Author: Travis J. Carlson
Publisher: Nova Science Publishers
ISBN: 9781622574025
Category : Energy policy
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
After discussing the basic methodology of life-cycle assessments and examining the choice of boundaries, design features, and input assumptions, this book compares several of the publicly available assessments of life-cycle emissions data for Canadian oil sands crudes against each other and against those of other global reference crudes. As congressional concern over the environmental impacts of Canadian oil sands production may encompass both a broad understanding of the global resource as well as a specific assessment of the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, the book surveys both the general scientific literature as well as the individual findings of the State Department's Keystone XL Project Environmental Impact Statement. As life-cycle assessments have become an influential, albeit developing, methodology for collecting, analysing, and comparing GHG emissions, this book concludes with a discussion of some tools for policy-makers who are interested in using these assessments to investigate the potential impacts of U.S. energy policy choices on the environment.
Author: Travis J. Carlson
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781622574032
Category : BUSINESS & ECONOMICS
Languages : en
Pages : 142
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Dennis McConaghy
Publisher: Dundurn
ISBN: 1459738217
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 271
Get Book Here
Book Description
#1 Calgary Herald Bestseller An investigation of the history and demise of the most controversial North American energy infrastructure project. In 2015, President Barack Obama denied approval for TransCanada’s Keystone XL pipeline, which would have carried crude oil from the Canadian oil sands to the U.S. Gulf Coast, providing great economic benefit to Canada. Over seven years of regulatory process, environmental activism, and media attention, the project had become infamous, a cause célèbre for North America’s ENGO movement and a test of Obama’s bona fides in the face of global climate change risk. As one of TransCanada’s senior executive group, Dennis McConaghy provides an insider’s perspective of Keystone XL’s history and demise. How did this routine infrastructure acquire iconic status? Why couldn’t government and industry find some accommodation to salvage the project? And most importantly, what must Canada learn from Keystone XL’s demise? Can the country find common ground between economic value and credible carbon policy?
Author: Jonathan L. Remseur
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781500534899
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 64
Get Book Here
Book Description
If constructed, the Keystone XL pipeline would transport crude oil derived from oil sands sites in Alberta, Canada, to U.S. refineries and other destinations. Because the pipeline would cross an international border, it requires a Presidential Permit.
Author: Richard K., Richard Lattanzio, Analyst in Environmental Policy
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781477673027
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Get Book Here
Book Description
Recent congressional interest in U.S. energy policy has focused in part on ways through which the United States could secure more economical and reliable crude oil resources both domestically and internationally. Many forecasters identify petroleum products refined from Canadian oil sands crude as one possible solution. Canadian oil sands account for about 46% of Canada's total oil production, and that number is expected to rise from its current level of 1.2 million barrels per day (mbd) to 2.8 mbd by 2015. Further, the infrastructure to produce, upgrade, refine, and transport the resource from Canadian oil sand reserves to the United States is in place, and additional infrastructure projects-such as the Keystone XL pipeline-have been proposed.
Author: James Burkhard
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 23
Get Book Here
Book Description
A key uncertainty about the future role of the Canadian oil sands is whether the US government will allow production from Canada to expand its reach into the United States. The US Department of State is reviewing the application by TransCanada to build a pipeline from Alberta, Canada, to the US Gulf Coast. For the Keystone XL pipeline review, the DOS commissioned studies to evaluate US market dynamics and life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as part of the Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS) released for comment in April 2011. This IHS CERA Special Report identifies and explains differences between the SDEIS and IHS CERA analyses on three critical questions: 1) When is the new pipeline infrastructure required, and could this pipeline affect gasoline prices?; 2) What are the likely substitutes for oil sands crudes if Keystone XL is not approved?; and, 3) What are the incremental GHG emissions associated with consuming oil sands?
Author: Jonathan L. Ramseur
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781457836428
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 54
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Samuel Avery
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780985574826
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 225
Get Book Here
Book Description
Explores the political, social, economic, and ecological issues that underlie the Keystone XL pipeline project, an endeavor that would release enough carbon into the atmosphere to drastically hasten climate change.
Author: Congressional Research Congressional Research Service
Publisher: CreateSpace
ISBN: 9781503282643
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 24
Get Book Here
Book Description
TransCanada's proposed Keystone XL Pipeline would transport oil sands crude from Canada and shale oil produced in North Dakota and Montana to a market hub in Nebraska for further delivery to Gulf Coast refineries. The pipeline would consist of 875 miles of 36-inch pipe with the capacity to transport 830,000 barrels per day. Because it would cross the Canadian-U.S. border, Keystone XL requires a Presidential Permit from the State Department predicated on the department's determination that the project would serve the national interest. That determination considers environmental impacts, evaluated and documented in an environmental impact statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). TransCanada originally applied for a Presidential Permit for the Keystone XL Pipeline in 2008. An issue that arose during the permit review was environmental impacts in the Sand Hills region of Nebraska. This concern led the Nebraska legislature to enact new state pipeline siting requirements that would alter the pipeline route. The Presidential Permit was subsequently denied by the State Department. In May 2012, TransCanada reapplied for a Presidential Permit with a modified route through Nebraska. The new permit application initiated a new NEPA process. In January 2014, the State Department released the final EIS for the proposed Keystone XL Pipeline. The State Department subsequently began to focus on whether issuance of the permit would be in the national interest. To make such a determination, the department considers various factors related to the project and seeks input from members of the public and selected federal agencies. The public comment period closed in March 2014. In April 2014, the Department of State notified the other federal agencies that it would provide more time for their input due to ongoing litigation in the Nebraska Supreme Court challenging the state's approval of the altered pipeline route. Although the department stated that its review of the permit application would continue, many analysts viewed this notification as effectively suspending the permit review. Development of Keystone XL has been controversial. Proponents base their arguments primarily on increasing the diversity of the U.S. petroleum supply and economic benefits, especially jobs. Pipeline opposition stems in part from concern regarding the greenhouse gas emissions from the development of Canadian oil sands, continued U.S. dependency on fossil fuels, and the risk of a potential release of heavy crude. There is also concern over how much crude oil, or petroleum products refined from Keystone XL crude, would be exported overseas. Relations between the U.S. and Canadian governments have also been an issue. With the fate of Keystone XL uncertain, Canadian oil producers have pursued other shipment options, including other pipelines and rail.
Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Science, Space, and Technology (2011). Subcommittee on Environment
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Oil sands
Languages : en
Pages : 108
Get Book Here
Book Description
