Author: Mustafa Karnas
Publisher: Noetika Medya Yayıncılık Danışmanlık Bilişim.tur.san.ve Tic.a.ş.
ISBN: 6057626761
Category : Antiques & Collectibles
Languages : en
Pages : 194
Book Description
PRESENTATION: This book consists of questions asked by Mustafa KARNAS under the name of AKILTAŞI SORULARI and answered by him. The content of the questions is completely a product of CONSCIOUSNESS and it is an occasion for the reader to think, to contemplate, to open new windows in that person's mind, to form a new thinking system and to meet the person's METAPHYSICAL systematic and knowledge. The questions and their answers are about esoteric, spirituality, reason, intelligence, knowledge, science and areas that need to be questioned in life. MUSTAFA KARNAS QUESTION: What could be the first thing the creator created? Why and how he had to create himself. ANSWER: Himself (of course, this is a speculative answer - my truth - subjective, as some things cannot be tested) God and creation are both concepts - the creativity of a structure in the position of infinity is that it imprisons itself in a concept - greater than god force - it is he who creates the god. By conceptualizing himself as a god - limiting himself as a system to being creator - infinity is limited by making himself god-creator in order to manifest his time - his time to form the movement. Since everything that has been created is not in the position to create something, it is marked by finitude - the infinity god will end creation - that is, at that moment when the energy field ceases to be god, the whole universe will already begin at a point - the neutrino flow called the soul in everything. stop - the electron motion stops and everything collapses into it - nothing remains because but White movement creates understanding and reality in its own way. QUESTION: A person who identifies something with his own archetype (the archetype of the thing itself), what state does it make? ANSWER: Makes it a belief. QUESTION: What is the value that equates the inequality state? When you observe an uneven distribution in a field, you make a judgment that the distribution is uneven, the question is why did you observe this area? ANSWER: Trust. Since nobody observes inequality in a trustful environment, inequality disappears, if there is no observation, there is no event. Those who do not trust always observe and always see inequality, and the state of inequality persists, and a person who trusts justice - has confidence in sharing, does not control sharing and the perception of inequality disappears.
Metaphysical Answers to Metaphysical Questions (Book -2)
Author: Mustafa Karnas
Publisher: Noetika Medya Yayıncılık Danışmanlık Bilişim.tur.san.ve Tic.a.ş.
ISBN: 6057626761
Category : Antiques & Collectibles
Languages : en
Pages : 194
Book Description
PRESENTATION: This book consists of questions asked by Mustafa KARNAS under the name of AKILTAŞI SORULARI and answered by him. The content of the questions is completely a product of CONSCIOUSNESS and it is an occasion for the reader to think, to contemplate, to open new windows in that person's mind, to form a new thinking system and to meet the person's METAPHYSICAL systematic and knowledge. The questions and their answers are about esoteric, spirituality, reason, intelligence, knowledge, science and areas that need to be questioned in life. MUSTAFA KARNAS QUESTION: What could be the first thing the creator created? Why and how he had to create himself. ANSWER: Himself (of course, this is a speculative answer - my truth - subjective, as some things cannot be tested) God and creation are both concepts - the creativity of a structure in the position of infinity is that it imprisons itself in a concept - greater than god force - it is he who creates the god. By conceptualizing himself as a god - limiting himself as a system to being creator - infinity is limited by making himself god-creator in order to manifest his time - his time to form the movement. Since everything that has been created is not in the position to create something, it is marked by finitude - the infinity god will end creation - that is, at that moment when the energy field ceases to be god, the whole universe will already begin at a point - the neutrino flow called the soul in everything. stop - the electron motion stops and everything collapses into it - nothing remains because but White movement creates understanding and reality in its own way. QUESTION: A person who identifies something with his own archetype (the archetype of the thing itself), what state does it make? ANSWER: Makes it a belief. QUESTION: What is the value that equates the inequality state? When you observe an uneven distribution in a field, you make a judgment that the distribution is uneven, the question is why did you observe this area? ANSWER: Trust. Since nobody observes inequality in a trustful environment, inequality disappears, if there is no observation, there is no event. Those who do not trust always observe and always see inequality, and the state of inequality persists, and a person who trusts justice - has confidence in sharing, does not control sharing and the perception of inequality disappears.
