Author: Eli Schwartz
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Taxation
Languages : en
Pages : 286
Book Description
Studies in the Distribution of Tax Burdens by Income Group -- a Critique
Author: Eli Schwartz
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Taxation
Languages : en
Pages : 286
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Taxation
Languages : en
Pages : 286
Book Description
The Distribution of the Tax Burden
Author: Edgar K. Browning
Publisher: Studies in Tax Policy
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 104
Book Description
Monograph on taxation in the USA - seeks tax reform in the national level tax system which is highly progressive to make tax collection equally distributed, makes use of economic theory on taxes and explains data sources, research methodology, data analysis and statistical computing, and covers federal, state and local tax burdens, fiscal policy, income distribution, income tax, consumption tax and corporation tax. Graphs, references and statistical tables.
Publisher: Studies in Tax Policy
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 104
Book Description
Monograph on taxation in the USA - seeks tax reform in the national level tax system which is highly progressive to make tax collection equally distributed, makes use of economic theory on taxes and explains data sources, research methodology, data analysis and statistical computing, and covers federal, state and local tax burdens, fiscal policy, income distribution, income tax, consumption tax and corporation tax. Graphs, references and statistical tables.
Distributional Analysis of Tax Policy
Author: David F. Bradford
Publisher: American Enterprise Institute
ISBN: 9780844738918
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 340
Book Description
The fifteen authors and five commentators include current and former members of the Office of Tax Analysis, the Joint Committee on Taxation, and the Congressional Budget Office, lending an authority to this discussion of tax distributional tables, their methodology, and consideration for improvement. The analysis outlines the attitudes and problems in the current distributional tax methods, innovations in the JCT distribution, the use of generational accounting, transfer systems, and lifetime taxpayer profiles. Annotation copyright by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR
Publisher: American Enterprise Institute
ISBN: 9780844738918
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 340
Book Description
The fifteen authors and five commentators include current and former members of the Office of Tax Analysis, the Joint Committee on Taxation, and the Congressional Budget Office, lending an authority to this discussion of tax distributional tables, their methodology, and consideration for improvement. The analysis outlines the attitudes and problems in the current distributional tax methods, innovations in the JCT distribution, the use of generational accounting, transfer systems, and lifetime taxpayer profiles. Annotation copyright by Book News, Inc., Portland, OR
Who Bears the Tax Burden?
Author: Joseph A. Pechman
Publisher: Washington : Brookings Institution
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 146
Book Description
Statistical analysis of the effects of the tax system on income distribution in the USA - discusses the methodology of incidence analysis and estimates the relative burden of all income tax allocations by income source and level, and concludes that the USA tax system is essentially proportional for the vast majority of families and therefore has little effect on the overall distribution of income. References and statistical tables.
Publisher: Washington : Brookings Institution
ISBN:
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 146
Book Description
Statistical analysis of the effects of the tax system on income distribution in the USA - discusses the methodology of incidence analysis and estimates the relative burden of all income tax allocations by income source and level, and concludes that the USA tax system is essentially proportional for the vast majority of families and therefore has little effect on the overall distribution of income. References and statistical tables.
Tax Progressivity and Income Inequality
Author: Joel Slemrod
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 9780521587761
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 388
Book Description
This book assembles nine papers on tax progressivity and its relationship to income inequality, written by leading public finance economists. The papers document the changes during the 1980s in progressivity at the federal, state, and local level in the US. One chapter investigates the extent to which the declining progressivity contributed to the well-documented increase in income inequality over the past two decades, while others investigate the economic impact and cost of progressive tax systems. Special attention is given to the behavioral response to taxation of high-income individuals, portfolio behavior, and the taxation of capital gains. The concluding set of essays addresses the contentious issue of what constitutes a 'fair' tax system, contrasting public attitudes towards alternative tax systems to economists' notions of fairness. Each essay is followed by remarks of a commentator plus a summary of the discussion among contributors.
