Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-106

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-106 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Hazing, as defined in 1986 Senate Bill No. 777, is prohibited in all social and fraternal organizations, including the Shrine and the Elks Lodge. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 77-201; 1986 Senate Bill No. 777, L. 1986, Ch. 117, section 1.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-106

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-106 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Hazing, as defined in 1986 Senate Bill No. 777, is prohibited in all social and fraternal organizations, including the Shrine and the Elks Lodge. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 77-201; 1986 Senate Bill No. 777, L. 1986, Ch. 117, section 1.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-125

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-125 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
It is our opinion that advanced registered nurse practitioners may not issue prescription orders pursuant to a physician's standing orders or protocol because they have not been granted such authority by the statutes and regulations under which they are licensed. Physicians' assistants, however, are expressly authorized to practice medicine under the direction and supervision of a physician. Since the practice of medicine includes the act of prescribing medicine, we conclude that physicians' assistants may issue prescription orders under the direction and supervision of a physician. Cited herein: K.S.A. 65-1113(d), (g); 65-1626(t), (x), as amended by L. 1986, ch. 236, section 1; 65-2869(b); 65-2896e; 65-2897a(a), (c); K.A.R. 1985 Supp. 60-11-104; 60-11-105; 60-11-106.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-106

Attorney General Opinion No. 1984-106 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
As amended by chapter 282, section 5, the provisions of chapter 187, section 11 of the 1984 Session Laws prohibit the selling, giving or receiving of lists of names and addresses derived from public records, for the purpose of selling or offering for sale any property or service to the persons listed therein, subject to three exceptions. Section 6 of chapter 187, as amended by section 3 of chapter 282 of the 1984 Session Laws, further requires that any person who obtains a list of names and addresses certify that: (1) he or she will not use the information for the purpose of selling or offering for sale any property or services, and (2) will not give, sell or otherwise make available the list to another person so that the latter may sell or offer for sale any property or service. Accordingly, a person may not make commercial use of information derived from such lists, either directly or through the sale of the lists themselves. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 21-3913; 45-201 (both repealed, L. 1984, ch. 187); 74-2012, as amended by L. 1984, ch. 282, section l; L. 1983, ch. 171, section 11, L. 1984, ch. 187, sections 6, 11; L. 1984, ch. 282, sections 3, 5.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-138

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-138 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Under its police power, a state may reimburse itself for the cost of regulating and supervising a business by assessing the necessary expenses to the business which created the necessity for such regulation and supervision. Use of conservation fee fund monies for the prevention and cleanup of pollution from oil and gas activities regulated by the state corporation commission is sufficiently related to the regulatory function to make its use for such purposes a valid exercise of the police power. The conservation fee fund may be used to fund the study and cleanup of oil and gas pollution pursuant to section 37 of 1986 House Bill No. 3078 (K.S.A. 55-143, as amended by 1986, ch. 201, section 37), to the extent that such study and cleanup are reasonably related to those activities of the oil and gas industry which are regulated by the commission. Use of the conservation fee fund by the state corporation commission for those oil and gas activities it does not regulate (as authorized by K.S.A. 55-143, as amended by L. 1986, ch. 201, section 37, which references subsection (a)(2)(A)-of K.S.A. 65-171d, as amended by L. 1986, ch. 201. section 22), is contrary to the findings of the Kansas Supreme Court in P̲a̲n̲h̲a̲n̲d̲l̲e̲ ̲E̲a̲s̲t̲e̲r̲n̲ ̲P̲i̲p̲e̲l̲i̲n̲e̲ ̲v̲.̲ ̲F̲a̲d̲e̲l̲e̲y̲. Such use exacts revenue from the oil and gas industry under the guise of a regulatory fee in violation of article 11, section 1 of the Kansas Constitution, and the commerce clause and the Fourteenth Amendment of the United State Constitution. Cited herein: Kans. Const., Art. 11, section 1; U.S. Const., Fourteenth Amendment; K.S.A. 55-131; 55-143; 65-171d, as amended by L. 1986, ch. 33, section 10(f); L. 1986, ch. 201, sections 1, 2, 10, 17, 22, 28, 37, 39 and 40; and K.A.R. 28-41-1.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-162

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-162 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
K.S.A. 75-4319(b)(2) authorizes public bodies subject to the Kansas Open Meetings Act (KOMA) to recess into an executive session for the purpose of "consultation with an attorney for the body or agency which would be deemed privileged in the attorney-client relationship ..." The term "consultation" as used in the KOMA necessarily implies the presence of an attorney. Even though a letter from an attorney to his client containing advice is a privileged communication, we must conclude that members of a public body cannot recess into an executive session to review and discuss among themselves a letter from their attorney. Therefore, it is our opinion that the "consultation with an attorney" exception to the open meetings law cannot be invoked unless the attorney for the body is present. Cited herein: K.S.A. 60-426; 75-4317; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 75-4318(a); K.S.A. 75-4319.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-110

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-110 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
The intent of the Kansas statutes authorizing the mayor-council form of municipal government is that the office of mayor is separate and distinct from the members of the council. Under the Kansas Open Meetings Act a meeting is defined as a prearranged gathering of a majority of a quorum for the purpose of discussing the business of the governing body. A "majority of a quorum" is the smallest number of members of the governing body that can take official action. In accordance with the intent of the Kansas statutes and the purpose of the KOMA, we conclude that the "membership of the body" in a mayor-council form of municipal government does not include the mayor for purposes of determining the minimum number of persons that can constitute a meeting. Cited herein: K.S.A. 15-106; 15-201; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 15-204; K.S.A. 15-301; 15-310; 75-4317; 75-4317a.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-059

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-059 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Kansas laws pertaining to driving under the influence of alcohol allow conviction when the accused's blood or breath alcohol test (BAT) registers less than .10 as long as other supporting evidence is available. A conviction under a similar statute in another state may be considered for sentencing purposes. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 8-1005; 8-1567.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-148

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-148 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
A search warrant maybe issued by a district magistrate judge upon the sworn oral or written statement of a city attorney. Municipal law enforcement officers may execute such warrant, and property seized pursuant to the warrant may be admissible as evidence in a municipal court. However, K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 8-1001(f) precludes the use of a search warrant to obtain a blood sample from a person who has refused to submit to a blood, breath or urine test pursuant to that statute. An ordinance authorizing such procedure would be in conflict with the state statute prohibiting further testing after an informed refusal. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 8-1001, as amended by L. 1986, ch. 40, section 2; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 8-1005, as amended by L. 1986, ch. 41, section 1; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 8-1567(m); K.S.A. 12-4504; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 22-2202, as amended by L. 1986, ch. 133, section 1; K.S.A. 22-2502; 22-2503; 22-2507; L. 1986, ch. 40, section 1.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-056

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-056 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
The proceeds of revenue bonds issued under the provisions of K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 32-603 may be used for research and testing of water quality at the new state fish hatchery. Cited herein: K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 32-601, 32-603, 32-606.

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-161

Attorney General Opinion No. 1986-161 PDF Author: Robert T. Stephan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :

Get Book Here

Book Description
Any law enforcement officer may execute an arrest warrant within the officer's jurisdictions. Cited Herein: K.S.A. 19-812a; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 22-2202, as amended by L. 1986, ch. 133, 150; K.S.A. 22-2305; K.S.A. 1985 Supp. 22-2401a.