Publisher: Noetika Medya Yayıncılık Danışmanlık Bilişim.tur.san.ve Tic.a.ş.
ISBN: 6057626761
Category : Antiques & Collectibles
Languages : en
Pages : 194
Book Description
PRESENTATION: This book consists of questions asked by Mustafa KARNAS under the name of AKILTAŞI SORULARI and answered by him. The content of the questions is completely a product of CONSCIOUSNESS and it is an occasion for the reader to think, to contemplate, to open new windows in that person's mind, to form a new thinking system and to meet the person's METAPHYSICAL systematic and knowledge. The questions and their answers are about esoteric, spirituality, reason, intelligence, knowledge, science and areas that need to be questioned in life. MUSTAFA KARNAS QUESTION: What could be the first thing the creator created? Why and how he had to create himself. ANSWER: Himself (of course, this is a speculative answer - my truth - subjective, as some things cannot be tested) God and creation are both concepts - the creativity of a structure in the position of infinity is that it imprisons itself in a concept - greater than god force - it is he who creates the god. By conceptualizing himself as a god - limiting himself as a system to being creator - infinity is limited by making himself god-creator in order to manifest his time - his time to form the movement. Since everything that has been created is not in the position to create something, it is marked by finitude - the infinity god will end creation - that is, at that moment when the energy field ceases to be god, the whole universe will already begin at a point - the neutrino flow called the soul in everything. stop - the electron motion stops and everything collapses into it - nothing remains because but White movement creates understanding and reality in its own way. QUESTION: A person who identifies something with his own archetype (the archetype of the thing itself), what state does it make? ANSWER: Makes it a belief. QUESTION: What is the value that equates the inequality state? When you observe an uneven distribution in a field, you make a judgment that the distribution is uneven, the question is why did you observe this area? ANSWER: Trust. Since nobody observes inequality in a trustful environment, inequality disappears, if there is no observation, there is no event. Those who do not trust always observe and always see inequality, and the state of inequality persists, and a person who trusts justice - has confidence in sharing, does not control sharing and the perception of inequality disappears.
Metaphysical Answers to Metaphysical Questions (Book -4)
Author: Mustafa Karnas
Publisher: Noetika Medya Yayıncılık Danışmanlık Bilişim.tur.san.ve Tic.a.ş.
ISBN: 6057617096
Category : Antiques & Collectibles
Languages : en
Pages : 169
Book Description
PRESENTATION: This work was previously published under the name of MIND STONE. The content of the work was carried out in the form of a strong work by Mustafa Karnas, during his training on METAPHYSICS, to identify the questions that need to be questioned, ask his followers, and have his followers find the answers with a reasoning and clues. It is a work EXCLUSIVE FOR THE SPECIAL PERSON, which is unique and has no precedent elsewhere. Indeed, it is beneficial to TRAIN these books in order to be AWARE and create AWARENESS in this world. MUSTAFA KARNAS CONTENTS THE QUESTİON OF METAPHYSİCS (37) If the whole universe is just holographic and the hologram consists of two dimensions, how come we see everything in three dimensions. What are we just seeing? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (38): Accordingly, Hz. If Adam had been created as a concept and not as a human being. In this case, Hz. What concept would Adam be? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (39): What do you have to turn a reality that is only in your mind into a reality known to others? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (40): To turn a paradox into a paradigm, what should you put into the matrix field where the paradox is? THE METAPHYSIC QUESTION (41): With what energy can we entropy (decompose) a matrix field in the position of non-contextuality? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (42): What do we need to change in order to get the energy needed to initiate the negentropy necessary to protect a system that has decayed? . THE METAPHYSICS QUESTION (43): Why does a person make an action? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (44): What has to be transformed into a thing in order to bring it into existence while a reality is nonexistent? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (45): In order to end a begun movement, what should we put the movement into? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (46): The human mind uses what kind of information to understand the energy field that it tries to perceive in the context of knowledge and consciousness. So what do you think with? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (47): Where is "I"? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (48): Who is mentioned with the word "those before us" in this verse? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (49): What happens when information is inverted to itself? THE METAPHYSICS QUESTION: (50): Why do we perceive one-dimensional things as one-dimensional? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (51): What cycle energy is attained? … THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (52): What do you have to do to transform an energy field that is perceived due to a paradox when observed, into a paradigmatic energy field? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (53): When you define an energy flow that does not have a certain space and time yet with a produced time and space, what would you do with this energy field? … THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (54): What is the name of the information bank that contains the laws of miracles? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (55): What law is the law that causes an order to become chaos? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (56): What kind of a person should be in order to make an invisible area visible and to reach information that does not show itself? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (57): Where / What is the source of the energy that transforms the impossibility paradigm into a miracle? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (58): In what situation should we be while observing this field in order to see the potential of a field that is not visible to us? THE METAPHYSICS QUESTION (59): Where is the space of the metaphysical mind? METAPHYSICSORUS (60): Hz. What did Mevlana and Shams give up in order to be monolithic when they entered the caliphate? