How to Handle a Tax Controversy at the IRS and in Court After the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download How to Handle a Tax Controversy at the IRS and in Court After the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 PDF full book. Access full book title How to Handle a Tax Controversy at the IRS and in Court After the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 by American Bar Association. Section of Taxation. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: American Bar Association. Section of Taxation
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Tax collection
Languages : en
Pages : 437
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: American Bar Association. Section of Taxation
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Tax collection
Languages : en
Pages : 437
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: American Bar Association. Section of Taxation
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Tax courts
Languages : en
Pages : 558
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Theodore M. David
Publisher: American Law Institute-American Bar Association(ALI-ABA)
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 550
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Tax courts
Languages : en
Pages : 788
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Ira L. Shafiroff
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 992
Get Book Here
Book Description
Unless you have worked for the IRS, it's pretty hard to get a handle on the inner workings of this massive governmental agency and use that information to most effectively represent your clients. The new third edition of the Internal Revenue Service Practice & Procedure Deskbook -- written by a former IRS Tax Examiner - puts valuable insider tips to work for you, offering proven techniques and practice-oriented advice for resolving IRS disputes. Now published in an easy-to-use looseleaf format, the new edition of the Deskbook is fully updated to reflect and analyse the numerous changes in federal tax procedure, including analysis of the IRS Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998, Taxpayer Bill of Rights 2 and 3, and the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997. In addition, Internal Revenue Service Practice & Procedure Deskbook contains a substantial appendix which includes sample forms and letters (such as sample protest letters to the Appeals Office and a model Tax Court petition) as well as the official IRS Audit Handbook.
Author: Leandra Lederman
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 922
Get Book Here
Book Description
This casebook is designed both to assist students in learning the nuts & bolts of tax procedure, & to stimulate them to think about the broader issues that underlie its structural framework. In order to achieve these goals, each chapter includes theory questions & a set of fact-based problems that assist students in learning to think strategically, & to apply the law to situations they might encounter in practice. TeacherÆs Manual available.
Author: United States. Internal Revenue Service
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Tax collection
Languages : en
Pages : 4
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Del Wright Jr.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 71
Get Book Here
Book Description
For the past seventeen years, the Internal Revenue Service (Service) and the U.S. Tax Court (Tax Court) have unfairly penalized unrepresented taxpayers by ignoring Congressional safeguards in reaction to widely reported Service abuses. Those safeguards were enacted when Congress passed the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act in 1998 (IRS Reform Act). While the IRS Reform Act stopped many of the more egregious abuses, it has thus far failed to provide the meaningful penalty protections Congress sought.Prior to passage of the IRS Reform Act, the Service routinely imposed tax penalties without indicating to taxpayers either the statutory basis for the penalty or how the penalty was calculated. In addition, many lower-tiered Service examiners assessed penalties against taxpayers without any supervisory approval, which led to the widespread belief that either the Service was penalizing taxpayers indiscriminately, or using the penalty to strengthen its negotiating position with taxpayers. In the time leading up to enactment, the Senate noted protections were needed because “taxpayers are entitled to an explanation of the penalties imposed upon them . . . [and] penalties should only be imposed where appropriate and not as a bargaining chip.”The IRS Reform Act was intended to balance the playing field between the Service and taxpayers. To meet those goals, the IRS Reform Act added three new provision in two new sections of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) requiring the Service to: (1) include detailed information about the basis for penalties, as well as the penalty calculations, (2) have supervisors approve, in writing, all discretionary penalties, and (3) bear the burden of production with respect to tax penalties in court proceedings.While the Service has generally met the first provision, it has routinely avoided the second and ignored the third. Although the second requirement requires supervisory approval of non-discretionary penalties, the Service fails to provide taxpayers with any proof that such approval was obtained, and, in at least two recent cases discussed herein, has argued that taxpayers have no redress if such approval was not obtained. In addition, the Service has chosen to narrow the definition of discretionary penalties in order to avoid the law.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Tax courts
Languages : en
Pages : 1054
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Janene R. Finley
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Taxation
Languages : en
Pages : 444
Get Book Here
Book Description
Tax collectors have been burdened with bad reputations throughout the centuries, and the Internal Revenue Service is no exception. After reports of abuses towards taxpayers by the IRS, Congress passed the Internal Revenue Service Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998. The Act included a shift in the burden of proof in tax cases from the taxpayer to the IRS under certain conditions and went into effect on July 23, 1998. This study tested whether the shift in the burden of proof has affected the outcomes of tax cases in the U.S. Tax Court. The dataset included regular and memorandum decisions issued by the U.S. Tax Court for individual taxpayers between July 23, 1991, and July 22, 2005. A total of 2,450 cases were included in the dataset. The statistical analyses used include contingency tables, t -tests, multiple regression, and logistic regression. The results demonstrated that the average reduction in the amount of taxes that taxpayers owe is less after the change in the burden of proof than before the change. However, the results of the t -tests and regressions suggested that this difference was not significant. Congress had intended for the change in the burden of proof to assist taxpayers when they are litigating cases against the IRS. However, since there was an insignificant decrease in the reduction of the amounts owed by individual taxpayers, the results suggested that the legislation was not as helpful as was expected. The control variables for the type of case, attorney representation, and the judicial variables of eliteness of law school and undergraduate college, type of law school and undergraduate college, and prior governmental work experience had significant effects on the decisions in U.S. Tax Court cases. Concerns of those opposed to the change in the burden of proof were examined, including an increase in litigation and intrusiveness of the IRS during audits. Although the number of appeals by taxpayers increased, the number of examinations conducted by the IRS decreased. The results suggested that the changes did not have a significant effect on the outcomes in tax cases.
