Linking the PARCC Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests for Illinois PDF Download
Are you looking for read ebook online? Search for your book and save it on your Kindle device, PC, phones or tablets. Download Linking the PARCC Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests for Illinois PDF full book. Access full book title Linking the PARCC Assessments to NWEA MAP Tests for Illinois by Northwest Evaluation Association. Download full books in PDF and EPUB format.
Author: Northwest Evaluation Association
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 23
Get Book Here
Book Description
Northwest Evaluation Association" (NWEA") is committed to providing partners with useful tools to help make inferences from the Measures of Academic Progressʼ (MAPʼ) interim assessment scores. One important tool is the concordance table between MAP and state summative assessments. Concordance tables have been used for decades to relate scores on different tests measuring similar but distinct constructs. These tables, typically derived from statistical linking procedures, provide a direct link between scores on different tests and serve various purposes. Aside from describing how a score on one test relates to performance on another test, they can also be used to identify benchmark scores on one test corresponding to performance categories on another test, or to maintain continuity of scores on a test after the test is redesigned or changed. Concordance tables are helpful for educators, parents, administrators, researchers, and policy makers to evaluate and formulate academic standing and growth. Recently, NWEA completed a concordance study to connect the scales of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) English language arts (ELA) and math with those of the MAP Reading and MAP for Mathematics assessments for Illinois (IL). In this report, presented are the 3rd through 8th grade cut scores on MAP reading and mathematics scales that correspond to the benchmarks that Illinois adopted for its PARCC ELA and math tests. Information about the consistency rate of classification based on the estimated MAP cut scores is also provided, along with a series of tables that predict the probability of receiving a Level 4 (i.e., "Proficient") or higher performance designation on the PARCC assessments, based on the observed MAP scores taken during the same school year. A detailed description of the data and analysis method used in this study is provided in the appendix.
Author: Northwest Evaluation Association
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 23
Get Book Here
Book Description
Northwest Evaluation Association" (NWEA") is committed to providing partners with useful tools to help make inferences from the Measures of Academic Progressʼ (MAPʼ) interim assessment scores. One important tool is the concordance table between MAP and state summative assessments. Concordance tables have been used for decades to relate scores on different tests measuring similar but distinct constructs. These tables, typically derived from statistical linking procedures, provide a direct link between scores on different tests and serve various purposes. Aside from describing how a score on one test relates to performance on another test, they can also be used to identify benchmark scores on one test corresponding to performance categories on another test, or to maintain continuity of scores on a test after the test is redesigned or changed. Concordance tables are helpful for educators, parents, administrators, researchers, and policy makers to evaluate and formulate academic standing and growth. Recently, NWEA completed a concordance study to connect the scales of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) English language arts (ELA) and math with those of the MAP Reading and MAP for Mathematics assessments for Illinois (IL). In this report, presented are the 3rd through 8th grade cut scores on MAP reading and mathematics scales that correspond to the benchmarks that Illinois adopted for its PARCC ELA and math tests. Information about the consistency rate of classification based on the estimated MAP cut scores is also provided, along with a series of tables that predict the probability of receiving a Level 4 (i.e., "Proficient") or higher performance designation on the PARCC assessments, based on the observed MAP scores taken during the same school year. A detailed description of the data and analysis method used in this study is provided in the appendix.
Author: Northwest Evaluation Association
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 23
Get Book Here
Book Description
Northwest Evaluation Association" (NWEA") is committed to providing partners with useful tools to help make inferences from the Measures of Academic Progressʼ (MAPʼ) interim assessment scores. One important tool is the concordance table between MAP and state summative assessments. Concordance tables have been used for decades to relate scores on different tests measuring similar but distinct constructs. These tables, typically derived from statistical linking procedures, provide a direct link between scores on different tests and serve various purposes. Aside from describing how a score on one test relates to performance on another test, they can also be used to identify benchmark scores on one test corresponding to performance categories on another test, or to maintain continuity of scores on a test after the test is redesigned or changed. Concordance tables are helpful for educators, parents, administrators, researchers, and policy makers to evaluate and formulate academic standing and growth. Recently, NWEA completed a concordance study to connect the scales of the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) English language arts (ELA) and math with those of the MAP Reading and MAP for Mathematics assessments for New Mexico (NM). In this report, presented are the 3rd through 8th grade cut scores on MAP reading and mathematics scales that correspond to the benchmarks that Illinois adopted for its PARCC ELA and math tests. Information about the consistency rate of classification based on the estimated MAP cut scores is also provided, along with a series of tables that predict the probability of receiving a Level 4 (i.e., "Proficient") or higher performance designation on the PARCC assessments, based on the observed MAP scores taken during the same school year. A detailed description of the data and analysis method used in this study is provided in the appendix.
