The Polluter Pays Principle and Its Ascendancy in Climate Change Law PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download The Polluter Pays Principle and Its Ascendancy in Climate Change Law PDF full book. Access full book title The Polluter Pays Principle and Its Ascendancy in Climate Change Law by Alexander Zahar. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Alexander Zahar
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 52
Get Book Here
Book Description
Under the international agreements on climate change, states have a responsibility to mitigate their greenhouse gas emissions. We may refer to this as an “obligation to regulate”. This article argues that the general, treaty-derived obligation to regulate is supplemented by a separate legal principle on how to regulate: the principle that the polluter must pay. The obligation to arrest greenhouse gas emissions through regulation necessarily comes at a cost to states and individuals, as any regulation does. But the general obligation to regulate does not contain any guidance on who should bear the costs of regulation and under what circumstances. This is where the polluter pays principle comes in. In its legal instantiation, it is a principle of justice. It requires polluters, both states and individuals, to pay, because it is not fair that they assume unlimited access to the atmospheric commons. Yet, as a principle of justice, the polluter pays principle must itself be implemented fairly. Not every polluter should be made to pay, or pay the same amount, indiscriminately, or without support, if that would cause another, even greater, unfairness. Thus the polluter pays principle serves as a guide to how the general obligation of states to regulate is to be implemented.
Author: Alexander Zahar
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 52
Get Book Here
Book Description
Under the international agreements on climate change, states have a responsibility to mitigate their greenhouse gas emissions. We may refer to this as an “obligation to regulate”. This article argues that the general, treaty-derived obligation to regulate is supplemented by a separate legal principle on how to regulate: the principle that the polluter must pay. The obligation to arrest greenhouse gas emissions through regulation necessarily comes at a cost to states and individuals, as any regulation does. But the general obligation to regulate does not contain any guidance on who should bear the costs of regulation and under what circumstances. This is where the polluter pays principle comes in. In its legal instantiation, it is a principle of justice. It requires polluters, both states and individuals, to pay, because it is not fair that they assume unlimited access to the atmospheric commons. Yet, as a principle of justice, the polluter pays principle must itself be implemented fairly. Not every polluter should be made to pay, or pay the same amount, indiscriminately, or without support, if that would cause another, even greater, unfairness. Thus the polluter pays principle serves as a guide to how the general obligation of states to regulate is to be implemented.
Author: Alexander Zahar
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 15
Get Book Here
Book Description
In a 2010 paper Feng and Buhi suggested that the Copenhagen Accord of 2009 had demoted the principle of common but differentiated responsibility and “silently” elevated the polluter-pays principle to a dominant position in international climate law. As evidence they cited the fact that some non-Annex I parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, including China, had taken positions previously associated only with Annex I parties, in particular on the provision of climate finance to (other) developing countries. Now, eight years later, with the Paris Agreement erected on the conceptual foundation of the Copenhagen Accord, I ask whether the Feng-Buhi hypothesis has gained plausibility. Certainly, the Paris Agreement obliges states to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions more than they would have otherwise. It thereby obliges them to incur a cost, or pay a price, for those emissions mitigated because of the Agreement. In this sense, states are under an obligation to price at least some of their emissions. (The general rule holds even if we exclude the United States and those less wealthy countries whose domestic mitigation effort may not be affected by the Agreement in the short term.) Other elements of the Agreement, detailed in this paper, also signify a treaty-led elevation of the polluter-pays principle in the climate change regime. Has it now therefore gained a legal foothold in the regime, if only implicitly? An alternative narrative is that the parties to the Agreement have agreed to reduce their emissions in response to, not any legal imperative, but what we might call the physical necessity of avoiding global warming of 2°C or above. A stronger counter-narrative points to certain political sensitivities that conspire to keep the polluter-pays principle's ascendancy quiet, if not entirely “silent”. In practice, however, as I argue, the principle is increasingly being recognized as delivering a positive obligation for states to act. The logical endpoint of this progressive development of the law is that every “polluter-state” is to accept that the emission of greenhouse gases in its territory must come at a cost to the state, as a matter of law. An emerging legal compulsion to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by pricing them is not to be made light of in a field that is almost devoid of substantive law. Open acceptance of the principle may help to speed up and deepen the global response to climate change.
