Final Cultural Resource Inventory Report

Final Cultural Resource Inventory Report PDF Author: Garfield County
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Rio Blanco County (Colo.)
Languages : en
Pages : 42

Get Book Here

Book Description

Final Cultural Resource Inventory Report

Final Cultural Resource Inventory Report PDF Author: Garfield County
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Rio Blanco County (Colo.)
Languages : en
Pages : 42

Get Book Here

Book Description


Cultural Resource Inventory Guidelines

Cultural Resource Inventory Guidelines PDF Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Nevada State Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Antiquities
Languages : en
Pages : 58

Get Book Here

Book Description


Cultural Resource Inventory Report

Cultural Resource Inventory Report PDF Author: Larson-Tibesar Associates
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Archaeological surveying
Languages : en
Pages : 3

Get Book Here

Book Description


Great III - Cultural Resource Inventory

Great III - Cultural Resource Inventory PDF Author: Craig Sturdevant
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 228

Get Book Here

Book Description
This Cultural Resource Inventory is presented in two parts: (1) Volume I Summary of Findings; and (2) Volume II Bibliography. In Volume I of the methodological considerations involved in all processes of the investigation are discussed. The Corps Base Maps and computer record and programs are placed with the St. Louis District, Corps of Engineers, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources/Historic Preservation Program, and the Illinois Department of Conservation/Division of Historic Sites, and are considered sensitive information. The major values of the GREAT III cultural resource inventory report documents are in their potential use as planning tools.

Walker Ranch, Boulder County, Colorado

Walker Ranch, Boulder County, Colorado PDF Author: Boulder County (Colo.)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description


Cultural Resource Inventory Guidelines

Cultural Resource Inventory Guidelines PDF Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Nevada State Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Antiquities
Languages : en
Pages : 54

Get Book Here

Book Description


Class II cultural resource inventory, East Mesa and West Mesa regions, Imperial Valley, final report

Class II cultural resource inventory, East Mesa and West Mesa regions, Imperial Valley, final report PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book Here

Book Description


A Final Cultural Resource Inventory Report of the Peabody Nucla Coal Mine in South Central Montrose County North of Nucla, Colorado

A Final Cultural Resource Inventory Report of the Peabody Nucla Coal Mine in South Central Montrose County North of Nucla, Colorado PDF Author: Montrose County (Colo.)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 86

Get Book Here

Book Description


Cuyapaipe Indian Reservation Cultural Resource Inventory

Cuyapaipe Indian Reservation Cultural Resource Inventory PDF Author: Clifford V. F. Taylor
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : California
Languages : en
Pages : 290

Get Book Here

Book Description


The Reanalysis of Class II Cultural Resource Inventory Data from the Lower White River Known Recoverable Coal Resource Area

The Reanalysis of Class II Cultural Resource Inventory Data from the Lower White River Known Recoverable Coal Resource Area PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Archaeological surveying
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book Here

Book Description
"On June 30, Gordon & Kranzush, Inc, (G&K) was contracted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to conduct a Class II (sample) inventory of approximately 6.7% (8500 acres) of 126,567 acres of the Lower White River Danforth Hills Known Recoverable Coal Resource Areas (KRCRAs) in the BLM Craig District in Moffat and Rio Blanco Counties, Colorado. The sample inventory was authorized under Contract Number YA-553-CTO-1063, and was designed to locate, record and evaluate the significances of all non-recent (pre-AD 1931), exposed cultural resources within a portion of the KRCRAs in a manner which would allow an objective estimate of the nature and distribution of cultural resources in the entire study area. These objectives were approached through 100% intensive pedestrian survey of 212 randomly selected forty-acre tracts drawn from an eligible sample unit universe of 1247 such tracts in the two KRCRAs, and through computer analyses of variable data recorded during the inventory which resulted in the formulation of a resource location predictive model for the study areas. In the final report submitted under YA-553-CTO-1063 (Gordon et al. 1982) G&K presented three predictive models of site location for the Danforth Hills and Lower White River KRCRAs. Under the hypothesis that environmental variations will cause variation in factors important to the prediction of resource location, individual discriminant analyses were performed using tract data from each of three recognized environmental zones: the Danforth Area, the Elk Springs Area and the Lower White River Area (Figure 1). The analyses resulted in a high degree of accuracy in predicting the presence or absence of cultural resources within the Danforth and the Elk Springs Areas, but G&K was unable to derive a predictive function for the Lower White River Area that exceeded approximately 67% in accuracy. G&K proposed modification of Contract Number YA-553-CTO-1063 to reanalyze data from the Lower White River Area to achieve a model accuracy rate of 75% or greater. BLM authorized the addition of Modification No. 1 of Contract Number YA-553-CTO-1063 on September 27, 1982. This document constitutes the final report of analyses conducted under Modification No. 1 of YA-553-CTO-1063"--Introduction.