Petition for a Writ of Certiorari PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Petition for a Writ of Certiorari PDF full book. Access full book title Petition for a Writ of Certiorari by William Kinney. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: William Kinney
Publisher: Independently Published
ISBN: 9781794120723
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 108
Get Book Here
Book Description
This Petition is being presented to the United States Supreme Court in order to challenge Tennessee's law for the unlicensed practice of law (UPL). During several hearings held at the Blount County Circuit Court, the Honorable David R. Duggan presiding, threatened the Petitioners (William and Margaret Kinney) with criminal prosecution under UPL for defending their marital liberty and property rights. William and Margaret have been married for 43 years, and are one person in the eyes of God, and in law, and cannot be silenced in open court under the pretense of UPL. They sued the respondents in federal court for deprivation of their civil and equal rights. What followed next was an outrageous violation of their First Amendment right to Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Religion by the Blount County Court, Tennessee's Appellate Court, Tennessee's Supreme Court, the U.S. District Court in Knoxville, TN, and the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. If these courts, which are empowered by the people to protect our rights, can violate those rights with impunity, the principles of liberty and freedom that made this country great - are dead.
Author: William Kinney
Publisher: Independently Published
ISBN: 9781794120723
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 108
Get Book Here
Book Description
This Petition is being presented to the United States Supreme Court in order to challenge Tennessee's law for the unlicensed practice of law (UPL). During several hearings held at the Blount County Circuit Court, the Honorable David R. Duggan presiding, threatened the Petitioners (William and Margaret Kinney) with criminal prosecution under UPL for defending their marital liberty and property rights. William and Margaret have been married for 43 years, and are one person in the eyes of God, and in law, and cannot be silenced in open court under the pretense of UPL. They sued the respondents in federal court for deprivation of their civil and equal rights. What followed next was an outrageous violation of their First Amendment right to Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Religion by the Blount County Court, Tennessee's Appellate Court, Tennessee's Supreme Court, the U.S. District Court in Knoxville, TN, and the Sixth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. If these courts, which are empowered by the people to protect our rights, can violate those rights with impunity, the principles of liberty and freedom that made this country great - are dead.
Author: William Warren Irwin
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Annotations and citations (Law)
Languages : en
Pages : 276
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Supreme Court
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Age discrimination in employment
Languages : en
Pages : 60
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Douglas Edwin Pierce
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Sentences (Criminal procedure)
Languages : en
Pages : 62
Get Book Here
Book Description
Question presented: Should this Court resolve the three-way conflict among seven circuits over whether a federal judge can require a defendant to serve a term of imprisonment consecutively to another sentence that has not yet been imposed?
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 28
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 30
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Samuel H. Sloan
Publisher: Ishi Press
ISBN: 9784871873819
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 54
Get Book Here
Book Description
Petitioner Respectfully Prays that a Writ of Certiorari issue to the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, First Department to review the decision of the Supreme Court of the State of New York dated August 9, 2013, Index No. 101087/2013, and the decision of the Appellate Division, First Department of the Supreme Court of the State of New York dated August 13, 2013 which denied the validation petition of the above candidates to be reinstated on the ballot after these candidates were removed from the ballot solely because their petition signatures had not been witnessed by enrolled Republicans. On August 21, 2013, the Court of Appeals of the State of New York denied the motion by Petitioner for Leave to Appeal to the New York Court of Appeals. The Candidate-Petitioners and their supporters circulated petitions to be placed on the ballot. Petitions containing more than 4500 signatures were timely filed by "Cindarella Time" which was midnight on July 11, 2013. As this filing was facially valid, petitioner-candidates were placed on the ballot. However, a General Objection was by one Sal Caruso was filed on July 15, 2013 followed by a Specific Objection on July 22, 2013. A hearing was held before the New York Board of Elections on July 30, 2013 following which these candidates were kicked off the ballot on July 31, 2013 for one reason only which was 3905 of these signatures had not been witnessed by enrolled members of the Republican Party. Rather the signatures had been witnessed by other voters including Democrats, Libertarians and Blanks. Petitioners filed a petition to validate their places on the ballot on August 1, 2013. A show cause order was issued requiring the objector and the Board of Elections to appear on August 5, 2013. On August 9, 2013 Judge Wooten denied the Validation Petition without opinion. Petitioner appealed and this appeal was heard by the New York supreme Court Appellate Division First Department which affirmed the decision of the Supreme Court without opinion. Petitioner then filed a motion for leavbe to appeal with the Court of appeals of New York. This was denied on August 21, 2013. This petition for Certiorari follows. This proceeding is brought under Election Law Sections 16-100 and 16-102 and other provisions of New York Law. Sam Sloan is a candidate for Mayor of the City of New York. Richard Bozulich is a candidate for Comptroller of the City of New York. Thomas R. Stevens is a candidate for Public Advocate of the City of New York. Supporters of the candidates circulated petitions and the requisite number of signatures were obtained to get on the ballot. The signed petitions were timely submitted to the Board of Elections in the City of New York. The Petitions complied in every respect with the election rules, including cover sheets and wording of the petitions. There were enough signatures, the cover sheet was done properly and the wording of the petition was correct. However, on July 31, 2013, all three of these candidates were thrown off the ballot after a hearing by the New York City Board of Elections for one reason only, which was that these were designating petitions for the Republican Party Primary, and the subscribing witnesses (not the signers) were not registered as Republicans with the New York City Board of Elections.