Author: Patrick Kimuyu
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
ISBN: 3668649278
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 12
Get Book Here
Book Description
Polemic Paper from the year 2018 in the subject Politics - Environmental Policy, grade: 1.3, Egerton University, language: English, abstract: It is evident that the environment is experiencing immense consequences from the impact of pollution. One of the most challenging issues related to the degradation of the environment owing to pollution is the phenomenon of climate change. Climate change explains the adverse effects of environmental degradation and pollution is the principal cause of this life-threatening phenomenon. Despite the remarkable progress achieved in combating environmental pollution through environmental policy approaches, there is a need for climate justice in which the polluter will be held responsible for the damage caused to the environment. In theory, this is the approach of the so-called Polluter Pays Principle. This approach appears relevant in addressing issues related to environmentally-mediated to humans. Despite the endless debate on issues of morality and justice, especially in America, the tenets of climate justice should be upheld by enforcing environmental policies that require the polluter to pay. Therefore, this argumentative essay will present an array of aspects that explain why the polluter should pay. It will discuss property rights, economic efficiency, tradable permits, and provide the means on how polluters can pay.
Author: Peter H. Howard
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Miriam Haritz
Publisher: Kluwer Law International B.V.
ISBN: 9041135219
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 490
Get Book Here
Book Description
"This vitally important book asks: Can the precautionary principle make uncertainty judiciable in the context of liability for the consequences of climate change, and, if so, to what extent? Drawing on the full range of pertinent existing literature and case law, the author examines the precautionary principle both in terms of its content and application and in the context of liability law. She analyses the indirect means offered by existing legislation being used by environmental groups and affected individuals before the courts to challenge both companies and regulators as responsible agents of climate change damage"--Page 4 of cover.
Author: Paul Barresi
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Polluter Pays Principle made its international debut in 1972 in a recommendation by the Council of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ("OECD") to OECD Member States on the international aspects of environmental policies. Fifteen years later, the World Commission on Environment and Development recognized it as an economic strategy for achieving sustainable development. The Polluter Pays Principle requires polluters to bear the costs of the pollution prevention and control measures imposed by public authorities to achieve or to maintain an acceptable level of environmental quality, including the costs of environmental restoration measures, with certain narrowly defined exceptions. Its goals are to encourage the rational use and better allocation of scarce environmental resources and to avoid distortions in international trade and investment by ensuring that the costs of goods and services that cause pollution when produced or consumed reflect the costs of the pollution prevention and control measures required by public authorities. If the Polluter Pays Principle is to achieve its goals globally, then it must be adopted and implemented effectively by a critical mass of States, especially the States with the world's biggest economies or that stand out for the size of their current or likely future contributions to global environmental challenges such as anthropogenic climate change. India, China, and the United States all fall within this special group. The international harmonization of the adoption and implementation of the Polluter Pays Principle in the environmental law and policy regimes of these three States remains elusive, however, which substantially undermines its goals globally. In India, the Union Government identified the Polluter Pays Principle as an essential vehicle for integrating environmental considerations into government decision-making more than twenty years ago. It took the Indian Supreme Court, however, in a characteristically activist move, to recognize the principle as a part of Indian law a few years later, albeit in expanded form. Unfortunately, the polluters in the seminal case succeeded in delaying the execution of the Court's final judgment for fifteen years, which highlights how India's unique legal culture and institutions can be as much a hindrance as a help in ensuring that even the Indian variant of the Polluter Pays Principle is implemented effectively. In China, the Central Government has derived from the Polluter Pays Principle the principle of "who pollutes, who treats," which purportedly serves as one of the pillars of China's environmental law and policy regime. As implemented, the pollution discharge fee system that China has developed to operationalize this derivative expands the Polluter Pays Principle in some respects, but contracts it in others, the net effect being to neutralize its effectiveness as a sustainable development strategy. Essential elements of the Chinese legal tradition, as well as an institutionalized devolution of power from the Central Government to local governments in recent decades, which has mobilized cultural norms of behavior at the local level, have played crucial roles in producing this result. In the United States, neither the Federal Government's principal pollution control statutes nor the federal statute that declares a national environmental policy claim to embrace the Polluter Pays Principle per se. Moreover, to the extent that the U.S. environmental law and policy regime embraces the principle implicitly, it also does so inconsistently. The institutional fragmentation of the federal law- and policy-making process, in which special interest groups in civil society play an especially influential role, has produced an environmental law and policy regime that exempts certain types of pollution from some of its most important requirements for reasons that undermine the spirit, if not the letter, of the Polluter Pays Principle. The rise of traditional conservatism as a potent political force nationally in recent decades has helped to perpetuate, if not to exacerbate, this result. As the examples of India, China, and the United States suggest, harmonizing the adoption and implementation of the Polluter Pays Principle as a global sustainable development strategy in a critical mass of States is at least as much a political and legal challenge as an economic one, even taking into account the special economic circumstances of less developed countries. The political and legal constraints that have blocked this harmonization to date are State-specific, and have both institutional and cultural dimensions. The most likely prescription for overcoming these constraints is sustainability leadership, not in the form of mere calls for economic rationality or the mustering of political will, but in the form of the acquisition and deployment of the institutional and cultural knowledge and skills needed to work each of the relevant municipal law- and policy-making and Implementation systems strategically in order to achieve the desired result.
