Constitutional Courts in Comparison PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Constitutional Courts in Comparison PDF full book. Access full book title Constitutional Courts in Comparison by Ralf Rogowski. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Ralf Rogowski
Publisher: Berghahn Books
ISBN: 1785330969
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 316
Get Book Here
Book Description
Constitutional litigation in general attracts two distinct types of conflict: disputes of a highly politicized or culturally controversial nature and requests from citizens claiming a violation of a fundamental constitutional right. The side-by-side comparison between the U.S. Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court provides a novel socio-legal approach in studying constitutional litigation, focusing on conditions of mobilisation, decision-making and implementation. This updated and revised second edition includes a number of new contributions on the political status of the courts in their democratic political cultures.
Author: Ralf Rogowski
Publisher: Berghahn Books
ISBN: 1785330969
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 316
Get Book Here
Book Description
Constitutional litigation in general attracts two distinct types of conflict: disputes of a highly politicized or culturally controversial nature and requests from citizens claiming a violation of a fundamental constitutional right. The side-by-side comparison between the U.S. Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court provides a novel socio-legal approach in studying constitutional litigation, focusing on conditions of mobilisation, decision-making and implementation. This updated and revised second edition includes a number of new contributions on the political status of the courts in their democratic political cultures.
Author: Ralf Rogowski
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781785332739
Category : Constitutional courts
Languages : en
Pages : 304
Get Book Here
Book Description
The side-by-side comparison between the U.S. Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court provides a novel socio-legal approach in studying constitutional litigation, focusing on conditions of mobilisation, decision-making and implementation.
Author: Ralf Rogowski
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781785330957
Category : Constitutional courts
Languages : en
Pages : 304
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Ralf Rogowski
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781571814777
Category : Constitutional courts
Languages : en
Pages : 262
Get Book Here
Book Description
Em sammenligning af USA' højesteret og den tyske føderale forfatningsdomstol
Author: Thomas Gawron
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 26
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Víctor Ferreres Comella
Publisher: Yale University Press
ISBN: 0300148682
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 254
Get Book Here
Book Description
Víctor Ferreres Comella contrasts the European 'centralised' constitutional court model, in which one court system is used to adjudicate constitutional questions, with a decentralised model such as that of the United States, in which courts deal with both constitutional and non-constitutional questions.
Author: Julio Ríos-Figueroa
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1107079780
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 255
Get Book Here
Book Description
The book proposes an informational theory of constitutional review highlighting the mediator role of constitutional courts in democratic conflict solving.
Author: Christine Landfried
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1316999084
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 411
Get Book Here
Book Description
The power of national and transnational constitutional courts to issue binding rulings in interpreting the constitution or an international treaty has been endlessly discussed. What does it mean for democratic governance that non-elected judges influence politics and policies? The authors of Judicial Power - legal scholars, political scientists, and judges - take a fresh look at this problem. To date, research has concentrated on the legitimacy, or the effectiveness, or specific decision-making methods of constitutional courts. By contrast, the authors here explore the relationship among these three factors. This book presents the hypothesis that judicial review allows for a method of reflecting on social integration that differs from political methods, and, precisely because of the difference between judicial and political decision-making, strengthens democratic governance. This hypothesis is tested in case studies on the role of constitutional courts in political transformations, on the methods of these courts, and on transnational judicial interactions.
Author: Stefanus Hendrianto
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 135158491X
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 359
Get Book Here
Book Description
This book critically evaluates different models of judicial leadership in Indonesia to examine the impact that individual chief justices can have on the development of constitutional courts. It explores the importance of this leadership as a factor explaining the dynamic of judicial power. Drawing on an Aristotelean model of heroism and the established idea of judicial heroes to explore the types of leadership that judges can exercise, it illustrates how Indonesia’s recent experience offers a stark contrast between the different models. First, a prudential-minimalist heroic chief justice who knows how to enhance the Court’s authority while fortifying the Court’s status by playing a minimalist role in policy areas. Second, a bold and aggressive heroic chief justice, employing an ambitious constitutional interpretation. The third model is a soldier-type chief justice, who portrays himself as a subordinate of the Executive and Legislature. Contrary perhaps to expectations, the book’s findings show a more cautious initial approach to be the most effective. The experience of Indonesia clearly illustrates the importance of heroic judicial leadership and how the approach chosen by a court can have serious consequences for its success. This book will be a valuable resource for those interested in the law and politics of Indonesia, comparative constitutional law, and comparative judicial politics.
Author: Mark Tushnet
Publisher: Princeton University Press
ISBN: 1400828155
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 288
Get Book Here
Book Description
Unlike many other countries, the United States has few constitutional guarantees of social welfare rights such as income, housing, or healthcare. In part this is because many Americans believe that the courts cannot possibly enforce such guarantees. However, recent innovations in constitutional design in other countries suggest that such rights can be judicially enforced--not by increasing the power of the courts but by decreasing it. In Weak Courts, Strong Rights, Mark Tushnet uses a comparative legal perspective to show how creating weaker forms of judicial review may actually allow for stronger social welfare rights under American constitutional law. Under "strong-form" judicial review, as in the United States, judicial interpretations of the constitution are binding on other branches of government. In contrast, "weak-form" review allows the legislature and executive to reject constitutional rulings by the judiciary--as long as they do so publicly. Tushnet describes how weak-form review works in Great Britain and Canada and discusses the extent to which legislatures can be expected to enforce constitutional norms on their own. With that background, he turns to social welfare rights, explaining the connection between the "state action" or "horizontal effect" doctrine and the enforcement of social welfare rights. Tushnet then draws together the analysis of weak-form review and that of social welfare rights, explaining how weak-form review could be used to enforce those rights. He demonstrates that there is a clear judicial path--not an insurmountable judicial hurdle--to better enforcement of constitutional social welfare rights.
