Ensayos de derecho procesal civil: Relación procesal de cognición (Jurisdicción y competencia-formas del proceso y propuestas de reforma) PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Ensayos de derecho procesal civil: Relación procesal de cognición (Jurisdicción y competencia-formas del proceso y propuestas de reforma) PDF full book. Access full book title Ensayos de derecho procesal civil: Relación procesal de cognición (Jurisdicción y competencia-formas del proceso y propuestas de reforma) by Giuseppe Chiovenda. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Giuseppe Chiovenda
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : es
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Giuseppe Chiovenda
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : es
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Giuseppe Chiovenda
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Civil procedure
Languages : es
Pages : 397
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Giuseppe Chiovenda
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : es
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Diego Palomo Vélez
Publisher:
ISBN: 9782762389456
Category : Civil procedure
Languages : es
Pages : 394
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Bureau of Labor Statistics
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Labor supply
Languages : en
Pages : 126
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Fred R. David
Publisher: Prentice Hall
ISBN: 9780136015703
Category : Business planning
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
KEY BENFIT:David's Strategic Managementoffers a skills-oriented, practitioner perspective that has been updated with modern cases to reflect current research and strategy. This text covers strategy formulation issues such as business ethics, global vs. domestic operations, vision/mission, matrix analysis, partnering, joint venturing, competitive analysis, and includes a brand new cohesion case on the Walt Disney Company. For management professionals, small business owners and others involved in business.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Crime analysis
Languages : en
Pages : 548
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Marcelo Galuppo
Publisher: Initia Via Editora
ISBN: 8564912597
Category : Law
Languages : pt
Pages : 9
Get Book Here
Book Description
"The conference was organized by the Internationale Vereinigung für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie (International Association for the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy) – IVR and by a Associação Brasileira de Filosofia do Direito e de Sociologia do Direito (Brazilian Association for Philosophy of Law and Sociology of Law) – ABRAFI andtook place in Belo Horizonte, Brazil, at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais’ Campus, from July 21 through July 27, 2015. The papers published in the Proceedings were presented during the Conference in many Working Groups and Special Workshops, which represent the significant diversity of themes and subjects discussed by the participants from all over the world. They express the high leveled research and the creative endeavor of each author, and help us to understand the broad and distinct perspectives in order to understand Law from the standpoint of the main theme of this Conference: Human Rights, Rule of Law and the Contemporary Social Challenges in Complex Societies." – Editors.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Information storage and retrieval systems
Languages : en
Pages : 6
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Francis T. Cullen
Publisher: Createspace Independent Pub
ISBN: 9781478262503
Category : Social Science
Languages : en
Pages : 68
Get Book Here
Book Description
A theme that has persisted throughout the history of American corrections is that efforts should be made to reform offenders. In particular, at the beginning of the 1900s, the rehabilitative ideal was enthusiastically trumpeted and helped to direct the renovation of the correctional system (e.g., implementation of indeterminate sentencing, parole, probation, a separate juvenile justice system). For the next seven decades, offender treatment reigned as the dominant correctional philosophy. Then, in the early 1970s, rehabilitation suffered a precipitous reversal of fortune. The larger disruptions in American society in this era prompted a general critique of the “state run” criminal justice system. Rehabilitation was blamed by liberals for allowing the state to act coercively against offenders, and was blamed by conservatives for allowing the state to act leniently toward offenders. In this context, the death knell of rehabilitation was seemingly sounded by Robert Martinson's (1974b) influential “nothing works” essay, which reported that few treatment programs reduced recidivism. This review of evaluation studies gave legitimacy to the antitreatment sentiments of the day; it ostensibly “proved” what everyone “already knew”: Rehabilitation did not work. In the subsequent quarter century, a growing revisionist movement has questioned Martinson's portrayal of the empirical status of the effectiveness of treatment interventions. Through painstaking literature reviews, these revisionist scholars have shown that many correctional treatment programs are effective in decreasing recidivism. More recently, they have undertaken more sophisticated quantitative syntheses of an increasing body of evaluation studies through a technique called “meta-analysis.” These meta-analyses reveal that across evaluation studies, the recidivism rate is, on average, 10 percentage points lower for the treatment group than for the control group. However, this research has also suggested that some correctional interventions have no effect on offender criminality (e.g., punishment-oriented programs), while others achieve substantial reductions in recidivism (i.e., approximately 25 percent). This variation in program success has led to a search for those “principles” that distinguish effective treatment interventions from ineffective ones. There is theoretical and empirical support for the conclusion that the rehabilitation programs that achieve the greatest reductions in recidivism use cognitive-behavioral treatments, target known predictors of crime for change, and intervene mainly with high-risk offenders. “Multisystemic treatment” is a concrete example of an effective program that largely conforms to these principles. In the time ahead, it would appear prudent that correctional policy and practice be “evidence based.” Knowledgeable about the extant research, policymakers would embrace the view that rehabilitation programs, informed by the principles of effective intervention, can “work” to reduce recidivism and thus can help foster public safety. By reaffirming rehabilitation, they would also be pursuing a policy that is consistent with public opinion research showing that Americans continue to believe that offender treatment should be an integral goal of the correctional system.