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (61): What state is anything before it becomes a system? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (62): In order to put something into the paradox of meaninglessness, what state must the space of the fiction be transformed into? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (63): What is the only spatial space where energy, knowledge and concept can transform into each other? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (64): Without turning an energy field into a system, that is, in order not to cause it to undergo entropy, in what quantum mechanical space… would we both make it functional and ensure that it does not become a system? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (65): When the projection of the image of a system in us does not coincide with the image information we have about that system, how is this image perceived in our perception? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (66): Why are soap bubbles round? METAPHYSICS (67): When we accept love as the spatial state of energy, what energy does love dominate? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (68): What is the source of the probabilities of something? THE METAPHYSICS QUESTION (69): When a mind ceases to be a mind ... The answer is one word THE METAPHYSICS QUESTION (70): If the observed field distances the observer from observer capacity by pushing them out of the system. In this case, what error would the observer make towards the field he observed?
Publisher: Noetika Medya Yayıncılık Danışmanlık Bilişim.tur.san.ve Tic.a.ş.
ISBN: 6057617096
Category : Antiques & Collectibles
Languages : en
Pages : 169
Book Description
PRESENTATION: This work was previously published under the name of MIND STONE. The content of the work was carried out in the form of a strong work by Mustafa Karnas, during his training on METAPHYSICS, to identify the questions that need to be questioned, ask his followers, and have his followers find the answers with a reasoning and clues. It is a work EXCLUSIVE FOR THE SPECIAL PERSON, which is unique and has no precedent elsewhere. Indeed, it is beneficial to TRAIN these books in order to be AWARE and create AWARENESS in this world. MUSTAFA KARNAS CONTENTS THE QUESTİON OF METAPHYSİCS (37) If the whole universe is just holographic and the hologram consists of two dimensions, how come we see everything in three dimensions. What are we just seeing? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (38): Accordingly, Hz. If Adam had been created as a concept and not as a human being. In this case, Hz. What concept would Adam be? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (39): What do you have to turn a reality that is only in your mind into a reality known to others? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (40): To turn a paradox into a paradigm, what should you put into the matrix field where the paradox is? THE METAPHYSIC QUESTION (41): With what energy can we entropy (decompose) a matrix field in the position of non-contextuality? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (42): What do we need to change in order to get the energy needed to initiate the negentropy necessary to protect a system that has decayed? . THE METAPHYSICS QUESTION (43): Why does a person make an action? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (44): What has to be transformed into a thing in order to bring it into existence while a reality is nonexistent? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (45): In order to end a begun movement, what should we put the movement into? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (46): The human mind uses what kind of information to understand the energy field that it tries to perceive in the context of knowledge and consciousness. So what do you think with? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (47): Where is "I"? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (48): Who is mentioned with the word "those before us" in this verse? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (49): What happens when information is inverted to itself? THE METAPHYSICS QUESTION: (50): Why do we perceive one-dimensional things as one-dimensional? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (51): What cycle energy is attained? … THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (52): What do you have to do to transform an energy field that is perceived due to a paradox when observed, into a paradigmatic energy field? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (53): When you define an energy flow that does not have a certain space and time yet with a produced time and space, what would you do with this energy field? … THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (54): What is the name of the information bank that contains the laws of miracles? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (55): What law is the law that causes an order to become chaos? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (56): What kind of a person should be in order to make an invisible area visible and to reach information that does not show itself? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (57): Where / What is the source of the energy that transforms the impossibility paradigm into a miracle? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (58): In what situation should we be while observing this field in order to see the potential of a field that is not visible to us? THE METAPHYSICS QUESTION (59): Where is the space of the metaphysical mind? METAPHYSICSORUS (60): Hz. What did Mevlana and Shams give up in order to be monolithic when they entered the caliphate? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (61): What state is anything before it becomes a system? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (62): In order to put something into the paradox of meaninglessness, what state must the space of the fiction be transformed into? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (63): What is the only spatial space where energy, knowledge and concept can transform into each other? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (64): Without turning an energy field into a system, that is, in order not to cause it to undergo entropy, in what quantum mechanical space… would we both make it functional and ensure that it does not become a system? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (65): When the projection of the image of a system in us does not coincide with the image information we have about that system, how is this image perceived in our perception? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (66): Why are soap bubbles round? METAPHYSICS (67): When we accept love as the spatial state of energy, what energy does love dominate? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (68): What is the source of the probabilities of something? THE METAPHYSICS QUESTION (69): When a mind ceases to be a mind ... The answer is one word THE METAPHYSICS QUESTION (70): If the observed field distances the observer from observer capacity by pushing them out of the system. In this case, what error would the observer make towards the field he observed?