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 9780521587761
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 388
Book Description
This book assembles nine papers on tax progressivity and its relationship to income inequality, written by leading public finance economists. The papers document the changes during the 1980s in progressivity at the federal, state, and local level in the US. One chapter investigates the extent to which the declining progressivity contributed to the well-documented increase in income inequality over the past two decades, while others investigate the economic impact and cost of progressive tax systems. Special attention is given to the behavioral response to taxation of high-income individuals, portfolio behavior, and the taxation of capital gains. The concluding set of essays addresses the contentious issue of what constitutes a 'fair' tax system, contrasting public attitudes towards alternative tax systems to economists' notions of fairness. Each essay is followed by remarks of a commentator plus a summary of the discussion among contributors.
An Alternative View of Tax Incidence Analysis for Developing Countries
Author: Anwar Shah
Publisher: World Bank Publications
ISBN:
Category : Impuestos - Paises en desarrollo
Languages : en
Pages : 67
Book Description
Abstract: points raised here.
Publisher: World Bank Publications
ISBN:
Category : Impuestos - Paises en desarrollo
Languages : en
Pages : 67
Book Description
Abstract: points raised here.
The Economics of Taxation
Author: Henry Aaron
Publisher: Brookings Institution Press
ISBN: 9780815707066
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 454
Book Description
This volume brings together the contributions of twenty-four economists and lawyers on tax policy. Five papers build on the work of Joseph A. Pechman in analyzing the distribution of tax burdens. A. B. Atkinson relates the analysis of redistribution of income through the tax system to horizontal equity, James Buchanan and Geoffrey Brennan demonstrate that a full analysis of tax burdens must encompass tax-induced inefficiencies, and Boris I. Bittker examines how tax inequities become resource misallocation. In separate papers, Joseph J. Minarik and Benjamin A. Okner elaborate on and extend Pechman’s analyses of tax burdens. Three papers address the concept of tax expenditures: Stanley S. Surrey and Paul R. McDaniel trace the development of the idea, Martin S. Feldstein demonstrates that some use of tax expenditures is necessary for the sake of economic efficiency, and Gerard M. Brannon examines the relations between tax expenditures and the distribution of income. Michael J. Boskin, Richard Goode, Peter Mieszkowski, and John B. Shoven and Paul Taubman examine alternative tax bases. Harvey E. Brazer and Alicia H. Munnell, in separate papers, argue that the basic unit subject to the personal income tax should be the individual rather than the family. David F. Bradford and Arnold C. Harberger analyze changes that would reduce present biases in the tax treatment of investment income. George F. Break and Charles E. McLure, Jr., consider possible improvements in the personal and corporation income taxes imposed by states. E. Cary Brown, Richard A. Musgrave, and Emil M. Sunley deal with fiscal policy. Brown draws lessons from U.S. History since 1945. Musgrave confronts Marxian and other theories of fiscal crises with the facts. Sunley describes the many pitfalls between proposals for even modest tax change and final congressional action.
Publisher: Brookings Institution Press
ISBN: 9780815707066
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 454
Book Description
This volume brings together the contributions of twenty-four economists and lawyers on tax policy. Five papers build on the work of Joseph A. Pechman in analyzing the distribution of tax burdens. A. B. Atkinson relates the analysis of redistribution of income through the tax system to horizontal equity, James Buchanan and Geoffrey Brennan demonstrate that a full analysis of tax burdens must encompass tax-induced inefficiencies, and Boris I. Bittker examines how tax inequities become resource misallocation. In separate papers, Joseph J. Minarik and Benjamin A. Okner elaborate on and extend Pechman’s analyses of tax burdens. Three papers address the concept of tax expenditures: Stanley S. Surrey and Paul R. McDaniel trace the development of the idea, Martin S. Feldstein demonstrates that some use of tax expenditures is necessary for the sake of economic efficiency, and Gerard M. Brannon examines the relations between tax expenditures and the distribution of income. Michael J. Boskin, Richard Goode, Peter Mieszkowski, and John B. Shoven and Paul Taubman examine alternative tax bases. Harvey E. Brazer and Alicia H. Munnell, in separate papers, argue that the basic unit subject to the personal income tax should be the individual rather than the family. David F. Bradford and Arnold C. Harberger analyze changes that would reduce present biases in the tax treatment of investment income. George F. Break and Charles E. McLure, Jr., consider possible improvements in the personal and corporation income taxes imposed by states. E. Cary Brown, Richard A. Musgrave, and Emil M. Sunley deal with fiscal policy. Brown draws lessons from U.S. History since 1945. Musgrave confronts Marxian and other theories of fiscal crises with the facts. Sunley describes the many pitfalls between proposals for even modest tax change and final congressional action.
