Author: Great Britain. Parliament. Joint Committee on Human Rights
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781801398381
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 26
Book Description
Human Rights Joint Committee 5th Report. Legislative Scrutiny
Author: Great Britain. Parliament. Joint Committee on Human Rights
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781801398381
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 26
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781801398381
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 26
Book Description
Government's Response to the Joint Committee on Human Rights Report : 'Legislative Scrutiny : National Security Bill'.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Human Rights Scrutiny Report
Author: Australia. Parliament. Joint Committee on Human Rights
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Human rights
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Human rights
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Human Rights Scrutiny Report
Author: Australia. Parliament. Joint Committee on Human Rights
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 25
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 25
Book Description
Human Rights Joint Committee 3rd Report. Legislative Scrutiny
Author: Great Britain. Parliament. Joint Committee on Human Rights
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 42
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 42
Book Description
Legislative Scrutiny
Author: Great Britain: Parliament: Joint Committee on Human Rights
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780104010570
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 26
Book Description
In this report the Committee draws attention to some human rights compatibility concerns to which the Serious Crime Bill gives rise. The main purpose of the Bill is to introduce Serious Crime Prevention Orders (SCPOs), empowering courts to impose a wide range of prohibitions or requirements in order to prevent harm from serious crime. The Committee see three significant human rights issues: (1) whether SCPOs amount to the determination of a criminal charge for the purposes of a right to a fair trial in article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights; (2) whether the standard of proof in proceedings for an SCPO should be the civil or the criminal standard; (3) whether the power to make SCPOs is defined with sufficient precision to satisfy the requirement that interferences with Convention rights be 'in accordance with the law' or 'prescribed by law'. The Committee believes most applications for an SCPO are likely to amount to the determination of a criminal charge. Consequently, proceedings should use the criminal standard of proof, not the civil one proposed by the Government, and the Committee recommends the Bill be amended. On the final issue, the Committee wants amendments in order to provide the requisite degree of legal certainty.
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780104010570
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 26
Book Description
In this report the Committee draws attention to some human rights compatibility concerns to which the Serious Crime Bill gives rise. The main purpose of the Bill is to introduce Serious Crime Prevention Orders (SCPOs), empowering courts to impose a wide range of prohibitions or requirements in order to prevent harm from serious crime. The Committee see three significant human rights issues: (1) whether SCPOs amount to the determination of a criminal charge for the purposes of a right to a fair trial in article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights; (2) whether the standard of proof in proceedings for an SCPO should be the civil or the criminal standard; (3) whether the power to make SCPOs is defined with sufficient precision to satisfy the requirement that interferences with Convention rights be 'in accordance with the law' or 'prescribed by law'. The Committee believes most applications for an SCPO are likely to amount to the determination of a criminal charge. Consequently, proceedings should use the criminal standard of proof, not the civil one proposed by the Government, and the Committee recommends the Bill be amended. On the final issue, the Committee wants amendments in order to provide the requisite degree of legal certainty.
Human Rights Scrutiny Report
Author: Australia. Parliament. Senate. Joint Committee on Human Rights
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 176
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 176
Book Description
Human Rights Scrutiny Report
Author: Australia. Parliament. Joint Committee on Human Rights
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 44
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 44
Book Description
Human Rights Scrutiny Report
Author: Australia. Parliament. Joint Committee on Human Rights
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 36
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 36
Book Description
Legislative Scrutiny
Author: Great Britain. Parliament. Joint Committee on Human Rights
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780104010754
Category : Bills, Legislative
Languages : en
Pages : 53
Book Description
The Committee examine the human rights implications of all government and private bills. This, the seventh progress report of the session, recommends changes to the Mental Health Bill and records the view that the Rating (Empty Properties) Bill raises no human rights issues. The Mental Health Bill was reported upon at an earlier stage (HLP 40/HC 288 2006-07). This report is a response to the Government reply and points arising in debate in the Commons.
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780104010754
Category : Bills, Legislative
Languages : en
Pages : 53
Book Description
The Committee examine the human rights implications of all government and private bills. This, the seventh progress report of the session, recommends changes to the Mental Health Bill and records the view that the Rating (Empty Properties) Bill raises no human rights issues. The Mental Health Bill was reported upon at an earlier stage (HLP 40/HC 288 2006-07). This report is a response to the Government reply and points arising in debate in the Commons.