Recovery Act Education Programs :. PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Recovery Act Education Programs :. PDF full book. Access full book title Recovery Act Education Programs :. by United States. Government Accountability Office. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: United States. Government Accountability Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: United States. Government Accountability Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Cornelia Ashby
Publisher: DIANE Publishing
ISBN: 1437938965
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 194
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: George Scott
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781437989847
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: U.s. Government Accountability Office
Publisher:
ISBN: 9781974548989
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 82
Get Book Here
Book Description
"The American Recovery andReinvestment Act of 2009 (RecoveryAct) provided $70.3 billion for threeeducation programs-the State FiscalStabilization Fund (SFSF); Title I, PartA of the Elementary and SecondaryEducation Act (Title I); and Individualswith Disabilities Education Act (IDEA),Part B. One goal of the Recovery Actwas to save and create jobs, andSFSF also requires states to reportinformation expected to increasetransparency and advance educationalreform.This report responds to two ongoingGAO mandates under the RecoveryAct. It examines (1) how selectedstates and local recipients used thefunds; (2) what plans the Departmentof Education (Education) and selectedstates have to assess the impact of thefunds; (3) what approaches are beingused to ensure accountability of thefunds; and (4) how Education andstates ensure the accuracy of recipientreported data.To conduct this review, GAO gatheredinformation from 14 states and theDistrict of Columbia, conducted anationally representative survey oflocal educational agencies (LEA),interviewed Education officials,examined recipient reports, andreviewed relevant policy documents. "
Author: United States. Government Accountability Office
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 76
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: U S Government Accountability Office (G
Publisher: BiblioGov
ISBN: 9781289110567
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 86
Get Book Here
Book Description
The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is an independent agency that works for Congress. The GAO watches over Congress, and investigates how the federal government spends taxpayers dollars. The Comptroller General of the United States is the leader of the GAO, and is appointed to a 15-year term by the U.S. President. The GAO wants to support Congress, while at the same time doing right by the citizens of the United States. They audit, investigate, perform analyses, issue legal decisions and report anything that the government is doing. This is one of their reports.
Author: National Research Council (U.S.). Committee for the Reusable Booster System: Review and Assessment
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780309266536
Category : Aeronautics
Languages : en
Pages : 114
Get Book Here
Book Description
"On June 15, 2011, the Air Force Space Command established a new vision, mission, and set of goals to ensure continued U.S. dominance in space and cyberspace mission areas. Subsequently, and in coordination with the Air Force Research Laboratory, the Space and Missile Systems Center, and the 14th and 24th Air Forces, the Air Force Space Command identified four long-term science and technology (S & T) challenges critical to meeting these goals. One of these challenges is to provide full-spectrum launch capability at dramatically lower cost, and a reusable booster system (RBS) has been proposed as an approach to meet this challenge. The Air Force Space Command asked the Aeronautics and Space Engineering Board of the National Research Council to conduct an independent review and assessment of the RBS concept prior to considering a continuation of RBS-related activities within the Air Force Research Laboratory portfolio and before initiating a more extensive RBS development program. The committee for the Reusable Booster System: Review and Assessment was formed in response to that request and charged with reviewing and assessing the criteria and assumptions used in the current RBS plans, the cost model methodologies used to fame [frame?] the RBS business case, and the technical maturity and development plans of key elements critical to RBS implementation. The committee consisted of experts not connected with current RBS activities who have significant expertise in launch vehicle design and operation, research and technology development and implementation, space system operations, and cost analysis. The committee solicited and received input on the Air Force launch requirements, the baseline RBS concept, cost models and assessment, and technology readiness. The committee also received input from industry associated with RBS concept, industry independent of the RBS concept, and propulsion system providers which is summarized in Reusable Booster System: Review and Assessment"--Publisher's Summary.
Author: United States Government Accountability Office
Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN: 9781983507649
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 194
Get Book Here
Book Description
Recovery Act: States Could Provide More Information on Education Programs to Enhance the Public's Understanding of Fund Use
Author: George A. Scott
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 82
Get Book Here
Book Description
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) provided $70.3 billion for three education programs--the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF); Title I, Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (Title I); and Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Part B. One goal of the Recovery Act was to save and create jobs, and SFSF also requires states to report information expected to increase transparency and advance educational reform. This report responds to two ongoing US Government Accountability Office (GAO) mandates under the Recovery Act. It examines (1) how selected states and local recipients used the funds; (2) what plans the Department of Education (Education) and selected states have to assess the impact of the funds; (3) what approaches are being used to ensure accountability of the funds; and (4) how Education and states ensure the accuracy of recipient reported data. To conduct this review, GAO gathered information from 14 states and the District of Columbia, conducted a nationally representative survey of local educational agencies (LEA), interviewed Education officials, examined recipient reports, and reviewed relevant policy documents. GAO recommends that the Secretary of Education establish mechanisms to improve the consistency of communicating SFSF monitoring feedback to states. Education agreed with our recommendation. Appended are: (1) Objectives, Scope, and Methodology; (2) Drawdown Rates by Program; (3) Comments from the Department of Education; (4) Status of Prior Open Recommendations and Matters for Congressional Consideration; (5) GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments. (Contains 5 tables, 8 figures and 71 footnotes.).
Author: Cornelia M. Ashby
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 194
Get Book Here
Book Description
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) provides $70.3 billion for three education programs--the State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF), Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (Title I), and Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The Act requires recipients to be accountable for how these funds are being used and what is being achieved. To help attain the level of transparency needed for accountability, recipients are to report quarterly on their award activities and expected outcomes. This information is available to the public on Recovery.gov, the government's official Recovery Act Web site. This report covers three Education programs funded by the Recovery Act. It (1) describes what the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the Department of Education (Education) did to facilitate implementation of requirements for recipients to describe the use of funds and (2) assesses the extent to which award descriptions are transparent It also describes reported fund uses for a sample of subrecipients. GAO reviewed requirements for reporting in the Act as well as guidance provided by OMB and Education. GAO assessed the transparency of descriptions for the three education programs on Recovery.gov. GAO recommends that the Secretary of Education, in consultation with OMB, remove the suggested language for the project description field from its guidance and instruct states to include information, to the extent possible, on how the funds are being used and potential project outcomes or results. Appended are: (1) SFSF Education Stabilization Funds Prime Recipient Review and Descriptions; (2) IDEA Part B for School Aged Children Prime Recipient Review and Descriptions; (3) ESEA Title I, Part A Grants Prime Recipient Review and Descriptions; (4) SFSF Education Stabilization Funds: Selected Subrecipient (LEA) Descriptions; (5) IDEA Part B for School Aged Children: Selected Subrecipient (LEA) Descriptions; (6) ESEA Title I, Part A Grants to Local Educational Agencies: Selected Subrecipient (LEA) Descriptions; (7) Scope and Methodology; and (8) GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments. (Contains 5 tables and 15 footnotes.).