Metaphysical Answers to Metaphysical Questions (Book -3)
Author: Mustafa Karnas
Publisher: Noetika Medya Yayıncılık Danışmanlık Bilişim.tur.san.ve Tic.a.ş.
ISBN: 605762677X
Category : Antiques & Collectibles
Languages : en
Pages : 181
Book Description
CONTENTS THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (1): What causes the system to start to reverse - that is to say, to self-destruct when an information that is in a systematic and enables the fiction of the system to continue? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (2): If an observer is regarded as nonexistent by a field he observes, and if the observed field distances the observer from being an observer by pushing them out of the system. In this case, what error would the observer make towards the field he observed? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (3): What kind of force is the resulting force when a field of information framed by the perception of impossibility is turned into work? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (4): When the projection of a system's image in us does not coincide with the image information we have about that system, how is this image perceived in our perception? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (5): Why are soap bubbles round? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (6): According to the law of creation, if the reason for the existence of a thing is to complete another thing while being defined from another , In this case, when we accept love as the spatial state of energy, what energy does love dwell on? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (7): What is the road, what is the passenger, what is the passenger road? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (8): What are the possibilities of something, as well? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (9): What is the energy that occurs when the mind is at rest? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (10): What is the new space of the mind after bodily death? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (11): What is the new space of the mind after bodily death? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (12): What energy does innocence dwell on? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (13): If thinking is a state of energy; thinking in this case also has a space energy. What is the difference between dreaming and thinking in line with this information? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (14): Through this system, it symbolizes the divine law in itself and shows the manifested effect of God , The concept mentioned above , What is it? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (15): What location is a building in , 2 + 2: 4 , doesn't it? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (16): The concept called luck is a habi-taste, a field of knowledge, energy and matrix in itself. It shapes itself on a complete metaphysical system , Acting on this knowledge. If the system called chance is a space. What is the basic paradigm that feeds this field? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (17): Fenafillah, in his case, the saint, died before he died, got rid of himself. If we think on this matter. Getting rid of one's self means getting rid of what's oneself. THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (18): In order to transform one matrix into another, what does the matrix have to be changed? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (19): How can you make something worthless? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (20): What inevitably leads to the total energy element in the common field, which occurs when the energy fields enter into interaction, communication, admixture and observational relationship? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION: (21): It cannot reach the energy of realization that is not designed. What is the source energy of starting something to be designed in the mind. That is, why does the mind design a certain thing, but not something else , What is the source that designs that particular thing to the mind, that is, selectivity in perception? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (22): What is the reason why the field does not open itself to the observer, although he wants to observe a field. That is, what should the observer present to the field he wants to observe? … THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (23): What is the difference between dreaming and thinking? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (24): What is the place of "I"? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (25): To bring a business into a state of prudence and abundance - that is, business or. Need to align (encode) the relationship , with what? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (26): What do you turn into when you frame a matrix field, limit it and put it in the frame of perception. . formun üstü THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (27): A system that mentally enslaves a man (mind) , and enslaves its own paradigms, makes the target people think how to achieve this (slave minds do not think with reason). THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (28): If it were a quantum computer. What would you ask the computer first? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (29): In order to transform one matrix into another, what does the matrix have to be changed? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (30): Where is the place of knowledge? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (31): Why are soap bubbles round? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (32): In what state should the information be during the following process? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (33): What power do you activate when you give up something? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (34): Where is heaven? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (35): Where is the beginning of the event horizon of abstract mechanisms such as thought and imagination? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (36): What needs to be done in order to open up a new matrix field by allowing the paradoxical dilemma to re-interact with other possibilities?
