Objectivity in Law and Legal Reasoning

Objectivity in Law and Legal Reasoning PDF Author: Jaakko Husa
Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing
ISBN: 1782250689
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 285

Get Book Here

Book Description
Legal theorists consider their discipline as an objective endeavour in line with other fields of science. Objectivity in science is generally regarded as a fundamental condition, informing how science should be practised and how truths may be found. Objective scientists venture to uncover empirical truths about the world and ought to eliminate personal biases, prior commitments and emotional involvement. However, legal theorists are inevitably bound up with a given legal culture. Consequently, their scholarly work derives at least in part from this environment and their subtle interaction with it. This book questions critically, in novel ways and from various perspectives, the possibilities of objectivity of legal theory in the twenty-first century. It transpires that legal theory is unavoidably confronted with varying conceptions of law, underlying ideologies, approaches to legal method, argumentation and discourse etc, which limit the possibilities of 'objectivity' in law and in legal reasoning. The authors of this book reveal some of these underlying notions and discuss their consequences for legal theory.

Objectivity in Law and Legal Reasoning

Objectivity in Law and Legal Reasoning PDF Author: Jaakko Husa
Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing
ISBN: 1782250689
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 285

Get Book Here

Book Description
Legal theorists consider their discipline as an objective endeavour in line with other fields of science. Objectivity in science is generally regarded as a fundamental condition, informing how science should be practised and how truths may be found. Objective scientists venture to uncover empirical truths about the world and ought to eliminate personal biases, prior commitments and emotional involvement. However, legal theorists are inevitably bound up with a given legal culture. Consequently, their scholarly work derives at least in part from this environment and their subtle interaction with it. This book questions critically, in novel ways and from various perspectives, the possibilities of objectivity of legal theory in the twenty-first century. It transpires that legal theory is unavoidably confronted with varying conceptions of law, underlying ideologies, approaches to legal method, argumentation and discourse etc, which limit the possibilities of 'objectivity' in law and in legal reasoning. The authors of this book reveal some of these underlying notions and discuss their consequences for legal theory.

Law and Objectivity

Law and Objectivity PDF Author: Kent Greenawalt
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0195356926
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 301

Get Book Here

Book Description
In modern times the idea of the objectivity of law has been undermined by skepticism about legal institutions, disbelief in ideals of unbiased evaluation, and a conviction that language is indeterminate. Greenawalt here considers the validity of such skepticism, examining such questions as: whether the law as it exists provides determinate answers to legal problems; whether the law should treat people in an "objective way," according to abstract rules, general categories, and external consequences; and how far the law is anchored in something external to itself, such as social morality, political justice, or economic efficiency. In the process he illuminates the development of jurisprudence in the English-speaking world over the last fifty years, assessing the contributions of many important movements.

Common Law Judging

Common Law Judging PDF Author: Douglas E. Edlin
Publisher: University of Michigan Press
ISBN: 0472130021
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 281

Get Book Here

Book Description
Moving beyond the subjectivity-objectivity debate, Edlin presents a case for intersubjectivity

Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System

Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System PDF Author: Tara Smith
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1107114497
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 303

Get Book Here

Book Description
This book grounds judicial review in its deepest foundations: the function, authority, and objectivity of a legal system as a whole.

Objectivity in Law

Objectivity in Law PDF Author: Nicos Stavropoulos
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 9780198258995
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 238

Get Book Here

Book Description
This treatise addresses a central topic in contemporary jurisprudence, namely whether it is possible for legal interpretations to be objective. The author claims that objectivity is possible in law, offering arguments based on metaphysics, philosophy and meta-ethics to reinforce his theory.

Evidential Legal Reasoning

Evidential Legal Reasoning PDF Author: Jordi Ferrer Beltrán
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1009036955
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 459

Get Book Here

Book Description
This book offers a transnational perspective of evidentiary problems, drawing on insights from different systems and legal traditions. It avoids the isolated manner of analyzing evidence and proof within each Common Law and Civil Law tradition. Instead, it features contributions from leading authors in the evidentiary field from a variety of jurisdictions and offers an overview of essential topics that are of both theoretical and practical interest. The collection examines evidence not only as a transnational field, but in a cross-disciplinary context. Each chapter engages with the interdisciplinary themes cutting through the issues discussed, benefiting from the expertise and experience of their diverse authors.

Demystifying Legal Reasoning

Demystifying Legal Reasoning PDF Author: Larry Alexander
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 113947247X
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 254

Get Book Here

Book Description
Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practise special forms of reasoning is false.

Theory of Legal Science

Theory of Legal Science PDF Author: Aleksander Peczenik
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
ISBN: 9400964811
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 698

Get Book Here

Book Description
Proceedings of the Conference on Legal Theory and Philosophy of Science, Lund, Sweden, December 11-14, 1983

Objectivity and the Rule of Law

Objectivity and the Rule of Law PDF Author: Matthew Kramer
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 1139463969
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 233

Get Book Here

Book Description
What is objectivity? What is the rule of law? Are the operations of legal systems objective? If so, in what ways and to what degrees are they objective? Does anything of importance depend on the objectivity of law? These are some of the principal questions addressed by Matthew H. Kramer in this lucid and wide-ranging study that introduces readers to vital areas of philosophical enquiry. As Kramer shows, objectivity and the rule of law are complicated phenomena, each comprising a number of distinct though overlapping dimensions. Although the connections between objectivity and the rule of law are intimate, they are also densely multi-faceted.

Legality

Legality PDF Author: Scott J. Shapiro
Publisher: Harvard University Press
ISBN: 067426729X
Category : Science
Languages : en
Pages : 483

Get Book Here

Book Description
What is law? This question has preoccupied philosophers from Plato to Thomas Hobbes to H. L. A. Hart. Yet many others find it perplexing. How could we possibly know how to answer such an abstract question? And what would be the point of doing so? In Legality, Scott Shapiro argues that the question is not only meaningful but vitally important. In fact, many of the most pressing puzzles that lawyers confront—including who has legal authority over us and how we should interpret constitutions, statutes, and cases—will remain elusive until this grand philosophical question is resolved. Shapiro draws on recent work in the philosophy of action to develop an original and compelling answer to this age-old question. Breaking with a long tradition in jurisprudence, he argues that the law cannot be understood simply in terms of rules. Legal systems are best understood as highly complex and sophisticated tools for creating and applying plans. Shifting the focus of jurisprudence in this way—from rules to plans—not only resolves many of the most vexing puzzles about the nature of law but has profound implications for legal practice as well. Written in clear, jargon-free language, and presupposing no legal or philosophical background, Legality is both a groundbreaking new theory of law and an excellent introduction to and defense of classical jurisprudence.