Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Trans Mountain Pipeline Inc. (formerly Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc.)

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Trans Mountain Pipeline Inc. (formerly Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc.) PDF Author: Canada. National Energy Board
Publisher: Canadian Museum of Civilization/Musee Canadien Des Civilisations
ISBN:
Category : Transportation
Languages : en
Pages : 72

Get Book Here

Book Description
The National Energy Board publishes reasons for decisions when it expects its decisions to influence actions beyond the particular case that was heard. In 2006 and 2007, in response to apportionment concerns on the Trans Mountain pipeline system, Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc. (now Trans Mountain Pipeline Inc.) submitted a series of applications to the National Energy Board of revisions to the Trans Mountain Tariffs. Four of these applications proposed significant and controversial changes to the capacity allocation procedures on the pipeline system. The Board's decisions on these applications, with reasons, were released 15 March 2006, 12 April 2006, 20 July 2006 and 16 August 2007. This document compiles these four decisions for ease of reference.--Includes text from document.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Trans Mountain Pipeline Inc. (formerly Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc.)

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Trans Mountain Pipeline Inc. (formerly Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc.) PDF Author: Canada. National Energy Board
Publisher: Canadian Museum of Civilization/Musee Canadien Des Civilisations
ISBN:
Category : Transportation
Languages : en
Pages : 72

Get Book Here

Book Description
The National Energy Board publishes reasons for decisions when it expects its decisions to influence actions beyond the particular case that was heard. In 2006 and 2007, in response to apportionment concerns on the Trans Mountain pipeline system, Terasen Pipelines (Trans Mountain) Inc. (now Trans Mountain Pipeline Inc.) submitted a series of applications to the National Energy Board of revisions to the Trans Mountain Tariffs. Four of these applications proposed significant and controversial changes to the capacity allocation procedures on the pipeline system. The Board's decisions on these applications, with reasons, were released 15 March 2006, 12 April 2006, 20 July 2006 and 16 August 2007. This document compiles these four decisions for ease of reference.--Includes text from document.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Trans Mountain Pipeline Inc

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Trans Mountain Pipeline Inc PDF Author: Canada. National Energy Board
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Petroleum
Languages : en
Pages : 36

Get Book Here

Book Description
This document concerns an application to the National Energy Board (NEB) dated 14 March 2008 by Trans Mountain Pipeline Inc. (TMI) for approval of proposed Tariff No. 74, Rules and Regulations Governing the Transportation of Petroleum, to be effective 1 May 2008, the in-service date for Phase 1 of the TMX Anchor Loop Expansion Project, filed with the NEB under File No. OF-Tolls-Group1-T246-2008-02 01; and Hearing Order RH-4-2008, heard in Calgary, Alberta on 4 September 2008. This document provides an overview of the matters considered by the NEB in reaching a decision on the application and details of the NEB's assessment of issues identified by the NEB or by parties to the proceeding, including: the allocation of capacity with respect to receipts and deliveries at Kamloops; the appropriate capacity to be allocated for deliveries over the Westridge Dock; the appropriate tariff, rules and regulations governing nominations and the allocation of capacity for deliveries over the Westridge Dock; the definition of Land versus Dock Deliveries; the appropriate tariff, rules and regulations governing nominations and the allocation of capacity for deliveries to land-based destinations; whether there should be a regular review by TMI and its shippers of capacity allocations to the various destinations on the Trans Mountain pipeline system; and whether the proposed allocation procedures to accommodate Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Anchor Loop TMX expansion are consistent with the National Energy Board Act.--Includes text from document.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Alliance Pipeline Ltd., Enbridge Pipelines Inc., Enbridge Pipelines (NW) Inc., Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd., Kinder Morgan Cochin ULC, NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd., Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC on Behalf of Trans Mountain LP, Trans Québec and Maritimes Pipeline Inc., TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd., TransCanada PipeLines Limited, Trans-Northern Pipelines Inc., and Westcoast Energy Inc., Carrying on Business as Spectra Energy Transmission

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Alliance Pipeline Ltd., Enbridge Pipelines Inc., Enbridge Pipelines (NW) Inc., Foothills Pipe Lines Ltd., Kinder Morgan Cochin ULC, NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd., Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC on Behalf of Trans Mountain LP, Trans Québec and Maritimes Pipeline Inc., TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd., TransCanada PipeLines Limited, Trans-Northern Pipelines Inc., and Westcoast Energy Inc., Carrying on Business as Spectra Energy Transmission PDF Author: Canada. National Energy Board
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Land use
Languages : en
Pages : 128

Get Book Here

Book Description
In early 2008, the National Energy Board (Board or NEB) identified a proposed approach for the Land Matters Consultative Initiative (LMCI), consisting of four distinct topic streams. One of the streams, Stream 3, was Pipeline Abandonment--Financial Issues. The Board indicated that the key issue to be considered in respect of that stream was: "What is the optimal way to ensure that funds are available when abandonment costs are incurred?" The Board noted two key principles fundamental to its future decisions with respect to the financial matters related to pipeline abandonment. These were: a) Abandonment costs are a legitimate cost of providing service and are recoverable upon Board approval from users of the system; and b) Landowners will not be liable for costs of pipeline abandonment. These Reasons for Decision provide an overview of the matters considered by the Board in reaching a decision in respect of the abandonment cost estimates applications.--Document.

Government Reports Announcements & Index

Government Reports Announcements & Index PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 586

Get Book Here

Book Description


Canadiana

Canadiana PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Canada
Languages : en
Pages : 1484

Get Book Here

Book Description


Canadian-American Law Journal

Canadian-American Law Journal PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 274

Get Book Here

Book Description


Aboriginal Consultation, Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Review in Canada

Aboriginal Consultation, Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Review in Canada PDF Author: Kirk N. Lambrecht
Publisher: University of Regina Press
ISBN: 0889772983
Category : Business & Economics
Languages : en
Pages : 209

Get Book Here

Book Description
Supreme Court of Canada decisions have defined a general framework for the "duty to consult" Aboriginal peoples and accommodate their concerns over natural resource development, but anticipate the details of that framework will be expanded upon in the future. Aboriginal Consultation, Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Review in Canada offers a paradigm that advances that discussion. It proposes an integrated and robust planning model for natural resource extraction allowing Aboriginal peoples, industry, governments, tribunals, and the Courts to all make contributions to reconciliation in the context of sustainable development and environmental protection. Kirk Lambrecht surveys the law of actual and asserted Aboriginal rights and historical and modern Treaty rights in Canada and discusses the national and international purposes of environmental assessment and regulatory review. He appraises the fundamental principles of Supreme Court of Canada jurisprudence defining aboriginal consultation and accommodation as a constitutional imperative and uses case studies involving the National Energy Board to demonstrate how integrated process has evolved over time. Finally he offers general conclusions on the practical utility, and outstanding challenges, involving an integrated planning paradigm.

Environmental Decisionmaking in a Transboundary Region

Environmental Decisionmaking in a Transboundary Region PDF Author: Alison Rieser
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 1475714084
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 221

Get Book Here

Book Description


Energy Research Abstracts

Energy Research Abstracts PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Power resources
Languages : en
Pages : 840

Get Book Here

Book Description


Government of Canada Publications

Government of Canada Publications PDF Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Government publications
Languages : en
Pages : 1104

Get Book Here

Book Description