Publisher: Noetika Medya Yayıncılık Danışmanlık Bilişim.tur.san.ve Tic.a.ş.
ISBN: 605762677X
Category : Antiques & Collectibles
Languages : en
Pages : 181
Book Description
CONTENTS THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (1): What causes the system to start to reverse - that is to say, to self-destruct when an information that is in a systematic and enables the fiction of the system to continue? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (2): If an observer is regarded as nonexistent by a field he observes, and if the observed field distances the observer from being an observer by pushing them out of the system. In this case, what error would the observer make towards the field he observed? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (3): What kind of force is the resulting force when a field of information framed by the perception of impossibility is turned into work? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (4): When the projection of a system's image in us does not coincide with the image information we have about that system, how is this image perceived in our perception? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (5): Why are soap bubbles round? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (6): According to the law of creation, if the reason for the existence of a thing is to complete another thing while being defined from another , In this case, when we accept love as the spatial state of energy, what energy does love dwell on? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (7): What is the road, what is the passenger, what is the passenger road? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (8): What are the possibilities of something, as well? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (9): What is the energy that occurs when the mind is at rest? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (10): What is the new space of the mind after bodily death? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (11): What is the new space of the mind after bodily death? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (12): What energy does innocence dwell on? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (13): If thinking is a state of energy; thinking in this case also has a space energy. What is the difference between dreaming and thinking in line with this information? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (14): Through this system, it symbolizes the divine law in itself and shows the manifested effect of God , The concept mentioned above , What is it? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (15): What location is a building in , 2 + 2: 4 , doesn't it? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (16): The concept called luck is a habi-taste, a field of knowledge, energy and matrix in itself. It shapes itself on a complete metaphysical system , Acting on this knowledge. If the system called chance is a space. What is the basic paradigm that feeds this field? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (17): Fenafillah, in his case, the saint, died before he died, got rid of himself. If we think on this matter. Getting rid of one's self means getting rid of what's oneself. THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (18): In order to transform one matrix into another, what does the matrix have to be changed? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (19): How can you make something worthless? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (20): What inevitably leads to the total energy element in the common field, which occurs when the energy fields enter into interaction, communication, admixture and observational relationship? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION: (21): It cannot reach the energy of realization that is not designed. What is the source energy of starting something to be designed in the mind. That is, why does the mind design a certain thing, but not something else , What is the source that designs that particular thing to the mind, that is, selectivity in perception? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (22): What is the reason why the field does not open itself to the observer, although he wants to observe a field. That is, what should the observer present to the field he wants to observe? … THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (23): What is the difference between dreaming and thinking? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (24): What is the place of "I"? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (25): To bring a business into a state of prudence and abundance - that is, business or. Need to align (encode) the relationship , with what? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (26): What do you turn into when you frame a matrix field, limit it and put it in the frame of perception. . formun üstü THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (27): A system that mentally enslaves a man (mind) , and enslaves its own paradigms, makes the target people think how to achieve this (slave minds do not think with reason). THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (28): If it were a quantum computer. What would you ask the computer first? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (29): In order to transform one matrix into another, what does the matrix have to be changed? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (30): Where is the place of knowledge? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (31): Why are soap bubbles round? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (32): In what state should the information be during the following process? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (33): What power do you activate when you give up something? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (34): Where is heaven? THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (35): Where is the beginning of the event horizon of abstract mechanisms such as thought and imagination? . THE METAPHYSICAL QUESTION (36): What needs to be done in order to open up a new matrix field by allowing the paradoxical dilemma to re-interact with other possibilities?
Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics
Author: Marcus Willaschek
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 110859607X
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 312
Book Description
In the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant famously criticizes traditional metaphysics and its proofs of immortality, free will and God's existence. What is often overlooked is that Kant also explains why rational beings must ask metaphysical questions about 'unconditioned' objects such as souls, uncaused causes or God, and why answers to these questions will appear rationally compelling to them. In this book, Marcus Willaschek reconstructs and defends Kant's account of the rational sources of metaphysics. After carefully explaining Kant's conceptions of reason and metaphysics, he offers detailed interpretations of the relevant passages from the Critique of Pure Reason (in particular, the 'Transcendental Dialectic') in which Kant explains why reason seeks 'the unconditioned'. Willaschek offers a novel interpretation of the Transcendental Dialectic, pointing up its 'positive' side, while at the same time it uncovers a highly original account of metaphysical thinking that will be relevant to contemporary philosophical debates.
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 110859607X
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 312
Book Description
In the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant famously criticizes traditional metaphysics and its proofs of immortality, free will and God's existence. What is often overlooked is that Kant also explains why rational beings must ask metaphysical questions about 'unconditioned' objects such as souls, uncaused causes or God, and why answers to these questions will appear rationally compelling to them. In this book, Marcus Willaschek reconstructs and defends Kant's account of the rational sources of metaphysics. After carefully explaining Kant's conceptions of reason and metaphysics, he offers detailed interpretations of the relevant passages from the Critique of Pure Reason (in particular, the 'Transcendental Dialectic') in which Kant explains why reason seeks 'the unconditioned'. Willaschek offers a novel interpretation of the Transcendental Dialectic, pointing up its 'positive' side, while at the same time it uncovers a highly original account of metaphysical thinking that will be relevant to contemporary philosophical debates.
Metaphysics
Author: Aristotle
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0199682984
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 339
Book Description
Laura Castelli presents a new translation of the tenth book (Iota) of Aristotle's Metaphysics, together with a comprehensive commentary. Castelli's commentary helps readers to understand Aristotle's most systematic account of what it is for something to be one, what it is for something to be a unit of measurement, and what contraries are.
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 0199682984
Category : History
Languages : en
Pages : 339
Book Description
Laura Castelli presents a new translation of the tenth book (Iota) of Aristotle's Metaphysics, together with a comprehensive commentary. Castelli's commentary helps readers to understand Aristotle's most systematic account of what it is for something to be one, what it is for something to be a unit of measurement, and what contraries are.
Metaphysics
Author: Michael Loux
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1134144873
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 329
Book Description
'Metaphysics' is aimed at students of metaphysics who have already completed an introductory philosophy course. This third edition provides a fresh look at the key topics in metaphysics and includes new chapters on time and causation.
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1134144873
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 329
Book Description
'Metaphysics' is aimed at students of metaphysics who have already completed an introductory philosophy course. This third edition provides a fresh look at the key topics in metaphysics and includes new chapters on time and causation.
