Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Final Environmental Impact Statement (final EIS) for the Disposal and Reuse of the Former Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach, Detachment Concord, Concord, California
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) for the Disposal and Reuse of the Former Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach, Detachment Concord, Concord, California
Author: United States. Navy
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Federal Register
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Delegated legislation
Languages : en
Pages : 284
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Delegated legislation
Languages : en
Pages : 284
Book Description
Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Disposal and Reuse of Long Beach Complex, Long Beach, California
Author: United States. Navy Department
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact statements
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact statements
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)/environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Disposal and Reuse of Naval Medical Center, Oakland, California
Author: United States. Navy Department
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact statements
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact statements
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Disposal and Reuse of Hunters Point Shipyard
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact statements
Languages : en
Pages : 570
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Environmental impact statements
Languages : en
Pages : 570
Book Description
Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement/environmental Impact Report
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Book Description
Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Los Angeles/Long Beach (LA-2) Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site Designation
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dredging
Languages : en
Pages : 392
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Dredging
Languages : en
Pages : 392
Book Description
Draft Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report for the Disposal and Reuse of the Former Naval Medical Center Oakland, Oakland, California
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 23
Book Description
This joint environmental impact statement/environmental impact report (EIS/EIR) evaluates the potential impacts to the environment that may result from the Navy disposal and implementation of land use alternatives proposed by the Oakland Base Reuse Authority (OBRA) for the reuse of Naval Medical Center, Oakland, California (NMCO). NMCO will be closing, pursuant to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act (DBCRA) of 1990, Public Law (PL) 101-510 Title XXIX, referred to in this document as BRAC. This EIS/EIR has been prepared in accordance with: The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended; The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended; The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations on implementing NEPA; Navy guidelines: and Navy guidelines; and The Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (DBCRA), as amended by the 1993 Base Realignment and Closure process. The NEPA federal action evaluated in this EIS/EIR is the disposal of federal surplus property at the NMCO site, while the local CEQA project evaluated is the proposed reuse of the NMCO site, presented as four reuse alternatives.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 23
Book Description
This joint environmental impact statement/environmental impact report (EIS/EIR) evaluates the potential impacts to the environment that may result from the Navy disposal and implementation of land use alternatives proposed by the Oakland Base Reuse Authority (OBRA) for the reuse of Naval Medical Center, Oakland, California (NMCO). NMCO will be closing, pursuant to the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act (DBCRA) of 1990, Public Law (PL) 101-510 Title XXIX, referred to in this document as BRAC. This EIS/EIR has been prepared in accordance with: The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended; The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended; The Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations on implementing NEPA; Navy guidelines: and Navy guidelines; and The Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 (DBCRA), as amended by the 1993 Base Realignment and Closure process. The NEPA federal action evaluated in this EIS/EIR is the disposal of federal surplus property at the NMCO site, while the local CEQA project evaluated is the proposed reuse of the NMCO site, presented as four reuse alternatives.
Final Environmental Impact Statement. Reuse of Naval Station Puget Sound, Sand Point, Seattle, Washington. Volume 3, (General Errata, Comments, and Responses).
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 248
Book Description
This volume contains a copy of each written comment received on the Sand Point Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and responses to all comments. The proposed administrative action analyzed in this Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) continues to be the disposal of real property made available by the closure of the Naval Station Sand Point. The alternatives considered in this EIS (City Plan and Options, Muckleshoot Plan, and the No-action Alternative) are intended to evaluate three separate proposals for the reuse of the property. Section 2 lists changes between the DEIS and the FEIS. These changes are either editorial or reflect changes in the situation that have occurred since the DEIS was prepared. Comments on the DEIS and responses to the comments appear in Section 3. The organization of the comments and responses is discussed in the following two paragraphs. Persons commenting fell into four groups: representatives of federal agencies, local agencies, citizen groups, and individual citizens. The comments have been organized accordingly and assigned the following letter-codes: F Federal agency; L Local agency; CG Citizen group, and I Individual citizen. Within these groupings, responses are ordered alphabetically by author's name and designated F-1, F-2, and so on. Separate topics addressed within each written comment have been numbered also. Responses are keyed to comment and topic. Thus, comment L-1 has responses L-1-1 to L-1-40.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 248
Book Description
This volume contains a copy of each written comment received on the Sand Point Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) and responses to all comments. The proposed administrative action analyzed in this Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) continues to be the disposal of real property made available by the closure of the Naval Station Sand Point. The alternatives considered in this EIS (City Plan and Options, Muckleshoot Plan, and the No-action Alternative) are intended to evaluate three separate proposals for the reuse of the property. Section 2 lists changes between the DEIS and the FEIS. These changes are either editorial or reflect changes in the situation that have occurred since the DEIS was prepared. Comments on the DEIS and responses to the comments appear in Section 3. The organization of the comments and responses is discussed in the following two paragraphs. Persons commenting fell into four groups: representatives of federal agencies, local agencies, citizen groups, and individual citizens. The comments have been organized accordingly and assigned the following letter-codes: F Federal agency; L Local agency; CG Citizen group, and I Individual citizen. Within these groupings, responses are ordered alphabetically by author's name and designated F-1, F-2, and so on. Separate topics addressed within each written comment have been numbered also. Responses are keyed to comment and topic. Thus, comment L-1 has responses L-1-1 to L-1-40.