Author: Great Britain. Royal Commission on Delay in the King's Bench Division
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Minutes of Evidence Taken Before the Royal Commission on Delay in the King's Bench Division
Author: Great Britain. Royal Commission on Delay in the King's Bench Division
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Minutes of Evidence Taken Before the Royal Commission on Delay in the King's Bench Division
Author: Great Britain. Royal commission on delay in King's bench division
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Minutes of Evidence Taken Before the Royal Commission on Delay in the King's Bench Division
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
First [second and Final] Report[s and Minutes of Evidence ... with Appendices and Index] of the Commissioners
Author: Great Britain. Royal Commission on Delay in the King's Bench Division
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 504
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 504
Book Description
Minutes of Evidence Taken Before the Royal Commission [on the Civil Service]
Author: Sir Raymond Priestley
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Book Description
Tables and Indexes
Author: Great Britain. Parliament. House of Lords
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 274
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 274
Book Description
Journal of the American Judicature Society
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electronic journals
Languages : en
Pages : 278
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Electronic journals
Languages : en
Pages : 278
Book Description
Expert evidence in criminal proceedings in England and Wales
Author: Great Britain: Law Commission
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780102971170
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 224
Book Description
This project addressed the admissibility of expert evidence in criminal proceedings in England and Wales. Currently, too much expert opinion evidence is admitted without adequate scrutiny because no clear test is being applied to determine whether the evidence is sufficiently reliable to be admitted. Juries may therefore be reaching conclusions on the basis of unreliable evidence, as confirmed by a number of miscarriages of justice in recent years. Following consultation on a discussion paper (LCCP 190, 2009, ISDBN 9780118404655) the Commission recommends that there should be a new reliability-based admissibility test for expert evidence in criminal proceedings. The test would not need to be applied routinely or unnecessarily, but it would be applied in appropriate cases and it would result in the exclusion of unreliable expert opinion evidence. Under the test, expert opinion evidence would not be admitted unless it was adjudged to be sufficiently reliable to go before a jury. The draft Criminal Evidence (Experts) Bill published with the report (as Appendix A) sets out the admissibility test and also provides the guidance judges would need when applying the test, setting out the key reasons why an expert's opinion evidence might be unreliable. The Bill also codifies (with slight modifications) the uncontroversial aspects of the present law, so that all the admissibility requirements for expert evidence would be set out in a single Act of Parliament and carry equal authority.
Publisher: The Stationery Office
ISBN: 9780102971170
Category : Law
Languages : en
Pages : 224
Book Description
This project addressed the admissibility of expert evidence in criminal proceedings in England and Wales. Currently, too much expert opinion evidence is admitted without adequate scrutiny because no clear test is being applied to determine whether the evidence is sufficiently reliable to be admitted. Juries may therefore be reaching conclusions on the basis of unreliable evidence, as confirmed by a number of miscarriages of justice in recent years. Following consultation on a discussion paper (LCCP 190, 2009, ISDBN 9780118404655) the Commission recommends that there should be a new reliability-based admissibility test for expert evidence in criminal proceedings. The test would not need to be applied routinely or unnecessarily, but it would be applied in appropriate cases and it would result in the exclusion of unreliable expert opinion evidence. Under the test, expert opinion evidence would not be admitted unless it was adjudged to be sufficiently reliable to go before a jury. The draft Criminal Evidence (Experts) Bill published with the report (as Appendix A) sets out the admissibility test and also provides the guidance judges would need when applying the test, setting out the key reasons why an expert's opinion evidence might be unreliable. The Bill also codifies (with slight modifications) the uncontroversial aspects of the present law, so that all the admissibility requirements for expert evidence would be set out in a single Act of Parliament and carry equal authority.
A Concise History of the Common Law
Author: Theodore Frank Thomas Plucknett
Publisher: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.
ISBN: 1584771372
Category : Common law
Languages : en
Pages : 828
Book Description
Originally published: 5th ed. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1956.
Publisher: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.
ISBN: 1584771372
Category : Common law
Languages : en
Pages : 828
Book Description
Originally published: 5th ed. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1956.
The Judicial and Civil History of Connecticut
Author: Dwight Loomis
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Connecticut
Languages : en
Pages : 898
Book Description
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Connecticut
Languages : en
Pages : 898
Book Description