The Organon, Or Logical Treatises, of Aristotle PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download The Organon, Or Logical Treatises, of Aristotle PDF full book. Access full book title The Organon, Or Logical Treatises, of Aristotle by Aristotle. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Aristotle
Publisher: London : H.G. Bohn
ISBN:
Category : Categories (Philosophy)
Languages : en
Pages : 380
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Aristotle
Publisher: London : H.G. Bohn
ISBN:
Category : Categories (Philosophy)
Languages : en
Pages : 380
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Aristotle
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 396
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Aristotle
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Logic
Languages : en
Pages : 426
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Aristotle
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Logic
Languages : en
Pages : 398
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Aristotle
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 416
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Octavius Freire Owen
Publisher: Franklin Classics Trade Press
ISBN: 9780343766238
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 376
Get Book Here
Book Description
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. To ensure a quality reading experience, this work has been proofread and republished using a format that seamlessly blends the original graphical elements with text in an easy-to-read typeface. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
Author: Aristotle
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Logic
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Aristotle
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780243639502
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Aristotle
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Logic
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Aristotle
Publisher: Theclassics.Us
ISBN: 9781230350257
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 152
Get Book Here
Book Description
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1901 edition. Excerpt: ...the consequent from the affirmation or negation of the antecedent; as, if man is, animal is; and if man is not, animal is. 10 That is, two subject terms, as A and B. He now enunciates that an argument from the negative of the consequent to the negative of the ante-cedcnt is valid. Btihle and Waitz read this passage differently to Taylor, by the insertion of the letter merely. II 1 hat is, the antecedent. " The consequent. existing, it is necessary that A should not be, (Ilhld) thus B not being great, it is impossible that A Buhie. i.e th should be white. " ' But if when A is not white, it is necessary that B should be great, it will necessarily happen that B not being great, B itself is great, which is impossible. For if B is not great, A will not be necessarily white, and if A not being white, B should be great, it results, as through three (terms), that if B is not great, it is great.f 'Xr""' Chap. V.--Of Demonstration in a Circle, in tht first Figure.1 The demonstration of things in a circle, and from i_,1.., . i, i. 1. Definition of each other, is by the conclusion, and by taking this kind of de-one proposition converse in predication, to con-elude the other, which we had taken in a former syllogism. As if it were required to show that A is with every C, we should have proved it through B;2 again,3 if a person should show that A is with B, assuming A present with C, but C with B, and A with B; first, on the contrary, he assumed B present with C. Or if it is necessary to demonstrate that B is with C,4 if he should have taken A (as predicated) of C, which was the conclusion,5 but B to be present with A, for it was first assumed6 conversely, that A was with B. It is not however possible in any other manner to demonstrate...
