Author: the late Bernard Schwartz
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0195363914
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 497
Get Book Here
Book Description
A companion to Oxford's The Unpublished Opinions of the Warren Court, this book contains the draft opinions that were prepared by the Justices in the cases included, as well as a short historical preface of each case and an analysis of the legal events occurring after the drafts were sent to the Justices.
Author: Bernard Schwartz
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
ISBN: 0195053176
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 497
Get Book Here
Book Description
A companion to Oxford's The Unpublished Opinions of the Warren Court, this book contains the draft opinions that were prepared by the Justices in the cases included, as well as a short historical preface of each case and an analysis of the legal events occurring after the drafts were sent to the Justices.
Author: Bernard Schwartz
Publisher: Doubleday Books
ISBN:
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 322
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Bob Woodward
Publisher: Simon and Schuster
ISBN: 1439126348
Category : Political Science
Languages : en
Pages : 717
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Brethren is the first detailed behind-the-scenes account of the Supreme Court in action. Bob Woodward and Scott Armstrong have pierced its secrecy to give us an unprecedented view of the Chief and Associate Justices—maneuvering, arguing, politicking, compromising, and making decisions that affect every major area of American life.
Author: Charles M. Lamb
Publisher: University of Illinois Press
ISBN: 9780252061356
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 532
Get Book Here
Book Description
This volume offers valuable insights into the thirteen justices who served on the Supreme Court while Warren E. Burger was chief justice, from 1969 to 1986. Each chapter focuses on one of the thirteen, beginning with a brief introduction and biographical sketch and then analyzing the individual justice's contributions to major areas and issues of constitutional law.
Author: Bernard Schwartz
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
ISBN: 0195118006
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 290
Get Book Here
Book Description
Discusses the Supreme Court's decision making process, based on documentary sources and interviews with justices and law clerks. Provides insight into some of the most important cases to come before the court and includes portraits of many of the justices in action.
Author: the late Bernard Schwartz
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0195365208
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 483
Get Book Here
Book Description
An important contribution to constitutional literature, this collection of ten unpublished decisions by the Warren Court puts the decision making process of the Supreme Court in a new light. By following the major changes that occur in each case from the circulation of tentative majority opinions to the final issuance of opinion, the book portrays how the justices communicate with each other and how they are influenced by each other's arguments. Interpretations and commentaries by the author illuminate the significance of each case and provide insight into the different judicial philosophies and personal styles of the justices. This book will be of substantial value to law schools, law libraries, bar associations, and lawyers practicing in the field of constitutional law.
Author: Bernard Schwartz
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
ISBN: 0195093321
Category : Judicial opinions
Languages : en
Pages : 501
Get Book Here
Book Description
Schwartz provides the draft opinions prepared by Justices in key cases during the Rehnquist Court, together with short histories, commentaries, and analyses of what happened once the drafts were circulated.
Author: Bernard Schwartz
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
ISBN: 0195035631
Category : Judicial opinions
Languages : en
Pages : 483
Get Book Here
Book Description
An important contribution to constitutional literature, this collection of ten unpublished decisions by the Warren Court puts the decision making process of the Supreme Court in a new light. By following the major changes that occur in each case from the circulation of tentative majority opinions to the final issuance of opinion, the book portrays how the justices communicate with each other and how they are influenced by each other's arguments. Interpretations and commentaries by the author illuminate the significance of each case and provide insight into the different judicial philosophies and personal styles of the justices. This book will be of substantial value to law schools, law libraries, bar associations, and lawyers practicing in the field of constitutional law.
Author: Conrado Hübner Mendes
Publisher: OUP Oxford
ISBN: 019165017X
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 1057
Get Book Here
Book Description
Contemporary democracies have granted an expansive amount of power to unelected judges that sit in constitutional or supreme courts. This power shift has never been easily squared with the institutional backbones through which democracy is popularly supposed to be structured. The best institutional translation of a 'government of the people, by the people and for the people' is usually expressed through elections and electoral representation in parliaments. Judicial review of legislation has been challenged as bypassing that common sense conception of democratic rule. The alleged 'democratic deficit' behind what courts are legally empowered to do has been met with a variety of justifications in favour of judicial review. One common justification claims that constitutional courts are, in comparison to elected parliaments, much better suited for impartial deliberation and public reason-giving. Fundamental rights would thus be better protected by that insulated mode of decision-making. This justification has remained largely superficial and, sometimes, too easily embraced. This book analyses the argument that the legitimacy of courts arises from their deliberative capacity. It examines the theory of political deliberation and its implications for institutional design. Against this background, it turns to constitutional review and asks whether an argument can be made in support of judicial power on the basis of deliberative theory.