Wealth and Power in America
Author: Gabriel Kolko
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Income
Languages : en
Pages : 200
Book Description
Gabriel Kolko points to unemployment, hidden income, unequal tax burdens, and poverty as leading to greater failure in future economic democracy.
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Income
Languages : en
Pages : 200
Book Description
Gabriel Kolko points to unemployment, hidden income, unequal tax burdens, and poverty as leading to greater failure in future economic democracy.
Analysis of Net Tax Burden in Korea
Author: The Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs (South Korea)
Publisher: 길잡이미디어
ISBN: 8968272174
Category : Income distribution
Languages : en
Pages : 75
Book Description
In recent days, there is an active discussion on the size of the social welfare expenditures. We need to evaluate first on the efficiency of current fiscal expenditure, because the source of the government expenditure is mostly financed by tax. Specifically, we need to investigate whether the expenditure properly attain its original objective, the effectiveness of the short- and long-term expenditures, and the appropriateness of the size of the government expenditures. In this research, we investigated the burden of net-tax by income decile group. The net tax is defined as the difference between taxes and benefits. A micro-simulation model for the tax-benefit model is started to be developed with the basis of this research. Major findings can be summarized as follows. The overall average amount of the market income per month is 3,430 thousand Won. The monthly amount for the first income decile is 210 thousand Won, 2,830 Won for the fifth dcecile, and 8,920 thousand Won for the richest decile. Private transfer varies according to the income decile groups. It is 100 thousand Won for the first decile group, 110 thosand Won for the fifth decile group, and 220 thousand Won for the tenth income decile group. On the other hand, the public transfers are heavily concentrated on the lowest income decile group. 380 thousand Won per month for the lowest income decile group. 220 thousand Won for the second lowest income decile group, 130 thousand Won for the third income decile group. For the richest income decile, the amount of the public transfer per month is only 60 thousand Won per month. Thanks to the public transfers, the total income from the lowest income decile group tose to 800 thousand Won, and 1,610 won for the second income decile group. The amount of the public transfer decreases as the income increase, it is clear that the public transfers serve as a useful policy instrument for the income redistribution. Regarding income tax burden, the overall burden per household is 130 thousand Won per household. By income deciile, it is zero or very close to zero for the income decile up to the foth decile group, but the tenth (richest) income decile group paid 400 thousand Won per month. These figures are close to Sung Myong-jae et al. (2010) but slightly lower than those of Park Ki-baek (2010). One reason why we have this kind of result is due to the fact that almost lower half of the workers are not paying income taxes. For the social security burden is concerned, the average burden per month is 350 thousand Won. It is 30 thousand Won for the lowest income decile group, 60 thousand Won for the second decile group, and the highest income decile group pays 420 thousand Won per month. The average magnitude for the disposable income is 3,360 thousand Won per month. It is 750 thousand Won for the lowest income decile, 1,530 thousand Won for the second lowest income decile group, 2,920 thousand Won for the fifth income decile group, and 3,360 thousand Won for the highest income decile group. The overall burden for the value-added tax is 180 thousand Won per month. 80 thousand Won for the lowest income decile group, 110 thousand Won for the second lowest income group, 170 thousand Won for the fifth decile group, and 330 thousand Won for the highest income decile group. The benefit distribution of the in-kind social benefits by decile can be summarized as follows: 320 thousand Won for the lowest income decile group, 290 thousand Won for the second lowest income deciles group, whereas the amount for the fifth income decile and above is 510-570 thousand Won and is quite stable. CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1.1 Motivation 1.2 Objevtives and Organization CHAPTER 2 Summary of Previous Literatiure 2.1 Analysis of Pure Public Goods 2.2 Summary of Previous Literature? 2.3 Tax-Benefit Model CHAPTER 3 Data and Methodology 3.1 Analysis of the Distribution of Tax Burden 3.2 Analysis of the Distribution of Benefits CHAPTER 4 Analysis of Net Tax Burden 4.1 Analysis of the Tax Burden by Income Decile 4.2 Progressivity and Horizontal Equity of tax 4.3 Analysis of Net tax Burden CHAPTER 5 Summary and Implications? 5.1 Summary of Findings 5.2 Implications and Future Direction Reference
