Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-098

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-098 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Mutual funds may not be used as securities for the deposit of state and municipal funds. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1986 Supp. 9-1101; 9-1402; 75-4201; K.A.R. 17-11-2; 15 U.S.C. section 80a-1 e̲t̲ s̲e̲q̲.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-098

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-098 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Mutual funds may not be used as securities for the deposit of state and municipal funds. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1986 Supp. 9-1101; 9-1402; 75-4201; K.A.R. 17-11-2; 15 U.S.C. section 80a-1 e̲t̲ s̲e̲q̲.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-121

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-121 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
K.S.A. 20-105 provides that to be qualified to hold the office of justice of the supreme court or judge of the court of appeals, a person must have been regularly admitted to practice law in Kansas and have engaged in the active and continuous practice of law for a period of at least ten years prior to the date of appointment as justice or judge. Though the strict definition of "active practice" would require that the legal activities of the person in question be pursued on a full-time basis and constitute his regular business, the general rule that statutory provisions imposing qualifications for office should be construed in favor of those seeking to hold office would serve to soften this requirement. Thus, a potential nominee need not be a full-time trial attorney to be considered as actively engaged in the practice of law, and is not automatically disqualified merely for holding a position which does not require legal expertise. Cited herein: K.S.A. 20-105; 20-3002; K.S.A. 1986 Supp. 22-3707.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-023

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-023 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Since it is the client's intent which governs the distinction between privileged and non-privileged communications, a determination of whether or not information exchanged between attorney and client is privileged requires a case-by-case consideration. To ensure compliance with the dictates of Canon 4 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and K.S.A. 60-426, when a supervising agency requests that an attorney release particular client information for enumerative or evaluative purposes, the attorney may either obtain the client's consent to do so, or, if the client refuses, compile the requested data in a less intrusive manner. If, however, the agency requests the data for purposes of determining a client's financial eligibility onto satisfy funding requirements, the exception to the privilege under DR-4-101(C)(4) would apply, making the aforementioned precautions unnecessary. Cited herein: K.S.A. 45-217; 45-221; 60-426; K.S.A. 1986 Supp. 20-3100, Supreme Court Rule No. 225, D.R. 4-101.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-126

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-126 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Medical costs incurred by an indigent offender before or at the time of arrest are to be borne by the county if the offender is subsequently charged with a violation of state law.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-034

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-034 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Service of process is a condition precedent to an employee's request for the provision of defense counsel by a governmental entity, unless such condition is waived. If, after the employee has been served, the entity lawfully refuses to provide for such defense, and if the request was made in accordance with the statute, then the entity must reimburse the employee for attorney expenses incurred as a result of the retention of private counsel. Absent service of process, timely request for, and proper refusal of providing legal defense counsel, no right is conferred on the employee to retain private counsel at the expense of the governmental entity. Cited herein: K.S.A. 75-6103, 75-6108, 75-6109.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-065

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-065 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Under the provisions of Article 3, section 5 of the Kansas Constitution, no member of the Supreme Court Nominating Commission shall, while he or she is a member, hold any other "public office" by appointment. The term "public office" refers to the common-law concept of a public office, and except where the office of city attorney has been stripped of all prosecutorial and other sovereign power (through the exercise of home rule powers), a city attorney holds a public office. Cited herein: Kan. Const., Article 3, section 5.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-191

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-191 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Amtrack may sell alcoholic beverages in Kansas only if licensed to do so by the Director of the Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Any license granted by the Director is subject to continued eligibility, compliance with all relevant statutes and rules and regulations, and any required local authorization. While current law may make it impractical for Amtrack to obtain a license to sell alcoholic beverages in Kansas, the legislature may provide for temporary membership in class B clubs located on railroads such as it has for class B clubs located in hotels or municipal airports. Cited herein: K.S.A. 41-2601, as amended by L. 1987, ch. 182, section 60; K.S.A. 41-2702, as amended by L. 1987, ch. 182, section 98; L. 1987, ch. 182, sections 87, 88, 89; Kan. Const., Art. 15, section 10.

Model Rules of Professional Conduct

Model Rules of Professional Conduct PDF Author: American Bar Association. House of Delegates
Publisher: American Bar Association
ISBN: 9781590318737
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 216

Get Book Here

Book Description
The Model Rules of Professional Conduct provides an up-to-date resource for information on legal ethics. Federal, state and local courts in all jurisdictions look to the Rules for guidance in solving lawyer malpractice cases, disciplinary actions, disqualification issues, sanctions questions and much more. In this volume, black-letter Rules of Professional Conduct are followed by numbered Comments that explain each Rule's purpose and provide suggestions for its practical application. The Rules will help you identify proper conduct in a variety of given situations, review those instances where discretionary action is possible, and define the nature of the relationship between you and your clients, colleagues and the courts.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-004

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-004 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
The Kansas Open Records Act provides that public agencies may charge reasonable fees for photocopying public records. Fees are reasonable if they do not exceed the actual cost, or costs directly incurred, in providing copies. The twenty cents per page fee charged by Unified School District No. 431 is not unreasonable as it reflects the actual costs incurred in furnishing copies of public records. Cited herein: K.S.A. 45-215; 45-216; 45-219; 5 U.S.C. section 552.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-128

Attorney General Opinion No. 1987-128 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Topeka Code Section 34-193(6), which does not permit persons who have been previously arrested, but not convicted on drug charges, to obtain a license to carry a firearm while employed as a security guard, is violative of both state law and the Constitution of the United States. Cited herein: K.S.A. 21-3109; U.S. Const., 14th Amendment.