Author: Theodore E. Anderson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 257
Book Description
A Computer Simulation Model of Driver Behavior at Intersections. Urban Intersection Study -
Author: Theodore E. Anderson
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 257
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 257
Book Description
Urban Intersection Study: A computer simulation model of driver behavior at intersections, by T. E. Anderson, E. A. Kidd and K. R. Laughery
Author: Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory. Transportation Research Department
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Automobile drivers
Languages : en
Pages : 556
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Automobile drivers
Languages : en
Pages : 556
Book Description
A Computer Simulation Model of Driver Behavior at Intersections
Author: Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Automobile drivers
Languages : en
Pages : 218
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Automobile drivers
Languages : en
Pages : 218
Book Description
Development and Use of a Computer Simulation Model for the Evaluation of Design and Control Alternatives for Intersections of Minor Roads with Multi-lane Rural Highways
Author: Radwan A. E.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 74
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 74
Book Description
Highway Safety Literature
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Highway research
Languages : en
Pages : 966
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Highway research
Languages : en
Pages : 966
Book Description
Urban Intersection Study: Summary report, by Kenneth R. Laughery and Edwin A. Kidd
Author: Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory. Transportation Research Department
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Automobile drivers
Languages : en
Pages : 136
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Automobile drivers
Languages : en
Pages : 136
Book Description
Highway Safety Literature
Author: United States. National Highway Safety Bureau
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Traffic safety
Languages : en
Pages : 148
Book Description
One of a 5-volume set, each covering a broad subject, which cumulates annually all citations that appeared during the year in: Highway safety literature.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Traffic safety
Languages : en
Pages : 148
Book Description
One of a 5-volume set, each covering a broad subject, which cumulates annually all citations that appeared during the year in: Highway safety literature.
Highway Safety Literature Annual Cumulation ...
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Traffic accidents
Languages : en
Pages : 748
Book Description
One of a 5-volume set, each covering a broad subject, which cumulates annually all citations that appeared during the year in: Highway safety literature. In present volume, annotated entries arranged under emergency services, injuries, investigations and records, and locations. No index.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Traffic accidents
Languages : en
Pages : 748
Book Description
One of a 5-volume set, each covering a broad subject, which cumulates annually all citations that appeared during the year in: Highway safety literature. In present volume, annotated entries arranged under emergency services, injuries, investigations and records, and locations. No index.
Traffic Systems Reviews and Abstracts
Author: United States. Federal Highway Administration
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Traffic engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 782
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Traffic engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 782
Book Description
Analysis and Modeling of Drivers' Responses at Urban Signalized Intersections
Author: Brian T. W. Lin
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 121
Book Description
This study provided baseline data on how subjects approached intersections to support a follow-on study of augmented reality crash warnings. Twenty-four licensed drivers (12 ages 18-30, 12 greater than age 65) drove through 71 urban, signalized intersections in a fixed-base driving simulator while following a lead vehicle. Five types of conflicts were simulated at 10 intersections, straight crossing path (SCP), left turn across path - opposite direction (LTAP/OD), left turn across path - lateral direction (LTAP/LD), left turn into path (LTIP), and right turn into path (RTIP). The probability of stopping at yellow light was = ex/(1+ex), where x = -5.84 - 0.01*gap to stop line + 1.49*yellow light timing - 2.93*pedal position + 0.29*age + 0.15*gender, accounting for 19% of the variance because of individual differences. Subject vehicle approach speed to the intersection varied by conflict type and traffic light color and timing. When approaching a green light, 21% of subjects slowed down for LTAP/OD conflicts and 27% slowed down for RTIP. For yellow lights, when subjects chose to run light, they never slowed down for LTAP/OD. The approach speed to an intersection was = 13.70 - 0.17*gap to stop line - 5.38*run or not + 0.07*conflict or not + 3.21*yellow light timing 2.8 s - 0.18*yellow light timing 3.5 s - 1.58*age, with an R2 of 0.74.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 121
Book Description
This study provided baseline data on how subjects approached intersections to support a follow-on study of augmented reality crash warnings. Twenty-four licensed drivers (12 ages 18-30, 12 greater than age 65) drove through 71 urban, signalized intersections in a fixed-base driving simulator while following a lead vehicle. Five types of conflicts were simulated at 10 intersections, straight crossing path (SCP), left turn across path - opposite direction (LTAP/OD), left turn across path - lateral direction (LTAP/LD), left turn into path (LTIP), and right turn into path (RTIP). The probability of stopping at yellow light was = ex/(1+ex), where x = -5.84 - 0.01*gap to stop line + 1.49*yellow light timing - 2.93*pedal position + 0.29*age + 0.15*gender, accounting for 19% of the variance because of individual differences. Subject vehicle approach speed to the intersection varied by conflict type and traffic light color and timing. When approaching a green light, 21% of subjects slowed down for LTAP/OD conflicts and 27% slowed down for RTIP. For yellow lights, when subjects chose to run light, they never slowed down for LTAP/OD. The approach speed to an intersection was = 13.70 - 0.17*gap to stop line - 5.38*run or not + 0.07*conflict or not + 3.21*yellow light timing 2.8 s - 0.18*yellow light timing 3.5 s - 1.58*age, with an R2 of 0.74.