Publisher: 길잡이미디어
ISBN: 8968272174
Category : Income distribution
Languages : en
Pages : 75
Book Description
In recent days, there is an active discussion on the size of the social welfare expenditures. We need to evaluate first on the efficiency of current fiscal expenditure, because the source of the government expenditure is mostly financed by tax. Specifically, we need to investigate whether the expenditure properly attain its original objective, the effectiveness of the short- and long-term expenditures, and the appropriateness of the size of the government expenditures. In this research, we investigated the burden of net-tax by income decile group. The net tax is defined as the difference between taxes and benefits. A micro-simulation model for the tax-benefit model is started to be developed with the basis of this research. Major findings can be summarized as follows. The overall average amount of the market income per month is 3,430 thousand Won. The monthly amount for the first income decile is 210 thousand Won, 2,830 Won for the fifth dcecile, and 8,920 thousand Won for the richest decile. Private transfer varies according to the income decile groups. It is 100 thousand Won for the first decile group, 110 thosand Won for the fifth decile group, and 220 thousand Won for the tenth income decile group. On the other hand, the public transfers are heavily concentrated on the lowest income decile group. 380 thousand Won per month for the lowest income decile group. 220 thousand Won for the second lowest income decile group, 130 thousand Won for the third income decile group. For the richest income decile, the amount of the public transfer per month is only 60 thousand Won per month. Thanks to the public transfers, the total income from the lowest income decile group tose to 800 thousand Won, and 1,610 won for the second income decile group. The amount of the public transfer decreases as the income increase, it is clear that the public transfers serve as a useful policy instrument for the income redistribution. Regarding income tax burden, the overall burden per household is 130 thousand Won per household. By income deciile, it is zero or very close to zero for the income decile up to the foth decile group, but the tenth (richest) income decile group paid 400 thousand Won per month. These figures are close to Sung Myong-jae et al. (2010) but slightly lower than those of Park Ki-baek (2010). One reason why we have this kind of result is due to the fact that almost lower half of the workers are not paying income taxes. For the social security burden is concerned, the average burden per month is 350 thousand Won. It is 30 thousand Won for the lowest income decile group, 60 thousand Won for the second decile group, and the highest income decile group pays 420 thousand Won per month. The average magnitude for the disposable income is 3,360 thousand Won per month. It is 750 thousand Won for the lowest income decile, 1,530 thousand Won for the second lowest income decile group, 2,920 thousand Won for the fifth income decile group, and 3,360 thousand Won for the highest income decile group. The overall burden for the value-added tax is 180 thousand Won per month. 80 thousand Won for the lowest income decile group, 110 thousand Won for the second lowest income group, 170 thousand Won for the fifth decile group, and 330 thousand Won for the highest income decile group. The benefit distribution of the in-kind social benefits by decile can be summarized as follows: 320 thousand Won for the lowest income decile group, 290 thousand Won for the second lowest income deciles group, whereas the amount for the fifth income decile and above is 510-570 thousand Won and is quite stable. CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1.1 Motivation 1.2 Objevtives and Organization CHAPTER 2 Summary of Previous Literatiure 2.1 Analysis of Pure Public Goods 2.2 Summary of Previous Literature? 2.3 Tax-Benefit Model CHAPTER 3 Data and Methodology 3.1 Analysis of the Distribution of Tax Burden 3.2 Analysis of the Distribution of Benefits CHAPTER 4 Analysis of Net Tax Burden 4.1 Analysis of the Tax Burden by Income Decile 4.2 Progressivity and Horizontal Equity of tax 4.3 Analysis of Net tax Burden CHAPTER 5 Summary and Implications? 5.1 Summary of Findings 5.2 Implications and Future Direction Reference
Distribution of Income and the Income Tax Burden in Bulgaria
Author: A. M. Fareed Hassan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
