyers, and social scientists in a work sure to be of interest to all concerned with the court process, public policy, applied social science, conflict resolution, and the continuing process of school integration. The authors focus not only on the legal issues but also on the broader issues of conflict resolution, managed social change, and the public role of social science. They first provide a chronicle of the events leading up to the Brown case, and then a thorough and detailed analysis of the social science expert witnesses called upon to testify in the desegregation cases that followed. In the course of their research, they interviewed 90 scientists who appeared as witnesses, 70 lawyers who tried these cases for both plaintiff and defense groups, and 10 trial judges who presided in the cases. No other study has been so broadly encompassing, both in the number of cases and in the span of time involved.

Resources in Education

Resources in Education PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 1182

Get Book Here

Book Description


Research in Education

Research in Education PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 914

Get Book Here

Book Description


The Development of Law Pertaining to Desegregation of Public Schools in North Carolina

The Development of Law Pertaining to Desegregation of Public Schools in North Carolina PDF Author: Elton D. Winstead
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781497559127
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 230

Get Book Here

Book Description
The Development of Law Pertaining to Desegregation of Public Schools in North Carolina: Circumvention of the Supreme Court's 1954 Brown v. Board of Education Ruling for Ten Years in North Carolina Includes Interviews with Gov. Luther H. Hodges, Gov. Terry Sanford, Thomas J. Pearsall, William Medford, Conrad O. Pearson, James E. Miller, Larry I. Moore This book is the dissertation submitted to Duke University, Durham, North Carolina in 1966 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education by Elton D. "E. D." Winstead. The information in this book has historical significance and deserves to be more readily available as a contemporary perspective during that time period leading up to the desegregation of the North Carolina school system. A reflection on this perspective is especially appropriate now on the occasion of the 60th anniversary of the 1954 Supreme Court ruling in the Brown v. Board of Education case and on the occasion of the 50th anniversary of the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The 1964 Civil Rights Act basically ended North Carolina's Pearsall Plan, not only as a way to preserve the North Carolina school system, but also as a way to circumvent the Supreme Court ruling in the Brown v. Board of Education case. The Pearsall Plan, as the vehicle for the circumvention of the Brown decision, was declared to be unconstitutional by two federal courts in 1966 and 1969 after this study was completed, and two of the people interviewed in this study were instrumental in those cases. Some of the persons closest to, and most influential in shaping, North Carolina's official reaction to the 1954 Supreme Court decision in the Brown case were interviewed. A few selected quotes from the interviews: Question: The Report of the Supreme Court Decision of May 17, 1954 by the Institute of Government at Chapel Hill discussed the alternatives open to the State, and the alternatives appear to boil down to three possibilities; that is, as stated in the report, defiance, compliance, or to play for time, making haste slowly enough to avoid litigation, and yet make haste fast enough to come within the law; thereby keeping the peace and keeping the schools. I have simplified the third alternative by calling it what it appears to be – circumvention, which of course, means to go around, to gain advantage over by artfulness or stratagem. Do you agree that the three possibilities cover the alternatives available to North Carolina at the time? Mr. Conrad O. Pearson (General Counsel, NAACP for North Carolina): “Yes, and North Carolina followed the alternative offered by circumvention.” Mr. Conrad O. Pearson: “The committee [The Special Advisory Committee appointed by the Governor] took a negative approach. They made no effort to influence public opinion toward compliance with the Court's decision.” Gov. Luther H. Hodges: “I did not practice circumvention. We did make an effort to play for time.” Question: Did the committee [Special Advisory Committee, chaired by you] ever seriously consider immediate desegregation as a possible solution? Dr. Thomas J. Pearsall: “No.” Mr. Larry I. Moore:“The Pearsall Plan made possible a more orderly transition.” “At that time, if North Carolina had integrated the schools in proportion to population ratios, the school system would have been destroyed and there would have been riots. The people would not have accepted integration.” The modern reader will notice that word choice has changed since 1966, when the word “Negro” was standard terminology, for example, as used by Mr. Conrad O. Pearson, the General Counsel for the North Carolina NAACP in his interview published in the appendix of this book. Ray L. Winstead Editor