Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System

Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System PDF Author: Tara Smith
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1107114497
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 303

Get Book

Book Description
This book grounds judicial review in its deepest foundations: the function, authority, and objectivity of a legal system as a whole.

Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System

Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System PDF Author: Tara Smith
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1316404730
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 303

Get Book

Book Description
How should courts interpret the law? While all agree that courts must be objective, people differ sharply over what this demands in practice: fidelity to the text? To the will of the people? To certain moral ideals? In Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System, Tara Smith breaks through the false dichotomies inherent in dominant theories - various forms of originalism, living constitutionalism, and minimalism - to present a new approach to judicial review. She contends that we cannot assess judicial review in isolation from the larger enterprise of which it is a part. By providing careful clarification of both the function of the legal system as well as of objectivity itself, she produces a compelling, firmly grounded account of genuinely objective judicial review. Smith's innovative approach marks a welcome advance for anyone interested in legal objectivity and individual rights.

A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review

A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review PDF Author: W. J. Waluchow
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1139462814
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 7

Get Book

Book Description
In this study, W. J. Waluchow argues that debates between defenders and critics of constitutional bills of rights presuppose that constitutions are more or less rigid entities. Within such a conception, constitutions aspire to establish stable, fixed points of agreement and pre-commitment, which defenders consider to be possible and desirable, while critics deem impossible and undesirable. Drawing on reflections about the nature of law, constitutions, the common law, and what it is to be a democratic representative, Waluchow urges a different theory of bills of rights that is flexible and adaptable. Adopting such a theory enables one not only to answer to critics' most serious challenges, but also to appreciate the role that a bill of rights, interpreted and enforced by unelected judges, can sensibly play in a constitutional democracy.

The Doctrine of Judicial Review

The Doctrine of Judicial Review PDF Author: Edward Samuel Corwin
Publisher: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.
ISBN: 1584770112
Category : Constitutional history
Languages : en
Pages : 190

Get Book

Book Description
Five essays examine the concept of "judicial review" from a historical perspective. The term is defined as the power and duty of a court to disregard ultra vires legislative acts.

Judicial Review and Judicial Power in the Supreme Court

Judicial Review and Judicial Power in the Supreme Court PDF Author: Kermit L. Hall
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1135691460
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 503

Get Book

Book Description
Available as a single volume or as part of the 10 volume set Supreme Court in American Society

Comparative Judicial Review

Comparative Judicial Review PDF Author: Erin F. Delaney
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
ISBN: 1788110609
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 464

Get Book

Book Description
Constitutional courts around the world play an increasingly central role in day-to-day democratic governance. Yet scholars have only recently begun to develop the interdisciplinary analysis needed to understand this shift in the relationship of constitutional law to politics. This edited volume brings together the leading scholars of constitutional law and politics to provide a comprehensive overview of judicial review, covering theories of its creation, mechanisms of its constraint, and its comparative applications, including theories of interpretation and doctrinal developments. This book serves as a single point of entry for legal scholars and practitioners interested in understanding the field of comparative judicial review in its broader political and social context.

Judicial Review and the Law of the Constitution

Judicial Review and the Law of the Constitution PDF Author: Sylvia Snowiss
Publisher: Yale University Press
ISBN: 9780300046656
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 252

Get Book

Book Description
In this book, the author presents a new interpretation of the origin of judicial review. She traces the development of judicial review from American independence through the tenure of John Marshall as Chief Justice, showing that Marshall's role was far more innovative and decisive than has yet been recognized. According to the author all support for judicial review before Marshall contemplated a fundamentally different practice from that which we know today. Marshall did not simply reinforce or extend ideas already accepted but, in superficially minor and disguised ways, effected a radical transformation in the nature of the constitution and the judicial relationship to it.

Judicial Review in the Contemporary World

Judicial Review in the Contemporary World PDF Author: Mauro Cappelletti
Publisher: MICHIE
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 144

Get Book

Book Description


Judging Statutes

Judging Statutes PDF Author: Robert A. Katzmann
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0199362149
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 256

Get Book

Book Description
In an ideal world, the laws of Congress--known as federal statutes--would always be clearly worded and easily understood by the judges tasked with interpreting them. But many laws feature ambiguous or even contradictory wording. How, then, should judges divine their meaning? Should they stick only to the text? To what degree, if any, should they consult aids beyond the statutes themselves? Are the purposes of lawmakers in writing law relevant? Some judges, such as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, believe courts should look to the language of the statute and virtually nothing else. Chief Judge Robert A. Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit respectfully disagrees. In Judging Statutes, Katzmann, who is a trained political scientist as well as a judge, argues that our constitutional system charges Congress with enacting laws; therefore, how Congress makes its purposes known through both the laws themselves and reliable accompanying materials should be respected. He looks at how the American government works, including how laws come to be and how various agencies construe legislation. He then explains the judicial process of interpreting and applying these laws through the demonstration of two interpretative approaches, purposivism (focusing on the purpose of a law) and textualism (focusing solely on the text of the written law). Katzmann draws from his experience to show how this process plays out in the real world, and concludes with some suggestions to promote understanding between the courts and Congress. When courts interpret the laws of Congress, they should be mindful of how Congress actually functions, how lawmakers signal the meaning of statutes, and what those legislators expect of courts construing their laws. The legislative record behind a law is in truth part of its foundation, and therefore merits consideration.

Judicial Politics in Mexico

Judicial Politics in Mexico PDF Author: Andrea Castagnola
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1315520591
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 190

Get Book

Book Description
After more than seventy years of uninterrupted authoritarian government headed by the Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI), Mexico formally began the transition to democracy in 2000. Unlike most other new democracies in Latin America, no special Constitutional Court was set up, nor was there any designated bench of the Supreme Court for constitutional adjudication. Instead, the judiciary saw its powers expand incrementally. Under this new context inevitable questions emerged: How have the justices interpreted the constitution? What is the relation of the court with the other political institutions? How much autonomy do justices display in their decisions? Has the court considered the necessary adjustments to face the challenges of democracy? It has become essential in studying the new role of the Supreme Court to obtain a more accurate and detailed diagnosis of the performances of its justices in this new political environment. Through critical review of relevant debates and using original data sets to empirically analyze the way justices voted on the three main means of constitutional control from 2000 through 2011, leading legal scholars provide a thoughtful and much needed new interpretation of the role the judiciary plays in a country’s transition to democracy This book is designed for graduate courses in law and courts, judicial politics, comparative judicial politics, Latin American institutions, and transitions to democracy. This book will equip scholars and students with the knowledge required to understand the importance of the independence of the judiciary in the transition to democracy.