Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System

Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System PDF Author: Tara Smith
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1107114497
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 303

Get Book Here

Book Description
This book grounds judicial review in its deepest foundations: the function, authority, and objectivity of a legal system as a whole.

Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System

Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System PDF Author: Tara Smith
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1107114497
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 303

Get Book Here

Book Description
This book grounds judicial review in its deepest foundations: the function, authority, and objectivity of a legal system as a whole.

A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review

A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review PDF Author: W. J. Waluchow
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1139462814
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 7

Get Book Here

Book Description
In this study, W. J. Waluchow argues that debates between defenders and critics of constitutional bills of rights presuppose that constitutions are more or less rigid entities. Within such a conception, constitutions aspire to establish stable, fixed points of agreement and pre-commitment, which defenders consider to be possible and desirable, while critics deem impossible and undesirable. Drawing on reflections about the nature of law, constitutions, the common law, and what it is to be a democratic representative, Waluchow urges a different theory of bills of rights that is flexible and adaptable. Adopting such a theory enables one not only to answer to critics' most serious challenges, but also to appreciate the role that a bill of rights, interpreted and enforced by unelected judges, can sensibly play in a constitutional democracy.

Judicial Review in Norway

Judicial Review in Norway PDF Author: Anine Kierulf
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1108648649
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 326

Get Book Here

Book Description
Outside the United States, Norway's 1814 constitution is the oldest still in force. Constitutional judicial review has been a part of Norwegian court decision-making for most of these 200 years. Since the 1990s, Norway has also exercised review under the European Convention of Human Rights. Judicial review of legislation can be controversial: having unelected judges overruling popularly elected majorities seems undemocratic. Yet Norway remains one of the most democratic countries in the world. How does Norway manage the balance between democracy and judicial oversight? Author Anine Kierulf tells the story of Norwegian constitutionalism from 1814 until today through the lens of judicial review debates and cases. This study adds important insights into the social and political justifications for an active judicial review component in a constitutional democracy. Anine Kierulf argues that the Norwegian model of judicial review provides a useful perspective on the dichotomy of American and European constitutionalism.

The Rise of Modern Judicial Review

The Rise of Modern Judicial Review PDF Author: Christopher Wolfe
Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield
ISBN: 9780822630265
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 472

Get Book Here

Book Description
This major history of judicial review, revised to include the Rehnquist court, shows how modern courts have used their power to create new "rights with fateful political consequences." Originally published by Basic Books.

Judicial Politics in Mexico

Judicial Politics in Mexico PDF Author: Andrea Castagnola
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1315520591
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 208

Get Book Here

Book Description
After more than seventy years of uninterrupted authoritarian government headed by the Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI), Mexico formally began the transition to democracy in 2000. Unlike most other new democracies in Latin America, no special Constitutional Court was set up, nor was there any designated bench of the Supreme Court for constitutional adjudication. Instead, the judiciary saw its powers expand incrementally. Under this new context inevitable questions emerged: How have the justices interpreted the constitution? What is the relation of the court with the other political institutions? How much autonomy do justices display in their decisions? Has the court considered the necessary adjustments to face the challenges of democracy? It has become essential in studying the new role of the Supreme Court to obtain a more accurate and detailed diagnosis of the performances of its justices in this new political environment. Through critical review of relevant debates and using original data sets to empirically analyze the way justices voted on the three main means of constitutional control from 2000 through 2011, leading legal scholars provide a thoughtful and much needed new interpretation of the role the judiciary plays in a country’s transition to democracy This book is designed for graduate courses in law and courts, judicial politics, comparative judicial politics, Latin American institutions, and transitions to democracy. This book will equip scholars and students with the knowledge required to understand the importance of the independence of the judiciary in the transition to democracy.

Judging Statutes

Judging Statutes PDF Author: Robert A. Katzmann
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0199362149
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 184

Get Book Here

Book Description
In an ideal world, the laws of Congress--known as federal statutes--would always be clearly worded and easily understood by the judges tasked with interpreting them. But many laws feature ambiguous or even contradictory wording. How, then, should judges divine their meaning? Should they stick only to the text? To what degree, if any, should they consult aids beyond the statutes themselves? Are the purposes of lawmakers in writing law relevant? Some judges, such as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, believe courts should look to the language of the statute and virtually nothing else. Chief Judge Robert A. Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit respectfully disagrees. In Judging Statutes, Katzmann, who is a trained political scientist as well as a judge, argues that our constitutional system charges Congress with enacting laws; therefore, how Congress makes its purposes known through both the laws themselves and reliable accompanying materials should be respected. He looks at how the American government works, including how laws come to be and how various agencies construe legislation. He then explains the judicial process of interpreting and applying these laws through the demonstration of two interpretative approaches, purposivism (focusing on the purpose of a law) and textualism (focusing solely on the text of the written law). Katzmann draws from his experience to show how this process plays out in the real world, and concludes with some suggestions to promote understanding between the courts and Congress. When courts interpret the laws of Congress, they should be mindful of how Congress actually functions, how lawmakers signal the meaning of statutes, and what those legislators expect of courts construing their laws. The legislative record behind a law is in truth part of its foundation, and therefore merits consideration.

Constitutional Courts in Asia

Constitutional Courts in Asia PDF Author: Hongyi Chen
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 110719508X
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 407

Get Book Here

Book Description
A comparative, systematic and critical analysis of constitutional courts and constitutional review in Asia.

Comparative Judicial Review

Comparative Judicial Review PDF Author: Erin F. Delaney
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
ISBN: 1788110609
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 463

Get Book Here

Book Description
Constitutional courts around the world play an increasingly central role in day-to-day democratic governance. Yet scholars have only recently begun to develop the interdisciplinary analysis needed to understand this shift in the relationship of constitutional law to politics. This edited volume brings together the leading scholars of constitutional law and politics to provide a comprehensive overview of judicial review, covering theories of its creation, mechanisms of its constraint, and its comparative applications, including theories of interpretation and doctrinal developments. This book serves as a single point of entry for legal scholars and practitioners interested in understanding the field of comparative judicial review in its broader political and social context.

The People Themselves

The People Themselves PDF Author: Larry Kramer
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
ISBN: 9780195306453
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 380

Get Book Here

Book Description
This book makes the radical claim that rather than interpreting the Constitution from on high, the Court should be reflecting popular will--or the wishes of the people themselves.

Judicial Review Systems in West Africa: a Comparative Analysis

Judicial Review Systems in West Africa: a Comparative Analysis PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789176710524
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 180

Get Book Here

Book Description
This book compares the constitutional justice institutions in 16 West African states and analyses the diverse ways in which these institutions render justice and promote democratic development. There is no single best approach: different legal traditions tend to produce different design options. It also seeks to facilitate mutual learning and understanding among countries in the region, especially those with different legal systems, in efforts to frame a common West African system. The authors analyse a broad spectrum of issues related to constitutional justice institutions in West Africa. While navigating technical issues such as competence, composition, access, the status of judges, the authoritative power of these institutions and their relationship with other institutions, they also take a novel look at analogous institutions in pre-colonial Africa with similar functions, as well as the often-taboo subject of the control and accountability of these institutions.