Author: Northwest Evaluation Association
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 26
Get Book Here
Book Description
Northwest Evaluation Association" (NWEA") is committed to providing partners with useful tools to help make inferences from the Measures of Academic Progressʼ (MAPʼ) interim assessment scores. One important tool is the concordance table between MAP and state summative assessments. Concordance tables have been used for decades to relate scores on different tests measuring similar but distinct constructs. These tables, typically derived from statistical linking procedures, provide a direct link between scores on different tests and serve various purposes. Aside from describing how a score on one test relates to performance on another test, they can also be used to identify benchmark scores on one test corresponding to performance categories on another test, or to maintain continuity of scores on a test after the test is redesigned or changed. Concordance tables are helpful for educators, parents, administrators, researchers, and policy makers to evaluate and formulate academic standing and growth. Recently, NWEA completed a concordance study to connect the scales of the Alaska Measures of Progress (AMP) English Language Arts (ELA) and Mathematics assessments with those of the MAP Reading and MAP for Mathematics assessments. This report presents the 3rd through 10th grade cut scores on MAP reading and mathematics scales that correspond to the benchmarks on the AMP ELA and math tests. Information about the consistency rate of classification based on the estimated MAP cut scores is also provided, along with a series of tables that predict the probability of receiving a Level 3 (i.e., "Proficient") or higher performance designation on the AMP assessments, based on the observed MAP scores taken during the same school year. A detailed description of the data and analysis method used in this study is provided in the Appendix.
Author: Northwest Evaluation Association
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category :
Languages : en
Pages : 8
Get Book Here
Book Description
Measures of Academic Progressʼ (MAPʼ) computer adaptive interim assessments serve many purposes, from informing instruction to identifying students for intervention to projecting proficiency on state accountability assessments. To make sure its flagship product does the latter, Northwest Evaluation Association" (NWEA") routinely conducts studies that provide estimates of how MAP RIT scores correspond to "proficient" and other performance levels on summative state accountability assessments. These studies provide schools and districts using MAP assessments with tools to predict whether students will demonstrate adequate reading and mathematics achievement on their state accountability assessments, and allow them to adjust instructional plans accordingly. In recent months, many school districts have requested that NWEA provide similar studies to estimate how MAP RIT scores correspond to "college and career readiness" as it will be measured by various tests. These include the two upcoming Common Core consortia tests-- Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium (Smarter Balanced) and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC)--as well as other non-consortia tests aligned to the Common Core standards. To be clear: NWEA will conduct new studies. However, Smarter Balanced and PARCC have not yet finalized their proficiency level cut scores. Smarter Balanced did release preliminary threshold scale scores in November of 2014, but final cut score values will not be verified and adopted for either assessment until the summer of 2015 (PARCC timeline, Smarter Balanced timeline). This information is critical in conducting a linking study, since students' observed scores on both tests are examined to understand how one test predicts performance on the other. While nobody currently knows what college and career readiness scores on PARCC will eventually be, we can make educated guesses, and some states have already done so. New York, Illinois, and Kentucky have all implemented changes in their state proficiency benchmarks in anticipation of more rigorous standards. Furthermore, the preliminary threshold scale scores released by Smarter Balanced may provide additional insight into what "college readiness" might look like on PARCC once its performance standards have been set. These studies provide a preliminary indication of what college and career readiness may look like for MAP users in other states that align their tests to new standards. But the question remains: What can school districts that use MAP RIT scores do right now to understand whether students are on track to meet college and career readiness performance standards? One approach is to use cut scores that do currently exist from the New York, Illinois, and Kentucky tests, or from the initial estimates for Smarter Balanced, and relate them to MAP RIT cut scores. It's important to note that these state cut scores will not coincide precisely with the college and career readiness values that PARCC or other states will eventually adopt, but they may provide a guide during the interim. The tables and figures shown in the appendix may be used as rough guidelines. The values presented here simply represent an educated guess about what those benchmarks might look like, given that other assessments have defined college readiness similarly. As soon as the new cut scores and performance levels are finalized, NWEA will conduct studies that directly examine the ability of MAP to predict performance on those tests. Contained in the appendix are links used in this document.
