Mileage-based User Fee Public Opinion Study PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Mileage-based User Fee Public Opinion Study PDF full book. Access full book title Mileage-based User Fee Public Opinion Study by Robert Fichtner. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Robert Fichtner
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Congestion pricing
Languages : en
Pages : 49
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Robert Fichtner
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Congestion pricing
Languages : en
Pages : 49
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author:
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Industrial design
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Denvil Duncan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
The road mileage user-fee is viewed as a promising alternative to the fuel tax, which in recent years has proven to be an inadequate means of financing road infrastructure. Public opposition is often thought to be a barrier to the political feasibility of the road mileage user-fee, but there has been only limited empirical evidence to quantify this opposition and identify factors that may be driving it. We use a nationally representative public opinion survey to investigate the level and intensity of support for replacing the fuel tax with a mileage user-fee. Our results confirm that there is widespread public opposition to the adoption of mileage user-fees, with the number of opponents exceeding the number of supporters by a ratio of 4 to 1. Furthermore, public support for the mileage user-fee is largely independent of individual demographic characteristics but is sensitive to features of the mode of administration. Administration modes that improve public acceptability are those that minimize privacy intrusion, one-time technology costs, and tax evasion concerns, and maximize convenience, accuracy, and fairness. The intensity of opposition is stronger than the intensity of support; relative to supporters, those who oppose the mileage user-fee are more likely to state that they are willing to take political action against the adoption of mileage user-fees. Policy implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.
Author: Richard Tremain Baker
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Motor fuels
Languages : en
Pages : 28
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Paul Sorensen
Publisher: Rand Corporation
ISBN: 0833079212
Category : Technology & Engineering
Languages : en
Pages : 58
Get Book Here
Book Description
This primer presents some promising and innovative mileage fee system designs and transition strategies. For states or localities that are considering a transition to mileage fees, awareness of these strategies can help determine whether shifting from fuel taxes to mileage fees merits further consideration. For jurisdictions already engaged in detailed assessments of mileage fees, these concepts can help reduce costs and build public support.
Author: Matthew Bomberg
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Roads
Languages : en
Pages : 48
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Denvil Duncan
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 40
Get Book Here
Book Description
The mileage user-fee is a promising alternative to the fuel tax but public opposition is a barrier to implementation. We use a large nationally representative survey with an embedded experimental design to determine the extent to which key design features (technology costs and perceived invasion of privacy) influence public opinion regarding the adoption of mileage user-fees. Our findings confirm widespread opposition of mileage user-fees; the ratio of opponents to supporters is about four to one. The embedded experiment provides evidence that public opposition can be attenuated somewhat through two design features: insulating motorists from a new one-time cost for GPS technology to measure mileage, and safeguards that eliminate or minimize perceived invasions of privacy. Future research should explore additional design innovations that can minimize public opposition to this promising source of public revenue.
Author: Sean Slone
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Motor fuels
Languages : en
Pages : 7
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Paul Frisman
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Motor fuels
Languages : en
Pages : 3
Get Book Here
Book Description
Updates OLR research report 2016-R-0140, which discusses an application filed by the Connecticut Department of Transportation and four other states for a federal grant to study using a mileage-based user fee system to fund transportation projects.
Author: Justin David Carlton
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages :
Get Book Here
Book Description
Lack of sustainable revenue generation for transportation infrastructure has created a need for alternative funding sources. The most prominent of which is the Mileage Based User Fee (MBUF), where drivers would be charged based on the number of miles they drive, thus holding them accountable for their use of the roadway. While numerous equity related issues have been addressed, the interrelation of transportation taxation and expenditures on all levels of government (State, County, and Local) is not well understood. Using National Household Travel Survey data and information collected from over one hundred agencies, roadway taxation and expenditures were assigned to individual households in the Houston core based statistical area (CBSA). Using both Gini Coefficients and Theil Indices to analyze equity relationships, the research demonstrated that implementation of a MBUF would not have a pronounced effect on the current distribution of transportation taxation and expenditures, with the number of miles traveled and the total transit ridership remaining mostly unchanged. This also means that the equity of a MBUF is mostly equivalent to the current fuel tax. The relative winners of the current system are rural and high income urban households, while the relative losers are all other urban households. Increasing the MBUF to meet the Texas 2030 Committee recommendations would decrease the average benefit to taxation ratio, causing households to receive less than they pay into the system. Additionally, it would decrease the total number of miles traveled by 22.8% and increase transit ridership by as much as 10.2%. Still, equity of this scenario changed little from the equity of the current transportation funding system. However, excluding public transit expenditures resulted in a statistically significant and undesirable change in the Gini Coefficient, indicating that public transit has a positive impact on equity when considering the transportation system as a whole. Due to relatively flat rate taxes (vehicle registration, property tax, sales tax, etc.), the higher the miles driven, the lower the effective tax is per mile. When miles traveled are decreased by 22.8%, the effective tax per mile increases, which is the reason why the average benefit to taxation ratio was reduced. If transportation related taxation were to shift towards user based methods, then the benefit to taxation ratio should tend towards a value of one, indicating that all users receive exactly the value they pay for. If revenues are increased while the methods of taxation remain the same, low income urban households will be negatively impacted to the greatest degree. The electronic version of this dissertation is accessible from http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/152470
