Aerodynamic Characteristics at Mach Numbers from 1.50 to 4.63 of a Variable-geometry Lifting Reentry Concept Employing Elevator and Body Base Flaps for Control

Aerodynamic Characteristics at Mach Numbers from 1.50 to 4.63 of a Variable-geometry Lifting Reentry Concept Employing Elevator and Body Base Flaps for Control PDF Author: Roger H. Fournier
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Space vehicles
Languages : en
Pages : 76

Get Book Here

Book Description
An investigation of a lifting body configuration has been conducted in the Langley Unitary Plan wind tunnel through a Mach number range from 1.50 to 4.63 to determine the control effectiveness characteristics of body base flaps with and without anhedral tail elevator controls.

Aerodynamic Characteristics at Mach Numbers from 1.50 to 4.63 of a Variable-geometry Lifting Reentry Concept Employing Elevator and Body Base Flaps for Control

Aerodynamic Characteristics at Mach Numbers from 1.50 to 4.63 of a Variable-geometry Lifting Reentry Concept Employing Elevator and Body Base Flaps for Control PDF Author: Roger H. Fournier
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Space vehicles
Languages : en
Pages : 76

Get Book Here

Book Description
An investigation of a lifting body configuration has been conducted in the Langley Unitary Plan wind tunnel through a Mach number range from 1.50 to 4.63 to determine the control effectiveness characteristics of body base flaps with and without anhedral tail elevator controls.

Longitudinal Aerodynamic Characteristics at Mach Numbers from 0.40 to 1.10 of a Blunted Right-trangular Pyramidal Lifting Reentry Configuration Employing Variable-sweep Wing Panels

Longitudinal Aerodynamic Characteristics at Mach Numbers from 0.40 to 1.10 of a Blunted Right-trangular Pyramidal Lifting Reentry Configuration Employing Variable-sweep Wing Panels PDF Author: Bernard Spencer
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Aerodynamic heating
Languages : en
Pages : 80

Get Book Here

Book Description


Aerodynamic Characteristics of Some Lifting Reentry Concepts Applicable to Transatmospheric Vehicle Design Studies

Aerodynamic Characteristics of Some Lifting Reentry Concepts Applicable to Transatmospheric Vehicle Design Studies PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 34

Get Book Here

Book Description


Longitudinal Aerodynamic Characteristics at Mach Numbers from 0.40 to 1.10 of a Blunted Right-trangular Pyramidal Lifting Reentry Configuration Employing Variable-sweep Wing Panels

Longitudinal Aerodynamic Characteristics at Mach Numbers from 0.40 to 1.10 of a Blunted Right-trangular Pyramidal Lifting Reentry Configuration Employing Variable-sweep Wing Panels PDF Author: Bernard Spencer
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0

Get Book Here

Book Description


Longitudinal Aerodynamic Characteristics at Mach Numbers from 0.50 to 1.19 of a Supersonic Transport Model with a Modified M Wing

Longitudinal Aerodynamic Characteristics at Mach Numbers from 0.50 to 1.19 of a Supersonic Transport Model with a Modified M Wing PDF Author: Edward J. Ray
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 84

Get Book Here

Book Description


Longitudinal and Lateral Aerodynamic Characteristics at Mach Numbers of 3.00, 3.96, and 4.65 of a Low-fineness-ratio Elliptical Hypersonic Configuration Having Variable-sweep Wing Panels

Longitudinal and Lateral Aerodynamic Characteristics at Mach Numbers of 3.00, 3.96, and 4.65 of a Low-fineness-ratio Elliptical Hypersonic Configuration Having Variable-sweep Wing Panels PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 44

Get Book Here

Book Description


Static Aerodynamic Characteristics at Mach Number from 1.50 to 4.63 of a Lifting Reentry Configuration Having Variable Sweep Wing

Static Aerodynamic Characteristics at Mach Number from 1.50 to 4.63 of a Lifting Reentry Configuration Having Variable Sweep Wing PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 112

Get Book Here

Book Description


Aerodynamic Characteristics at Mach Numbers of 1.5, 1.8, and 2.0 of a Blended Wing-body Configuration with and Without Integral Canards

Aerodynamic Characteristics at Mach Numbers of 1.5, 1.8, and 2.0 of a Blended Wing-body Configuration with and Without Integral Canards PDF Author: A. Warner Robins
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Hypersonic planes
Languages : en
Pages : 68

Get Book Here

Book Description


THE LONGITUDINAL AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A RE-ENTRY CONFIGURATION BASED ON A BLUNT 13 DEG HALF-CONE AT MACH NUMBERS TO 0.92

THE LONGITUDINAL AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS OF A RE-ENTRY CONFIGURATION BASED ON A BLUNT 13 DEG HALF-CONE AT MACH NUMBERS TO 0.92 PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 68

Get Book Here

Book Description


Aerodynamic Characteristics and Control Effectiveness of the HL-20 Lifting Body Configuration at Mach 10 in Air

Aerodynamic Characteristics and Control Effectiveness of the HL-20 Lifting Body Configuration at Mach 10 in Air PDF Author: William I. Scallion
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Airplanes
Languages : en
Pages : 62

Get Book Here

Book Description
A 0.0196-scale model of the HL-20 lifting body, one of several configurations proposed for future crewed spacecraft, was tested in the Langley 31-Inch Mach 10 Tunnel. The purpose of the tests was to determine the effectiveness of fin-mounted elevons, a lower surface flush-mounted body flap, and a flush-mounted yaw controller at hypersonic speeds. The nominal angle-of-attack range, representative of hypersonic entry, was 20 to 41 degrees, the sideslip angles were 0, 2, and -2 degrees, and the test Reynolds number was 1.06 x 10[factor 6] based on model reference length. The aerodynamic, longitudinal, and lateral control effectiveness along with surface oil flow visualizations are presented and discussed. The configuration was longitudinally and laterally stable at the nominal center of gravity. The primary longitudinal control, the fin-mounted elevons, could not trim the model to the desired entry angle of attack of 30 degrees. The lower surface body flaps were effective for roll control and the associated adverse yawing moment was eliminated by skewing the body flap hinge lines. A yaw controller, flush-mounted on the lower surface, was also effective, and the associated small rolling moment was favorable.