Defense Acquisitions

Defense Acquisitions PDF Author: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 84

Get Book Here

Book Description

Defense Acquisitions

Defense Acquisitions PDF Author: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 84

Get Book Here

Book Description


Defense acquisitions assessments of major weapon programs : report to Congressional committees.

Defense acquisitions assessments of major weapon programs : report to Congressional committees. PDF Author:
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428935258
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 139

Get Book Here

Book Description


Defense acquisitions assessments of selected major weapon programs : report to congressional committees.

Defense acquisitions assessments of selected major weapon programs : report to congressional committees. PDF Author: United States. Government Accountability Office
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1428930736
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 150

Get Book Here

Book Description


Defense Acquisitions

Defense Acquisitions PDF Author: United States. Government Accountability Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book Here

Book Description
This report is GAO's sixth annual assessment of selected weapon programs. Since 2000, the Department of Defense (DOD) has roughly doubled its planned investment in new systems from $790 billion to $1.6 trillion in 2007, but acquisition outcomes in terms of cost and schedule have not improved. Total acquisition costs for major defense programs in the fiscal year 2007 portfolio have increased 26 percent from first estimates, compared with 6 percent in 2000. Programs have also often failed to deliver capabilities when promised. DOD's acquisition outcomes appear increasingly suboptimal, a condition that needs to be corrected given the pressures faced by the department from other military and major nondiscretionary government demands. This report provides congressional and DOD decision makers with an independent, knowledge-based assessment of defense programs, identifying potential risks when a program's projected attainment of knowledge diverges from best practices. The programs assessed--most of which are considered major acquisitions by DOD--were selected using several factors: high dollar value, acquisition stage, and congressional interest. This report also highlights overall trends in DOD acquisition outcomes and issues raised by the cumulative experience of individual programs. GAO updates this report annually under the Comptroller General's authority to conduct evaluations on his own initiative. Of the 72 programs GAO assessed this year, none of them had proceeded through system development meeting the best practices standards for mature technologies, stable design, or mature production processes by critical junctures of the program, each of which are essential for achieving planned cost, schedule, and performance outcomes. The absence of wide-spread adoption of knowledge-based acquisition processes by DOD continues to be a major contributor to this lack of maturity. Aside from these knowledge-based issues, GAO this year gathered data on four additional factors that have the potential to influence DOD's ability to manage programs and improve outcomes--performance requirements changes, program manager tenure, reliance on nongovernmental personnel to help perform program office roles, and software management. GAO found that 63 percent of the programs had changed requirements once system development began, and also experienced significant program cost increases. Average tenure to date for program managers has been less than half of that called for by DOD policy. About 48 percent of DOD program office staff for programs GAO collected data from is composed of personnel outside of the government. Finally, roughly half the programs that provided GAO data experienced more than a 25 percent increase in the expected lines of software code since starting their respective system development programs. In response to previous GAO recommendations and congressional direction, DOD has recently taken actions that could help move the department toward more sound, knowledge-based acquisition processes. For example, a new concept decision review initiative, guidance for determining acquisition approaches based on capability need dates, and the establishment of review boards to monitor weapon system configuration changes could enable department officials to make more informed decisions in the early stages of a program and better match program requirements and resources, a key first step. Improvements to individual program acquisition outcomes will likely hinge on the success of initiatives like these, paired with knowledge-based strategies.

Defense acquisitions

Defense acquisitions PDF Author: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 72

Get Book Here

Book Description


Defense Acquisitions

Defense Acquisitions PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : United States
Languages : en
Pages : 182

Get Book Here

Book Description
The report examines how well DOD is planning and executing its weapon acquisition programs, an area that has been on GAO's high-risk list since 1990. This year's report is in response to the mandate in the joint explanatory statement to the Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009. The report includes (1) an analysis of the overall performance of DOD's 2008 portfolio of 96 major defense acquisition programs and a comparison to the portfolio performance at two other points in time, 5 years ago and 1 year ago; (2) an analysis of current cost and schedule outcomes and knowledge attained by key junctures in the acquisition process for a subset of 47 weapon programs, primarily in development, from the 2008 portfolio; (3) data on other factors that could impact program stability; and (4) an update on changes in DOD's acquisition policies. To conduct our assessment, GAO analyzed cost, schedule, and quantity data from DOD's Selected Acquisition Reports for the programs in DOD's 2003, 2007, and 2008 portfolios. GAO also collected data from program offices on technology, design, and manufacturing knowledge, as well as on other factors that might affect program stability. GAO analyzed this data and compiled one- or two-page assessments of 67 weapon programs.

Report to Congressional Committees

Report to Congressional Committees PDF Author: U. S Government U.S Government Accountability Office
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781503166523
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 190

Get Book Here

Book Description
This is GAO's annual assessment of DOD weapon system acquisitions, an area that has been on GAO's high risk list for more than 20 years. The report responds to the mandate in the joint explanatory statement to the DOD Appropriations Act, 2009. It includes observations on the cost and scheduled performance of DOD's 2012 portfolio of 86 major defense acquisition programs including, Missile Defense Agency's, Ballistic Missile Defense system.

Weapon Systems Annual Assessment

Weapon Systems Annual Assessment PDF Author: United States. Government Accountability Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Defense contracts
Languages : en
Pages : 217

Get Book Here

Book Description
This year’s assessment comes at a time of significant change to how DOD manages and oversees its major weapons programs. At the direction of Congress, DOD restructured the Office of the Secretary of Defense to focus more on capability development and less on program oversight, which now resides primarily with the three military departments. Amid these changes, this year GAO found that cost performance has slipped. Further, unlike prior years, programs initiated after major acquisition reforms were implemented in 2010 are now showing cost growth. This report provides observations on: 1. cost and schedule performance and contract awards for DOD’s 2018 portfolio of 82 programs that provide acquisition reports to Congress and 2. knowledge that 51 selected programs attained at key points in the acquisition process. Further, GAO presents individual assessments of 51 programs.

Weapon Systems Annual Assessment

Weapon Systems Annual Assessment PDF Author: United States. Government Accountability Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book Here

Book Description
In 2020, in an effort to deliver more timely and effective solutions to the warfighter, DOD revamped its department-wide acquisition policies. These policy changes responded to statutory provisions and long-standing concerns from some members of Congress that the defense acquisition process was overly bureaucratic and too slow. As part of these changes, DOD established the Adaptive Acquisition Framework, which has a variety of pathways for acquisition programs. This framework includes the major capability acquisition pathway to acquire and modernize DOD programs that provide enduring capability, including major defense acquisition programs, and the middle tier of acquisition pathway for rapid prototyping and rapid fielding.

Weapon Acquisition

Weapon Acquisition PDF Author: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Weapons systems
Languages : en
Pages : 24

Get Book Here

Book Description