Author: Bright Minds Publishing
Publisher: Bright Minds Publishing
ISBN: 1478247843
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 106
Get Book Here
Book Description
This book is a great resource for students who are planning to appear for the CogAT test for getting into Grade 2 (i.e. current 1st grade students). This book also includes useful tips for preparing for the CogAT test. This books has one full length test similar in format to the actual test that will be administered in the CogAT Test. This test has been authored by experienced professional, verified by educators and administered to students who planned on appearing for the CogAT test. This book has 9 sections as listed below Section 1: Picture Analogies Section 2: Sentence Completion Section 3: Picture Classification Section 4: Number Analogies Section 5: Number Puzzles Section 6: Number Series Section 7: Figure Matrices Section 8: Paper Folding Section 9: Figure Classification We have responded to feedback from our customers. The book now includes additional challenging problems that your child can solve to prepare for the test. The book also includes explanation all 9 sections and the bonus problems in this book.
Author: William H. Angoff
Publisher:
ISBN:
Category : Educational tests and measurements
Languages : en
Pages : 156
Get Book Here
Book Description
Author: Flash Kids
Publisher: Spark Publishing Group
ISBN: 9781411404038
Category : Juvenile Nonfiction
Languages : en
Pages : 0
Get Book Here
Book Description
Standardized test-taking skills for reading, math and language for grade 7.
Author: Margaret J. Snowling
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons
ISBN: 1118712307
Category : Psychology
Languages : en
Pages : 922
Get Book Here
Book Description
The Science of Reading: A Handbook brings together state-of-the-art reviews of reading research from leading names in the field, to create a highly authoritative, multidisciplinary overview of contemporary knowledge about reading and related skills. Provides comprehensive coverage of the subject, including theoretical approaches, reading processes, stage models of reading, cross-linguistic studies of reading, reading difficulties, the biology of reading, and reading instruction Divided into seven sections:Word Recognition Processes in Reading; Learning to Read and Spell; Reading Comprehension; Reading in Different Languages; Disorders of Reading and Spelling; Biological Bases of Reading; Teaching Reading Edited by well-respected senior figures in the field
Author: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
ISBN: 0309289548
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 296
Get Book Here
Book Description
Assessments, understood as tools for tracking what and how well students have learned, play a critical role in the classroom. Developing Assessments for the Next Generation Science Standards develops an approach to science assessment to meet the vision of science education for the future as it has been elaborated in A Framework for K-12 Science Education (Framework) and Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS). These documents are brand new and the changes they call for are barely under way, but the new assessments will be needed as soon as states and districts begin the process of implementing the NGSS and changing their approach to science education. The new Framework and the NGSS are designed to guide educators in significantly altering the way K-12 science is taught. The Framework is aimed at making science education more closely resemble the way scientists actually work and think, and making instruction reflect research on learning that demonstrates the importance of building coherent understandings over time. It structures science education around three dimensions - the practices through which scientists and engineers do their work, the key crosscutting concepts that cut across disciplines, and the core ideas of the disciplines - and argues that they should be interwoven in every aspect of science education, building in sophistication as students progress through grades K-12. Developing Assessments for the Next Generation Science Standards recommends strategies for developing assessments that yield valid measures of student proficiency in science as described in the new Framework. This report reviews recent and current work in science assessment to determine which aspects of the Framework's vision can be assessed with available techniques and what additional research and development will be needed to support an assessment system that fully meets that vision. The report offers a systems approach to science assessment, in which a range of assessment strategies are designed to answer different kinds of questions with appropriate degrees of specificity and provide results that complement one another. Developing Assessments for the Next Generation Science Standards makes the case that a science assessment system that meets the Framework's vision should consist of assessments designed to support classroom instruction, assessments designed to monitor science learning on a broader scale, and indicators designed to track opportunity to learn. New standards for science education make clear that new modes of assessment designed to measure the integrated learning they promote are essential. The recommendations of this report will be key to making sure that the dramatic changes in curriculum and instruction signaled by Framework and the NGSS reduce inequities in science education and raise the level of science education for all students.
Author: Karen B. Rogers
Publisher: Great Potential Press, Inc.
ISBN: 0910707464
Category : Education
Languages : en
Pages : 528
Get Book Here
Book Description
Parents of gifted children need to present schools with educational plans. Current educational programs for gifted students are generally inadequate and do not fit the particular gifted child. Rogers explains various programs for acceleration and enrichment, as well as grouping practices. For each educational option, she delineates what the current research says about the benefit or lack of benefit to which types of gifted children and explains how to arrange each option. This book is a real eye-opener for educators and parents unfamiliar with the full body of research in the field of curriculum for gifted education. ? Types of giftedness ? Types of enrichment ? Gifts versus talents ? Group learning ? Assessment tools ? Independent study ? Parent Inventory for ? Yearly Educational Plans Finding Potential ? Negotiating with schools ? Types of acceleration ? Monitoring progress