February 1995 The empirical analysis of Bulgaria's income distribution and income tax burden indicates that the country has low income inequality although this is changing rapidly. The income tax is progressive and contributes significantly to reducing income inequality, and the urban sector pays proportionately more in taxes than the rural sector. Using the 1992 Bulgarian household budget survey, Bogetic and Hassan analyze the distribution of income and of the income tax burden by income and expenditure class and by rural-urban sector. They find: * Low income inequality (although that is changing rapidly). * A progressive income tax system. The poor (the lowest two-income decile) pay only 1.4 percent of their per capita income in income tax; the rich (the top decile) pay nearly 6 percent. In-kind income and expenditures are excluded from taxation. * The urban sector paying proportionately more in taxes than the rural sector. For example, urban households pay 5.3 percent of their per capita income in income tax, whereas the rural sector pays 2.4 percent. * Income tax contributes significantly to reducing income inequality at both the national and sectoral (rural-urban) level, as the poor pay a smaller share of taxes than their share of national income. These results hold whether income or expenditure is used as an indicator of economic well-being. Bogetic and Hassan caution that as in-kind income becomes monetized and the economy becomes more market-oriented, the system will become less progressive and urban-rural differences will diminish. They contend that the bias toward higher urban taxes is justified to some extent by the fact that urban households benefit more from government services than rural households do. This paper -- a product of the Country Operations Division, Europe and Central Asia, Country Department I -- is part of a larger effort in the region to analyze the consequences of government public finance policies. This paper is a part of a volume under preparation, Financing Government in the Transition: Bulgaria, edited by Zeljko Bogetic and Arye Hillman. The preparation of the volume is supported by the Bank's Research Support Budget under dissemination grant Taxation and Revenue Adequacy in Transition: Observations and Implications from Bulgaria (RPO 679-60). Fareed Hassan may be contacted at [email protected].
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
February 1995 The empirical analysis of Bulgaria's income distribution and income tax burden indicates that the country has low income inequality although this is changing rapidly. The income tax is progressive and contributes significantly to reducing income inequality, and the urban sector pays proportionately more in taxes than the rural sector. Using the 1992 Bulgarian household budget survey, Bogetic and Hassan analyze the distribution of income and of the income tax burden by income and expenditure class and by rural-urban sector. They find: * Low income inequality (although that is changing rapidly). * A progressive income tax system. The poor (the lowest two-income decile) pay only 1.4 percent of their per capita income in income tax; the rich (the top decile) pay nearly 6 percent. In-kind income and expenditures are excluded from taxation. * The urban sector paying proportionately more in taxes than the rural sector. For example, urban households pay 5.3 percent of their per capita income in income tax, whereas the rural sector pays 2.4 percent. * Income tax contributes significantly to reducing income inequality at both the national and sectoral (rural-urban) level, as the poor pay a smaller share of taxes than their share of national income. These results hold whether income or expenditure is used as an indicator of economic well-being. Bogetic and Hassan caution that as in-kind income becomes monetized and the economy becomes more market-oriented, the system will become less progressive and urban-rural differences will diminish. They contend that the bias toward higher urban taxes is justified to some extent by the fact that urban households benefit more from government services than rural households do. This paper -- a product of the Country Operations Division, Europe and Central Asia, Country Department I -- is part of a larger effort in the region to analyze the consequences of government public finance policies. This paper is a part of a volume under preparation, Financing Government in the Transition: Bulgaria, edited by Zeljko Bogetic and Arye Hillman. The preparation of the volume is supported by the Bank's Research Support Budget under dissemination grant Taxation and Revenue Adequacy in Transition: Observations and Implications from Bulgaria (RPO 679-60). Fareed Hassan may be contacted at [email protected].