Health Care, the Supreme Court and the Constitutionality of the Individual Mandate PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Health Care, the Supreme Court and the Constitutionality of the Individual Mandate PDF full book. Access full book title Health Care, the Supreme Court and the Constitutionality of the Individual Mandate by Remi Aston. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Remi Aston
Publisher: Nova Science Publishers
ISBN: 9781624171475
Category : Constitutional law
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
As part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), as amended, Congress enacted the "individual mandate", which requires certain individuals to have a minimum level of health insurance. Individuals who fail to do so may be subject to a monetary penalty, administered through the tax code. Prior to ACA, Congress had never required individuals to buy health insurance, and there had been significant debate over whether the individual mandate was within the scope of Congress's legislative powers. This book provides an overview of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care ACT (ACA), the Supreme Court and the constitutionality of the "individual mandate".
Author: Remi Aston
Publisher: Nova Science Publishers
ISBN: 9781624171475
Category : Constitutional law
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
As part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), as amended, Congress enacted the "individual mandate", which requires certain individuals to have a minimum level of health insurance. Individuals who fail to do so may be subject to a monetary penalty, administered through the tax code. Prior to ACA, Congress had never required individuals to buy health insurance, and there had been significant debate over whether the individual mandate was within the scope of Congress's legislative powers. This book provides an overview of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care ACT (ACA), the Supreme Court and the constitutionality of the "individual mandate".
Author: Nathaniel Persily
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
ISBN: 0199301050
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 401
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Supreme Court's decision in the Health Care Case, NFIB v. Sebelius, gripped the nation's attention during the spring of 2012. This volume gathers together reactions to the decision from an ideologically diverse selection of the nation's leading scholars of constitutional, administrative, and health law.
Author: T. R. Goldman
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 3
Get Book Here
Book Description
The US Supreme Court has agreed to rule on the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act of 2010. On November 14, 2011, the high court granted review of a decision from the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Atlanta, Georgia, that struck down the constitutionality of the individual mandate, which requires most people to have health insurance coverage or pay a penalty, but held that the rest of the Affordable Care Act could stand. Both the Obama administration and plaintiffs in the case had asked the Supreme Court to review the matter. The high court's decision is expected by the end of June 2012. In addition to reviewing the Eleventh Circuit's decision against the mandate, the Supreme Court will consider three other related matters: whether the individual mandate, if found unconstitutional, can be severed from the remainder of the health care law; whether consideration of the mandate is premature based on a federal law that bars court challenges to any tax until the tax is actually collected; and whether Congress exceeded its constitutional authority and was "coercive" toward the states in expanding Medicaid to enroll many of the nation's uninsured people. This brief provides background on these issues.
Author: Emily M. Bass
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Is President Obama's health-care law dead? Ever since the United States Supreme Court heard arguments about its constitutionality in late March, speculation has been rife that, at a minimum, the Justices will strike down the individual mandate. The predictions rest on a single assertion: that individuals have never before been required, under the authority of the Commerce Clause, to purchase a product or service from a private party. The assertion is mistaken. There is not only clear precedent for the mandate, but conservative, centrist and liberal Justices alike have embraced the precedent in principle. This includes nearly every member of the current Court, including the Chief Justice and, in order of seniority, Associate Justices Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer and Alito. It also includes former Chief Justice Rehnquist and other eminent Justices from the past. On the current Court, only Justices Sotomayor and Kagan have never had the opportunity to weigh in on the issue.
Author: Josh Blackman
Publisher: PublicAffairs
ISBN: 1610393295
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 354
Get Book Here
Book Description
Foreword by Randy E. Barnett In 2012, the United States Supreme Court became the center of the political world. In a dramatic and unexpected 5-4 decision, Chief Justice John Roberts voted on narrow grounds to save the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare. Unprecedented tells the inside story of how the challenge to Obamacare raced across all three branches of government, and narrowly avoided a constitutional collision between the Supreme Court and President Obama. On November 13, 2009, a group of Federalist Society lawyers met in the Mayflower Hotel in Washington, D.C., to devise a legal challenge to the constitutionality of President Obama's "legacy" -- his healthcare reform. It seemed a very long shot, and was dismissed peremptorily by the White House, much of Congress, most legal scholars, and all of the media. Two years later the fight to overturn the Affordable Care Act became a political and legal firestorm. When, finally, the Supreme Court announced its ruling, the judgment was so surprising that two cable news channels misreported it and announced that the Act had been declared unconstitutional. Unprecedented offers unrivaled inside access to how key decisions were made in Washington, based on interviews with over one hundred of the people who lived this journey -- including the academics who began the challenge, the attorneys who litigated the case at all levels, and Obama administration attorneys who successfully defended the law. It reads like a political thriller, provides the definitive account of how the Supreme Court almost struck down President Obama's "unprecedented" law, and explains what this decision means for the future of the Constitution, the limits on federal power, and the Supreme Court.
