Construction Adjudication in Malaysia

Construction Adjudication in Malaysia PDF Author: Wai Loon Lam
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789672049821
Category : Arbitration and award
Languages : en
Pages : 586

Get Book Here

Book Description

Construction Adjudication in Malaysia

Construction Adjudication in Malaysia PDF Author: Wai Loon Lam
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789672049821
Category : Arbitration and award
Languages : en
Pages : 586

Get Book Here

Book Description


Construction Adjudication in Malaysia

Construction Adjudication in Malaysia PDF Author: Wai Loon Lam
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789814359849
Category : Arbitration and award
Languages : en
Pages : 767

Get Book Here

Book Description


Construction Adjudication in Malaysia

Construction Adjudication in Malaysia PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789672723264
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 100

Get Book Here

Book Description


Adjudication of Construction Payment Disputes in Malaysia

Adjudication of Construction Payment Disputes in Malaysia PDF Author: Kok Fong Chow
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Construction contracts
Languages : en
Pages : 467

Get Book Here

Book Description


Adjudication of Construction Payment Disputes in Malaysia

Adjudication of Construction Payment Disputes in Malaysia PDF Author: Chow Kok Fong
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789674005580
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book Here

Book Description


Construction Adjudication Reports of Malaysia 2018

Construction Adjudication Reports of Malaysia 2018 PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN: 9789672187479
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description


A Practical Guide to Construction Adjudication

A Practical Guide to Construction Adjudication PDF Author: James Pickavance
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
ISBN: 1118717953
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 770

Get Book Here

Book Description
In the United Kingdom, adjudication is available as a right for parties to a construction contract, following the enactment of the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996. In general, within a comparatively short period of time, parties in dispute will have a decision from an adjudicator, which, except in limited circumstances, the courts will enforce. Adjudication has become the number one method of dispute resolution in the construction industry. The short timescale means that a party needs to know what to do, when to do it and be able to check that the other party and the adjudicator are following the right steps. A Practical Guide to Construction Adjudication gives parties the necessary information to achieve this. It provides a straightforward overview of the process and procedure of adjudication by reference to legislation and case law, augmented with practical guidance including suggestions on what to do or not to do, drafting tips and checklists. Separate chapters for Scotland and Northern Ireland identify and explain the differences in procedure and judicial interpretation between those jurisdictions and England and Wales, and further detailed explanations of the adjudication regimes in Australia, Ireland, Malaysia, New Zealand and Singapore are included. Each of the chapters on jurisdictions outside England and Wales has been written by senior experts in those jurisdictions to ensure the content is accurate and insightful. There are a range of helpful appendices including a bank of model form adjudication documents and tabulated detailed comparisons of the Scheme for Construction Contracts, the other major adjudication rules, the major adjudicator nominating bodies and the UK and international regimes. Readers will particularly appreciate the most comprehensive index of adjudication cases available, sorted into 260 subject headings providing immediate access to all the reported cases on any adjudication topic.

Construction Adjudication

Construction Adjudication PDF Author: John Riches
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
ISBN: 1405172061
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 424

Get Book Here

Book Description
Adjudication has been the main means of settling construction disputes since it was first introduced by the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996, and a substantial body of case law has now built up. This book established itself as the key authority on adjudication when it was first published. It has now been revised to reflect the authors' experience of adjudication in practice and to cover the large number of court decisions. It features useful appendices on adjudication materials.

International Contractual and Statutory Adjudication

International Contractual and Statutory Adjudication PDF Author: Andrew Burr
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISBN: 1315294524
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 463

Get Book Here

Book Description
A compilation of commentaries on the various jurisdictions where there either is, or is planned, a statutory adjudication system , this is a review of such systems worldwide in the commercial and construction fields. It features analysis by specialist advisory editors on the adjudication system in place in each separate jurisdiction, together with a copy of the relevant local legislation, and permits a comparative approach between each. This book addresses statutory adjudication in a way that is practically useful and academically rigorous. As such, it remains an essential reference for any lawyer, project manager,contractor or academic involved with the commercial and construction fields.

