A Study of Job Evaluation Criteria for USAF 0-6 Positions PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download A Study of Job Evaluation Criteria for USAF 0-6 Positions PDF full book. Access full book title A Study of Job Evaluation Criteria for USAF 0-6 Positions by Paul D. D. Houppert (CAPT, USAF.). Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Paul D. D. Houppert (CAPT, USAF.)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Job evaluation
Languages : en
Pages : 280
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Paul D. D. Houppert (CAPT, USAF.)
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Job evaluation
Languages : en
Pages : 280
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Joseph M. Madden
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Job analysis
Languages : en
Pages : 72
Get Book Here
Book Description
"This report summarizes the history of job evaluation and gives a critical review of the technical literature as a background for the Air Force job evaluation plan. The Air Force plan is described with the rationale for each phase. A discussion of unsolved problems includes an outline of research needed to discover solutions of these problems. An Appendix lists a 200-item bibliography with abstracts." -- page iii.
Author: Raymond E. Christal
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Job analysis
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Francis D. Harding
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Job analysis
Languages : en
Pages : 18
Get Book Here
Book Description
The job evaluation system used by the Air Force was applied to a sample of positions. Judged by pay-grade conversions, evaluation scores obtained were somewhat inflated, but the evaluations discriminated between higher and lower skilled jobs. A simple average of individual ratings closely approximates the consensus ratings arrived at during two-man conferences held by the judges. This finding eliminates the reason for limiting the number of judges to the small number who can attend such meetings. By means of regression analysis it was found that factors dealing with Knowledge, Adaptability and Resourcefulness, and Attention formed one group related factors while the factors measuring Responsibility for Safety of Others, Physical Effort, and Job Conditions were related to each other. Although there was overlap within the two groups each factor had a considerable amount of unique variance.
Author: Raymond E. Christal
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Job evaluation
Languages : en
Pages : 14
Get Book Here
Book Description
A significant association between the familiarity of the rater with a job and the ratings he assigns to the job was found for 17 of 50 Air Force specialties. Assuming that the most valid ratings are those given by highly familiar raters, it appears that highly technical jobs tend to be under-evaluated by raters who are unfamiliar with the work performed. On the other hand, some jobs ten to be over-evaluated by raters who are unfamiliar with the work performed. These findings point to the necessity for controlling the level of familiarity when job evaluation is conducted.
Author: Joseph M. Madden
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 24
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Raymond E. Christal
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Job evaluation
Languages : en
Pages : 36
Get Book Here
Book Description
Reliabilities of single ratings and pooled ratings of Air Force job evaluation factors were estimated from ratings on 50 Air Force specialties by student officers attending the Command and Staff School. The Spearman-Brown prophecy formula was found to produce reliability estimates which were practically identical to those obtained by randomly drawing samples and computing the reliability for each one. The inter-rater and rate-rerate reliability of the Air Force job evaluation system was found to be adequate when the composites were based upon an average of the ratings made by 10 to 15 officers at the USAF Command and Staff School. The reliability of such mean ratings did not rise appreciably as the number of raters was increased beyond 20. When the basis of rating was a full-length job description, the raters tended to assign higher values than when they based their ratings on a brief Specialty Summary. However, the rank ordering of the specialties remained essentially unchanged. Reliability of the ratings was approximately the same whether long or short job descriptions were used.
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 64
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Leland D. Brokaw
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Job evaluation
Languages : en
Pages : 40
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Joseph Matthew Madden
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Context effects (Psychology)
Languages : en
Pages : 44
Get Book Here
Book Description
Judgments may be distorted by a variety of influences. One potent influence is the context in which the object judged is place. When a list of jobs is being evaluated in a job-evaluation program, each job is presented to the rater in the context of all the remaining jobs on the list. This study demonstrates that jobs may be listed together in such a way as to seriously bias evaluation scores. When a list is composed of all high-value jobs, the obtained evaluation scores were lower than the "true" ones. When a list was composed of all low-value jobs, the evaluation scores were higher. On lists containing a majority of high-value jobs, the low-value jobs were judged even lower; and the reverse was true when the list contained a majority of low-value jobs. Other types of context effects were also observed. Suggestions were made for the control of context effects in the Air Force job-evaluation program.
