Author: Lara Scaglia
Publisher: Peter Lang Gmbh, Internationaler Verlag Der Wissenschaften
ISBN: 9783631804384
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 294
Get Book Here
Book Description
The book provides a critical and historical inquiry into Kant's schematism chapter. It focuses on the meanings of the notion of schema before Kant, the precritical meaning of this notion, an analysis of the schematism chapter and its criticisms, and an overview of the legacy of Kant's schematism in philosophy and psychology.
Author: Lara Scaglia
Publisher:
ISBN: 9788449083594
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 256
Get Book Here
Book Description
La presente tesis doctoral,titulada Kant's notion of a transcendental schema: the constitution of objective knowledge between epistemology and psychology, pretende entender y evaluar histórica y críticamente la función del capítulo de Kant sobre el esquematismo transcendental. He decidido dedicar mi trabajo a la noción del esquema por varias razones. En primer lugar, aunque varios críticos niegan su importancia y sugieren que el esquematismo es un capítulo redundante e innecesario en la Crítica de la Razón Pura, yo creo que lo más conveniente estratarde descubrir si Kant atribuyeuna función a este capítulo. En segundo lugar, el problema del esquematismo, o sea la aparente imposibilidad de la aplicación de conceptos puros a las intuiciones, necesita ser clarificado. Si la filosofía de Kant, en sentido crítico, debe aclarar los problemas, el esquematismo es su parte fundamental, puesse ocupa exactamente de la cuestión de como mediar la distinción entre los aspectos intelectual y sensible en la cognición. En tercer lugar, creo que es importante examinar la historia de los términos filosóficos: a menudo los filósofos usantérminos que provienen de diferentes campos de la práctica o del saber humano y atribuyen a estos términos nuevos significadosacorde a las cuestiones que pretenden resolver, creando, así, un lenguaje técnico. Kant atribuye a 'esquema' (término usadocon anterioridadsobretodo en la retórica, la lógica y la psicología) un significado determinado,y usa esa noción para indicar (que se trata de) un método parecido a la construcción en matemática. Finalmente, si la filosofía se considera desde un punto de vista crítico, como una meta-investigación sobre las condiciones de posibilidad de las varias disciplinas, entonces el caso del esquematismo es un ejemplo interesante de las dificultades e importancia de discriminar entre los varios ámbitos del conocimiento: unas interpretaciones (interpretan/tratan) el esquematismo como un tema propio de la psicología más que de la filosofía, y Kant mismo (usa con soltura, se desenvuelve en el uso de) una terminología psicológica en el capítulo. Si es así, cual es la relación entre filosofía y psicología? El presente trabajo consta de dos partes principales. En la primera, el primer capítulo se focaliza en los significados de 'esquema' (según) los filósofos antecedentes a Kant,y el segundo, en las óperas precríticas. El tercero introduce el lector a los capítulos que preceden el esquematismo en la Crítica de la Razón Pura,o sea la "Analítica Transcendental" y la "Deducción Transcendental"; el cuarto capítulo analiza el contenido del capítulo de Kant sobre el esquematismo, mientras que el quinto considera unas de las mayores criticas dirigidas a la doctrina de Kant con el fin de determinar la función de estecapítulo tan controvertido. En la segunda parte, el primer capítulo presenta una panorámica general de la herencia filosófica del esquematismo de Kant, teniendo en particular cuenta las (percepciones/interpretaciones/obras/ideas?) de los idealistas, los post Kantianos y los mayores filósofos del tardío siglo XIX e inicios del siglo XX, como Bergson, Husserl, Heidegger y Horkheimer. El segundo capítulo se centra en la distinción de Kant entre filosofía (en la que el esquema asume un valor sistemático de gran importancia) y psicología, y además considera la interpretación de Kitcher de la doctrina de Kant como psicología transcendental. El tercero y último capítulo considera la herencia psicológica delesquematismo de Kant, presentando las teorías delesquema en Piaget, Bartlett y Barsalou.
Author: Young Ahn Kang
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Schematism
Languages : en
Pages : 208
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Yaron M. Senderowicz
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 1402025815
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 302
Get Book Here
Book Description
1. Introduction Kant considered the doctrine of transcendental idealism an indisp- sable part of the theory of knowledge presented in the Critique of Pure Reason. My aim in this book is to present a new defense of the coh- ence and plausibility of Kant’s transcendental idealism and its indisp- sability for his theory of knowledge. I will show that the main argument of the Transcendental Aesthetic and the Transcendental Analytic is - fensible independently of some of Kant’s claims which are said to threaten its coherence. I have undertaken an inquiry into the coherence of Kant’s transc- dental idealism for the following reasons. A defense of the coherence of transcendental idealism is required by the existing state of Kantian scholarship. The claim that Kant’s transcendental idealism is incoh- ent has appeared in various forms over the last two centuries. The most powerful and elaborate criticism of Kant’s transcendental idealism is found in Part Four of Strawson’s The Bounds of Sense. Several comm- tators have tried to reestablish its coherence. Although Allison and other commentators have contributed ideas that are valuable for an 1 account of the coherence of Kant’s transcendental idealism, their - guments fall short as a response to the standard objection. Indeed, the claim that Kant’s transcendental idealism is incoherent continues to be the view held by most thinkers. I have limited my goal in this book to establishing the coherence of Kant’s transcendental idealism due to two related reasons.
