Author: United States. Department of Energy. Office of Energy Technology
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Energy policy
Languages : en
Pages : 500
Book Description
Fossil Energy Research and Development Program of the U.S. Department of Energy
Author: United States. Department of Energy. Office of Energy Technology
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Energy policy
Languages : en
Pages : 500
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Energy policy
Languages : en
Pages : 500
Book Description
Fossil energy research and development program of the U.S. Department of Energy
Author: United Sttes Dept. of Energy
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Fossil fuels
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Fossil fuels
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Fossil Energy Research and Development Program of the U.S. Dept. of Energy
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Energy policy
Languages : en
Pages : 475
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Energy policy
Languages : en
Pages : 475
Book Description
Department of Energy's Fossil Energy Research and Development, and Clean Coal Technology Programs
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Subcommittee on Energy Research and Development
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Clean coal technologies
Languages : en
Pages : 260
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Clean coal technologies
Languages : en
Pages : 260
Book Description
Fossil Energy Research and Development Program of the U.S. Department of Energy, FY 1979
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) focuses energy Research and Development efforts on new and promising ways to provide for our future energy needs. This document focuses on DOE's programs and projects related to the nation's Fossil Energy resources: coal, oil, natural gas and oil shale. Fossil Energy programs have grown rapidly from about $58 million in FY 1973 to the $802 million requested for FY 1979. As those programs have matured, there have been significant shifts in emphasis. For example, by FY 1979, gasification technologies will have matured sufficiently to enter the demonstration phase. Then we will have to make critical decisions as to which candidate processes to pursue and to encourage industry's active participation as early as possible. We will present the rationale for those changes and others at the beginning of each section describing a particular grouping of similar projects, e.g., coal liquefaction. We will then discuss each project and present its current status along with past and future milestones. Emphasis is on projects with early payoff potential, particularly the direct utilization of coal. However, this near-term emphasis will not overshadow the need for a stong technological base for development of longer-term promising technologies and the need for a strong environmental concern.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) focuses energy Research and Development efforts on new and promising ways to provide for our future energy needs. This document focuses on DOE's programs and projects related to the nation's Fossil Energy resources: coal, oil, natural gas and oil shale. Fossil Energy programs have grown rapidly from about $58 million in FY 1973 to the $802 million requested for FY 1979. As those programs have matured, there have been significant shifts in emphasis. For example, by FY 1979, gasification technologies will have matured sufficiently to enter the demonstration phase. Then we will have to make critical decisions as to which candidate processes to pursue and to encourage industry's active participation as early as possible. We will present the rationale for those changes and others at the beginning of each section describing a particular grouping of similar projects, e.g., coal liquefaction. We will then discuss each project and present its current status along with past and future milestones. Emphasis is on projects with early payoff potential, particularly the direct utilization of coal. However, this near-term emphasis will not overshadow the need for a stong technological base for development of longer-term promising technologies and the need for a strong environmental concern.
Energy Research Program of the U.S. Department of the Interior
Author: United States. Department of the Interior. Office of Research and Development
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Fuel
Languages : en
Pages : 536
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Fuel
Languages : en
Pages : 536
Book Description
Fossil Energy Research Program of the Energy Research and Development Administration
Author: United States. Energy Research and Development Administration. Assistant Administrator for Fossil Energy
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Energy policy
Languages : en
Pages : 286
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Energy policy
Languages : en
Pages : 286
Book Description
Department of Energy Research and Development Programs
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Subcommittee on Energy Research and Development
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 900
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 900
Book Description
Department of Energy Research and Development Programs--fiscal Year 1987
Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. Subcommittee on Energy Research and Development
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Energy development
Languages : en
Pages : 1264
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Energy development
Languages : en
Pages : 1264
Book Description
Prospective Evaluation of Applied Energy Research and Development at DOE (Phase One)
Author: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309096049
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 138
Book Description
In 2001, the National Research Council (NRC) completed a congressionally mandated assessment of the benefits and costs of DOE's fossil energy and energy efficiency R&D programs, Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It? The Congress followed this retrospective study by directing DOE to request the NRC to develop a methodology for assessing prospective benefits. The first phase of this projectâ€"development of the methodologyâ€"began in December 2003. Phase two will make the methodology more robust and explore related issues, and subsequent phases will apply the methodology to review the prospective benefits of different DOE fossil energy and energy efficiency R&D programs. In developing this project, three considerations were particularly important. First, the study should adapt the work of the retrospective study. Second, the project should develop a methodology that provides a rigorous calculation of benefits and risks, and a practical and consistent process for its application. Third, the methodology should be transparent, should not require extensive resources for implementation, and should produce easily understood results. This report presents the results of phase one. It focuses on adaptation of the retrospective methodology to a prospective context.
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309096049
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 138
Book Description
In 2001, the National Research Council (NRC) completed a congressionally mandated assessment of the benefits and costs of DOE's fossil energy and energy efficiency R&D programs, Energy Research at DOE: Was It Worth It? The Congress followed this retrospective study by directing DOE to request the NRC to develop a methodology for assessing prospective benefits. The first phase of this projectâ€"development of the methodologyâ€"began in December 2003. Phase two will make the methodology more robust and explore related issues, and subsequent phases will apply the methodology to review the prospective benefits of different DOE fossil energy and energy efficiency R&D programs. In developing this project, three considerations were particularly important. First, the study should adapt the work of the retrospective study. Second, the project should develop a methodology that provides a rigorous calculation of benefits and risks, and a practical and consistent process for its application. Third, the methodology should be transparent, should not require extensive resources for implementation, and should produce easily understood results. This report presents the results of phase one. It focuses on adaptation of the retrospective methodology to a prospective context.