A Comparison of Field and in Vitro Screening Methods for Drought Resistance in Sorghum Bicolor (L.) Moench PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download A Comparison of Field and in Vitro Screening Methods for Drought Resistance in Sorghum Bicolor (L.) Moench PDF full book. Access full book title A Comparison of Field and in Vitro Screening Methods for Drought Resistance in Sorghum Bicolor (L.) Moench by Leonard William Panella. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Leonard William Panella
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Sorghum
Languages : en
Pages : 226
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Leonard William Panella
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Sorghum
Languages : en
Pages : 226
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Sandeep Singh Tomar
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Grain mold (GM) is an important biotic constraint limiting yield and market value of sorghum grains. It results in kernel discoloration and deterioration. Such kernels have reduced seed viability, low food and feed quality. Breeding for grain mold resistance is challenging because of the complex nature of host-pathogen-environment interactions. This complex task could be made simpler by utilizing molecular markers. Utilization of marker resources may help to find genomic regions associated with grain mold resistance. In this study, three sets of field and laboratory based experiments were performed which will help in finding potential grain mold pathogens responsible for kernel deterioration in the studied environment and search for genotypes with better kernel quality and grain mold resistance. In the first part of the study, in vitro screening of 44 grain mold resistant sorghum genotypes developed and released by Texas A & M AgriLife Research. This study was aimed at identifying sources resistance to grain mold infection through laboratory screening. The result revealed that genotypes Tx3371, Tx3373, Tx3374, Tx3376, Tx3407, Tx3400, and Tx3402 were have high level of resistance and were identified as potential sources of grain mold resistance as each showed minimal fungal infection and higher grain quality traits. The second experiment was performed to optimize surface sterilization protocol for the extraction of fungal pathogens from the kernel surface (pericarp) and to study the effect of bleach percentage and time period on pathogen extraction. Seven treatments using sterilized double distilled water (0 % bleach (v/v)) and different bleach (NaOCl) concentrations (2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5 and 15 %) were used with a time interval of 2.5, 5, 7.5 and 10 min. Optimized surface sterilization in the range of 7.5 to 15 % bleach (v/v) for 7.5 to 10 min resulted least contamination and fungal genera isolation from the surface of the kernel. The third study was aimed at characterizing genotypes (sorghum association panel) for grain mold pathogen F. thapsinum and by using genome wide association (GWA) tool in order to find genomic regions associated with grain mold resistance. We studied the effect of different agronomic and panicle architecture traits on grain mold incidence and severity. Effects of grain mold on kernel quality traits were also studied. We reported two loci associated with grain mold resistance. Based on first year field screening results, 46 genotypes having grain mold ratings 1-5 (1 = 1% panicle kernel molded; 5 = 50% panicle kernel molded) were selected for a detailed study aimed at understanding grain mold x fungal pathogen interactions to physical and chemical kernel traits. Seed germination test, vigor index, and tetrazolium viability test were performed to study effect of grain mold infection on kernel viability and vigor. Alternaria, Fusarium thapsinum, F. verticillioides and F. proliferatum were the main fungal genera isolated from bisected kernels. Based on two year screening, SC623, SC67, SC621, SC947 and SC1494 were most resistant based on both PGMR and TGMR rating while SC370, SC833, SC1484, and SC1077 showed the most susceptible reaction and this was consistent for individual location analysis. SC309, SC213, SC833, SC971 and SC1047 are genotypes having identified loci for grain mold resistance.
Author: F. W. G. Baker
Publisher: C.A.B. International
ISBN:
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 248
Get Book Here
Book Description
![Field and Laboratory Screening of Sorghum [Sorghum Bicolor (L.) Moench.] Genotypes for Seed Deterioration PDF](https://books.google.com/books/content/images/frontcover/EM7tNwAACAAJ?fife=w80-h100)
Author: Ahmed Abdel Aziz
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Sorghum
Languages : en
Pages : 286
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: USAID Title XII Collaborative Research Support Program on Sorghum and Pearl Millet
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Millets
Languages : en
Pages : 244
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Biology
Languages : en
Pages : 632
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Vincent Babatunde Ogunlela
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 186
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Iowa. State College, Cedar Falls
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Humanities
Languages : en
Pages : 634
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: William Joseph Majerus
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 138
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Grant Anthony Groene
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Drought is the single most limiting factor in crop production. This study was conducted to investigate if a cell viability assay could serve as an effective, efficient screen to determine post-anthesis drought tolerance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench) and maize (Zea mays [L]). The assay measured decline in chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm) over time from leaf punches collected from plants grown under optimum environmental conditions and placed in an incubator under high respiratory demand. A total of 300 lines of sorghum and 197 lines of maize were screened using this assay and potential post flowering drought tolerant staygreen lines and non-stay green lines were identified. Further testing of potential lines was done in both controlled and field environments, under drought conditions, to evaluate genotype performance for physiological, yield, and staygreen traits. Standard known staygreen and non-staygreen checks were also included in these studies for comparisons. Some relationships existed between results from the cell viability assay and performance measures under controlled environment and field conditions for both sorghum and corn. However, controlled experiments were limited due to space and time constraints, and field experiments were limited due to an absence of drought during the growing season. These studies showed that the staygreen trait was not clear in the known standards under controlled environment conditions. Few of the selected lines performed better under field condition. Further testing needs to be conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a cell viability assay as a feasible indicator of drought tolerance. Experiments under field conditions at different locations and with more replications would be necessary to evaluate relations between cell viability assay and expression of drought tolerance in field conditions.