Every Thing Must Go
Author: James Ladyman
Publisher: OUP Oxford
ISBN: 0191534757
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 359
Book Description
Every Thing Must Go argues that the only kind of metaphysics that can contribute to objective knowledge is one based specifically on contemporary science as it really is, and not on philosophers' a priori intuitions, common sense, or simplifications of science. In addition to showing how recent metaphysics has drifted away from connection with all other serious scholarly inquiry as a result of not heeding this restriction, they demonstrate how to build a metaphysics compatible with current fundamental physics ('ontic structural realism'), which, when combined with their metaphysics of the special sciences ('rainforest realism'), can be used to unify physics with the other sciences without reducing these sciences to physics itself. Taking science metaphysically seriously, Ladyman and Ross argue, means that metaphysicians must abandon the picture of the world as composed of self-subsistent individual objects, and the paradigm of causation as the collision of such objects. Every Thing Must Go also assesses the role of information theory and complex systems theory in attempts to explain the relationship between the special sciences and physics, treading a middle road between the grand synthesis of thermodynamics and information, and eliminativism about information. The consequences of the author's metaphysical theory for central issues in the philosophy of science are explored, including the implications for the realism vs. empiricism debate, the role of causation in scientific explanations, the nature of causation and laws, the status of abstract and virtual objects, and the objective reality of natural kinds.
Publisher: OUP Oxford
ISBN: 0191534757
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 359
Book Description
Every Thing Must Go argues that the only kind of metaphysics that can contribute to objective knowledge is one based specifically on contemporary science as it really is, and not on philosophers' a priori intuitions, common sense, or simplifications of science. In addition to showing how recent metaphysics has drifted away from connection with all other serious scholarly inquiry as a result of not heeding this restriction, they demonstrate how to build a metaphysics compatible with current fundamental physics ('ontic structural realism'), which, when combined with their metaphysics of the special sciences ('rainforest realism'), can be used to unify physics with the other sciences without reducing these sciences to physics itself. Taking science metaphysically seriously, Ladyman and Ross argue, means that metaphysicians must abandon the picture of the world as composed of self-subsistent individual objects, and the paradigm of causation as the collision of such objects. Every Thing Must Go also assesses the role of information theory and complex systems theory in attempts to explain the relationship between the special sciences and physics, treading a middle road between the grand synthesis of thermodynamics and information, and eliminativism about information. The consequences of the author's metaphysical theory for central issues in the philosophy of science are explored, including the implications for the realism vs. empiricism debate, the role of causation in scientific explanations, the nature of causation and laws, the status of abstract and virtual objects, and the objective reality of natural kinds.
Metaphysical Perspectives
Author: Nicholas Rescher
Publisher: University of Notre Dame Pess
ISBN: 0268102929
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 311
Book Description
In Metaphysical Perspectives, Nicholas Rescher offers a grand vision of how to conceptualize, and in some cases answer, some of the most fundamental issues in metaphysics and value theory. Rescher addresses what he sees as the three prime areas of metaphysical concern: (1) the world as such and the architecture of nature at large, (2) ourselves as nature's denizens and our potential for learning about it, and (3) the transcendent domain of possibility and value. Rescher engages issues across a wide range of metaphysical themes, from different worldviews and ultimate questions to contingency and necessity, intelligent design and world-improvability, personhood and consciousness, empathy and other minds, moral obligation, and philosophical methodology. Over the course of this book, Rescher discusses, with his characteristic fusion of idealism and pragmatism, an integrated overview of the key philosophical problems grounded in an idealistically value-oriented approach. His discussion seeks to shed new light on philosophically central issues from a unified point of view.
Publisher: University of Notre Dame Pess
ISBN: 0268102929
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 311
Book Description
In Metaphysical Perspectives, Nicholas Rescher offers a grand vision of how to conceptualize, and in some cases answer, some of the most fundamental issues in metaphysics and value theory. Rescher addresses what he sees as the three prime areas of metaphysical concern: (1) the world as such and the architecture of nature at large, (2) ourselves as nature's denizens and our potential for learning about it, and (3) the transcendent domain of possibility and value. Rescher engages issues across a wide range of metaphysical themes, from different worldviews and ultimate questions to contingency and necessity, intelligent design and world-improvability, personhood and consciousness, empathy and other minds, moral obligation, and philosophical methodology. Over the course of this book, Rescher discusses, with his characteristic fusion of idealism and pragmatism, an integrated overview of the key philosophical problems grounded in an idealistically value-oriented approach. His discussion seeks to shed new light on philosophically central issues from a unified point of view.