Author: Béatrice Longuenesse
Publisher: Princeton University Press
ISBN: 0691214123
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 438
Get Book Here
Book Description
Kant claims to have established his table of categories or "pure concepts of the understanding" according to the "guiding thread" provided by logical forms of judgment. By drawing extensively on Kant's logical writings, Béatrice Longuenesse analyzes this controversial claim, and then follows the thread through its continuation in the transcendental deduction of the categories, the transcendental schemata, and the principles of pure understanding. The result is a systematic, persuasive new interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason. Longuenesse shows that although Kant adopts his inventory of the forms of judgment from logic textbooks of his time, he is nevertheless original in selecting just those forms he holds to be indispensable to our ability to relate representations to objects. Kant gives formal representation to this relation between conceptual thought and its objects by introducing the term "x" into his analysis of logical forms to stand for the object that is "thought under" the concepts that are combined in judgment. This "x" plays no role in Kant's forms of logical inference, but instead plays a role in clarifying the relation between logical forms (forms of concept subordination) and combinations ("syntheses") of perceptual data, necessary for empirical cognition. Considering Kant's logical forms of judgment thus helps illuminate crucial aspects of the Transcendental Analytic as a whole, while revealing the systematic unity between Kant's theory of judgment in the first Critique and his analysis of "merely reflective" (aesthetic and teleological) judgments in the third Critique.
Author: Konstantin Pollok
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1107127807
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 343
Get Book Here
Book Description
A milestone in Kant scholarship, this interpretation of his critical philosophy makes sense of his notorious 'synthetic judgments a priori'.
Author: Sorin Baiasu
Publisher: Springer
ISBN: 1137454539
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 267
Get Book Here
Book Description
For a long time, commentators viewed Sartre as one of Kant's significant twentieth-century critics. Recent research of their philosophies has discovered that Sartre's relation to Kant's work manifests an 'anxiety of influence', which masks more profound similarities. This volume of newly written comparative essays is the first edited collection on the philosophies of Kant and Sartre. The volume focuses on issues in metaphysics, metaethics and metaphilosophy, and explores the similarities and differences between the two authors, as well as the complementarity of some of their views, particularly on autonomy, happiness, self-consciousness, evil, temporality, imagination and the nature of philosophy.
Author: Henry E. Allison
Publisher: Yale University Press
ISBN: 9780300102666
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 564
Get Book Here
Book Description
This landmark book is now reissued in a rewritten & updated edition that takes account of recent Kantian literature. It includes a new discussion of the 'Third Analogy', an expanded discussion of Kant's 'Paralogisms' & new chapters on Kant's theory of reason, theology & the 'Appendix to the Dialectic'.
Author: Robert Greenberg
Publisher: Penn State Press
ISBN: 0271040475
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 294
Get Book Here
Book Description
The prevailing interpretation of Kant’s First Critique in Anglo-American philosophy views his theory of a priori knowledge as basically a theory about the possibility of empirical knowledge (or experience), or the a priori conditions for that possibility (the representations of space and time and the categories). Instead, Robert Greenberg argues that Kant is more fundamentally concerned with the possibility of a priori knowledge—the very possibility of the possibility of empirical knowledge in the first place. Greenberg advances four central theses:(1) the Critique is primarily concerned about the possibility, or relation to objects, of a priori, not empirical knowledge, and Kant’s theory of that possibility is defensible; (2) Kant’s transcendental ontology must be distinct from the conditions of the possibility of a priori knowledge; (3) the functions of judgment, in Kant’s discussion of the Table of Judgments, should be seen according to his transcendental logic as having content, not as being just logical forms of judgment making; (4) Kant’s distinction between and connection of ordering relations (Verhaltnisse) and reference relations (Beziehungen) have to be kept in mind to avoid misunderstanding the Critique. At every step of the way Greenberg contrasts his view with the major interpretations of Kant by commentators like Henry Allison, Jonathan Bennett, Paul Guyer, and Peter Strawson. Not only does this new approach to Kant present a strong challenge to these dominant interpretations, but by being more true to Kant’s own intent it holds promise for making better sense out of what have been seen as the First Critique’s discordant themes.
Author: Moltke S. Gram
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 216
Get Book Here
Book Description