Author: Rabbi Deloso
Publisher: GRIN Verlag
ISBN: 3656083975
Category : Nature
Languages : en
Pages : 51
Get Book Here
Book Description
Master's Thesis from the year 2006 in the subject Environmental Sciences, grade: merit, Lund University (LUMES), language: English, abstract: The precautionary principle is an old concept with a new character. Threats of harm, since the early days of civilization, were confronted by taking some form of precaution. Throughout history, the concept of precaution provided humans with the moral right to avoid potential harm or damage to his health and his environment despite lack of certainty of its occurrence. Today, the precautionary principle is a common legal concept in national and international regulatory policies. In a nutshell, it means that if there is threat or risk of serious or irreversible damage to human health or the environment, precautionary actions must be taken even though there is lack of full certainty surrounding the issue. This paper looks at the concept of precaution in the framework of international law. The precautionary principle is particularly applied in the current global effort to address climate change. Despite many uncertainties about the science and impacts of the global warming phenomenon, leaders of the global community, adopted the precautionary principle, instead of the traditional reactive wait-and-see approach, in the climate regime. Although criticized by many for its shortcomings and its marginal position in the practical sense, this paper looks at the legal validity of the precautionary principle based on its sources, rather than its merits. In other words, this thesis looks at the concept of precaution and examines it in the lens of the contemporary international legal system. The first part of this thesis endeavours to understand better the precautionary principle under international conventional law. Influenced by systems approach, this paper particularly analyzed the principle’s relevance with the climate change issue. Guided by the legal positivist approach, the first part argues that the precautionary principle is a significant doctrine in international conventional law. The thesis also examines the precautionary principle in the context of international customary law. Keywords: precautionary principle, climate change, treaties, uncertainty, customary international law
Author: Alexander Zahar
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 16
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Paris Agreement obliges states to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions more than they would have otherwise. It thereby obliges them to incur a cost, or pay a price, for those emissions mitigated because of the Agreement. In this sense, states are under an obligation to price at least some of their emissions. The general rule holds even if we exclude the United States (which has announced its withdrawal from the Agreement) and those less wealthy countries whose domestic mitigation effort may not be affected by the Agreement in the short term. Other elements of the Agreement, detailed in this article, also signify a treaty-led elevation of the polluter-pays principle in the climate change regime. I argue that the principle is increasingly being recognized as creating a positive obligation on states to act. The logical endpoint of this progressive development of the law is that every “polluter state” must accept that it will incur a cost for the emission of greenhouse gases in its territory, as a matter of law. An emerging international legal compulsion to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by pricing them is not to be made light of in a field that is almost devoid of substantive law. Recognition of the principle's legal weight may help to speed up and deepen the global response to climate change.
Author: Giedr? Kaminskait?-Salters
Publisher: Kluwer Law International B.V.
ISBN: 9041132538
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 242
Get Book Here
Book Description
The issue of tortious liability for harm caused by climate change has risen to some prominence in recent legal literature. However, except for a few U.S. cases, litigation in this area remains dormant in most jurisdictions. Now, in anticipation of the likelihood - and desirability - of such litigation, this ground-breaking study examines the extent to which a claim brought by a private, public, or quasi-public claimant against a private defendant (such as a producer of fossil fuels or major emitter of greenhouse gases) alleging climate change-related damage, and based on one or more causes of action under the English law of torts, can be pursued in the English Courts.
Author: Muhammad Munir
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 152
Get Book Here
Book Description