Metaphysics, Sophistry, and Illusion
Author: Mark Balaguer
Publisher:
ISBN: 0198868367
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 321
Book Description
Metaphysics, Sophistry, and Illusion introduces a novel kind of non-factualist view, and argues that we should endorse views of this kind in connection with a wide class of metaphysical questions. It also explains how these non-factualist views fit into a general anti-metaphysical view called neo-positivism.
Publisher:
ISBN: 0198868367
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 321
Book Description
Metaphysics, Sophistry, and Illusion introduces a novel kind of non-factualist view, and argues that we should endorse views of this kind in connection with a wide class of metaphysical questions. It also explains how these non-factualist views fit into a general anti-metaphysical view called neo-positivism.
Postmetaphysical Thinking II
Author: Jürgen Habermas
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
ISBN: 0745694934
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 262
Book Description
‘There is no alternative to postmetaphysical thinking’: this statement, made by Jürgen Habermas in 1988, has lost none of its relevance. Postmetaphysical thinking is, in the first place, the historical answer to the crisis of metaphysics following Hegel, when the central metaphysical figures of thought began to totter under the pressure exerted by social developments and by developments within science. As a result, philosophy’s epistemological privilege was shaken to its core, its basic concepts were de-transcendentalized, and the primacy of theory over practice was opened to question. For good reasons, philosophy ‘lost its extraordinary status’, but as a result it also courted new problems. In Postmetaphysical Thinking II, the sequel to the 1988 volume that bears the same title (English translation, Polity 1992), Habermas addresses some of these problems. The first section of the book deals with the shift in perspective from metaphysical worldviews to the lifeworld, the unarticulated meanings and assumptions that accompany everyday thought and action in the mode of ‘background knowledge’. Habermas analyses the lifeworld as a ‘space of reasons’ – even where language is not (yet) involved, such as, for example, in gestural communication and rituals. In the second section, the uneasy relationship between religion and postmetaphysical thinking takes centre stage. Habermas picks up where he left off in 1988, when he made the far-sighted observation that ‘philosophy, even in its postmetaphysical form, will be able neither to replace nor to repress religion’, and explores philosophy’s new-found interest in religion, among other topics. The final section includes essays on the role of religion in the political context of a post-secular, liberal society. This volume will be of great interest to students and scholars in philosophy, religion and the social sciences and humanities generally.
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
ISBN: 0745694934
Category : Philosophy
Languages : en
Pages : 262
Book Description
‘There is no alternative to postmetaphysical thinking’: this statement, made by Jürgen Habermas in 1988, has lost none of its relevance. Postmetaphysical thinking is, in the first place, the historical answer to the crisis of metaphysics following Hegel, when the central metaphysical figures of thought began to totter under the pressure exerted by social developments and by developments within science. As a result, philosophy’s epistemological privilege was shaken to its core, its basic concepts were de-transcendentalized, and the primacy of theory over practice was opened to question. For good reasons, philosophy ‘lost its extraordinary status’, but as a result it also courted new problems. In Postmetaphysical Thinking II, the sequel to the 1988 volume that bears the same title (English translation, Polity 1992), Habermas addresses some of these problems. The first section of the book deals with the shift in perspective from metaphysical worldviews to the lifeworld, the unarticulated meanings and assumptions that accompany everyday thought and action in the mode of ‘background knowledge’. Habermas analyses the lifeworld as a ‘space of reasons’ – even where language is not (yet) involved, such as, for example, in gestural communication and rituals. In the second section, the uneasy relationship between religion and postmetaphysical thinking takes centre stage. Habermas picks up where he left off in 1988, when he made the far-sighted observation that ‘philosophy, even in its postmetaphysical form, will be able neither to replace nor to repress religion’, and explores philosophy’s new-found interest in religion, among other topics. The final section includes essays on the role of religion in the political context of a post-secular, liberal society. This volume will be of great interest to students and scholars in philosophy, religion and the social sciences and humanities generally.