Statutory Construction Adjudication

Statutory Construction Adjudication PDF Author: Noushad Ali Naseem Ameer Ali
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Construction contracts
Languages : en
Pages : 366

Get Book Here

Book Description
The construction industry contributes significantly to any country’s economy. However, there remain two chronic problems. They are: (i) delayed or non-payment, and (ii) costly and protracted dispute resolution. The severity of these problems have led to several jurisdictions including the UK, New Zealand, Singapore, Malaysia, and Australia to legislate on payment provisions and introduce adjudication as a rapid dispute resolution method. This research was done to analyse the effectiveness of adjudication provisions in legislation governing payment and adjudication focused on the New Zealand and Malaysian Acts. To achieve this aim, research objectives were formulated under 6 areas: (i) analysis of construction dispute resolution methods, (ii) key coverage and scope of the adjudication provisions in the Acts, (iii) clarity of legislative drafting and style, (iv) time taken to resolve disputes in adjudications, costs of adjudications, and quality of adjudicators’ decisions, and (v) quality of adjudicators and their training, and (vi) an initiation of the development of a decision-making model for adjudication legislation. These objectives were achieved using a mixed method to analyse the key features and effectiveness of the adjudication provisions in these Acts. The mixed method comprised legal documentary analysis by examining primary and secondary legal sources (including legislation and case law), a quantitative approach (through questionnaires distributed to adjudicators in New Zealand), and a case study relating to the Malaysian Act. The findings show that although all these Acts use the same term - adjudication, a deeper analysis shows some of the concepts and details are significantly different among jurisdictions. There appear to be two major models – the narrower New South Wales model that focuses on payment adopted by several other states in Australia and Singapore and the wider UK model adopted with modifications by New Zealand where all disputes may be resolved through adjudication. The Acts in New Zealand and Malaysia have very similar objectives on dispute resolution, but a detailed analysis shows the details are different. The findings show there is incongruence between the objectives and the detailed provisions of the Malaysian Act. The Malaysian Act provides the longest adjudication durations and the most elaborate adjudication processes including provisions for hearings, ordering discovery of documents, and even ordering evidence to be given on oath. However, despite the long durations, the Act takes the narrow path of only allowing adjudication for payment claims for work done or services rendered. Empirical evidence was also obtained from a questionnaire survey of adjudicators in New Zealand, which had a response rate of 73% of the total number of adjudicators listed on the then three adjudicator authorised nominating authorities in New Zealand. The main findings from the documentary analysis and the survey indicate that (i) the legislative drafting style of the New Zealand Act and some of the Australian Acts were written in modern plain language while others such as Singapore adopted the traditional style, (ii) the majority of adjudicators in New Zealand found the Act easy to understand, the actual time taken in adjudications were generally within the overall timeframes provided under the Act, and costs were well contained. Case analysis shows a significant number of adjudicators’ decisions that were referred to court were related to procedural matters. Although the proportion of adjudication decisions that were referred to court are relatively small at under 5%, if the quality of adjudicators were improved through enhanced training, there may be a possibility the number of cases being challenged in court could be lowered. A new task-based approach to developing adjudicator standards and testing and accrediting adjudicators was developed as a proof-of-concept. This approach was demonstrated using the Malaysian Act as a base and modified and adapted to apply to the New Zealand Act. The findings also led to a development of a preliminary decision-making model on adjudication legislation. To demonstrate its potential application the model was applied to the Malaysian Act and the first court case on adjudication in Malaysia. Among the conclusions is that the decision-making model could be used by countries considering adjudication and those considering amending their existing payment and adjudication Acts. The model can help in making informed choices and direction on concepts for the Act being considered. Among the conclusions formed as a result of these findings was the recommendations to the Commonwealth Association of Legislative Counsel to produce a uniform drafting style guide for all Commonwealth countries. Consistency in drafting style can help avoid discrepancies in interpretation.