Author: Andrew Koppelman
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0199970025
Category : Health & Fitness
Languages : en
Pages : 195
Get Book Here
Book Description
Looks at Chief Justice John Roberts' upholding of "Obamacare," and shows how his decision was based on libertarian ideals and may not be a victory, but instead a blow, to progressives.
Author: Jack Painter
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Supreme Court is about to hear a case of great legal and political importance. At issue is the constitutionality of the so-called “individual mandate” in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which requires most Americans to purchase health insurance starting in 2014 or pay a monetary penalty.The question is whether Congress exceeded its Constitutional power to regulate “Commerce...among the several States” (i.e., regulate interstate commerce) and to make laws “necessary and proper” to carry into effect that power. It's unlikely the Obama Administration can justify the individual mandate as a regulation of interstate commerce. How can the failure to purchase health insurance in itself be considered commerce, let alone interstate commerce? If that is interstate commerce, what can't Congress force us to purchase? For that reason, the outcome of the case will likely turn on whether the individual mandate is both “necessary” and “proper” to carry into effect Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce. To succeed on the “necessary” test, the Obama Administration must make constitutional arguments that don't have any logical limits and therefore give Congress vast powers over our lives, and this undermines its ability to show that the individual mandate also meets the “proper” test, which requires that it be consistent with “the letter and spirit of the constitution.” On its face, the individual mandate fails the "proper" test. It abandons the long-standing legal principle that legally binding contracts require mutual assent and cannot be coerced. This crosses a line the federal government has never crossed and effectively tramples on “The powers...reserved...to the people” under the Tenth Amendment. It is inconsistent with the fundamental concept of self-ownership that underlies the theory of natural rights in the Declaration of Independence - the idea that we own ourselves and, therefore, have the right to be left alone as long as we honor the equal right of others to be left alone. Beyond that, the Administration's expansive view of the commerce power creates a sea of federal power limited only by islands of individual rights (and limits on using the commerce power to regulate non-economic activity), and that is inconsistent with the letter and spirit of the Constitution: It imposes virtually the same limits on federal and state power and, therefore, effectively gives the federal government the same “police powers” as the states. It puts liberty at risk by relying entirely on individual rights to protect us against things like mandated doctor visits and exercise. For example, the Supreme Court has found an unenumerated “right to liberty” only where there is no harm to others. The courts could easily decide that skipping annual physicals or living a sedentary life harms others by raising medical costs for some and insurance premiums for all. The Administration makes the following arguments to allay concerns about the threat to liberty its theories pose, but those arguments don't stand up to scrutiny: The government imposes the equivalent of mandates all the time. Economic mandates are no more intrusive than regulations or prohibitions of chosen activity. Congress can use its taxing power to achieve the same ends, so using the commerce power is permitted. We can rely on the political process to protect our liberty.
Author: Joan Biskupic
Publisher: Basic Books
ISBN: 0465093280
Category : Biography & Autobiography
Languages : en
Pages : 415
Get Book Here
Book Description
An incisive biography of the Supreme Court's enigmatic Chief Justice, taking us inside the momentous legal decisions of his tenure so far. John Roberts was named to the Supreme Court in 2005 claiming he would act as a neutral umpire in deciding cases. His critics argue he has been anything but, pointing to his conservative victories on voting rights and campaign finance. Yet he broke from orthodoxy in his decision to preserve Obamacare. How are we to understand the motives of the most powerful judge in the land? In The Chief, award-winning journalist Joan Biskupic contends that Roberts is torn between two, often divergent, priorities: to carry out a conservative agenda, and to protect the Court's image and his place in history. Biskupic shows how Roberts's dual commitments have fostered distrust among his colleagues, with major consequences for the law. Trenchant and authoritative, The Chief reveals the making of a justice and the drama on this nation's highest court.
Author: Matthew R. Hracho
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
On March 23, 2010, President Obama signed comprehensive health care legislation into law. Although historic, attorneys general from twelve states have filed suit against the federal government challenging the constitutionality of the bill. Specifically, the constitutional challenges focus on the individual health insurance mandate included in the bill. The mandate requires that all citizens have health insurance by 2014 or pay a fine. This Comment analyzes the congressional powers provided by the United States Constitution and the Supreme Court's interpretation of those powers to show why the individual health insurance mandate is unconstitutional.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 164
Get Book Here
Book Description
